Agree. Geneva lugs? 1948/49 Cal 28.10 with variation on the dial markers all Roman numerals in place of the alternate hour dot markers.
Mouse_at_large, I agree with you too, I can see both arguments for and against, I'm only going to do what Christian advises me to do, he's the expert after all. Yes, it's how my Grandad would have seen it but it's not how he saw it when he bought it and I think there's something about getting it back to its original state.
I'm not sure they make exceptions for new customers (no matter how worthy the watch )
My guess is it's from the 1940s with a 28.10 Bumper movement.
Are you prepared to ruin it and start over? Unless your answer is yes......
Do you have the case diameter? (measure outside diameter from 2-8)
Maybe you got lucky and have the larger 30.10. The 28.10 is more common and very similar.
Your case looks very similar to my 30.10 from 1949.
If your answer is yes and you decide to redial, you will affect the collector value very little as it is already redialed. You will have a nice shiny watch with great provenance!
My point was that if you touched the current dial for cleaning, expect disaster, the ink looks very fragile.
But then, I like patina , real boobs over augmented, a gracefully aged Lady over the one with facelifts, etc., etc.
The members have been politely telling you that the finished product will not have resale value equal to your investment, sentiment doesn't transfer to new owners very well.
The value can only be measured successfully in your heart, not in the checkbook.
It's resale value isn't important to me as I won't be selling it, I plan to restore it and wear it with pride
Wear it in good health with pride and thanks for sharing!
Now you know why they call them bumpers!
Unless there is a surprise for us, you'll find the 28.10. If we are several years off on the age, there could be a later variation but I doubt it.
We'll learn a lot when you open'er up.
Remember, send us pictures!
Mouse_at_large, I agree with you too, I can see both arguments for and against, I'm only going to do what Christian advises me to do, he's the expert after all. Yes, it's how my Grandad would have seen it but it's not how he saw it when he bought it and I think there's something about getting it back to its original state.
The dial has been refinished before already, so refinishing it again won't make a difference. Christian will have someone else do it if you request a dial repaint. Not gonna be the best quality but will be enjoyable.
The best solution is to look around for a vintage dial in good condition that is correct for your watch, but it will require much effort and depend a lot on your luck.
According to my Mum, the watch has never been serviced... She says her Dad wouldn't have bothered. She never serviced it and my Dad didn't either while he was using it. It's had a hard life by the sound of it but it's still going strong! Could the current dial condition be purely down corrosion and ageing? The only other explanation is that my Grandad bought it secondhand. But according to my Mum, he wasn't the type to buy used!
The dial certainly is in poor condition at the moment. It also appears 100% refinished to me, based on the poor printing of the logo and fonts and a few other signs. The refinish was very well the result of the original dial had gone bad a few decades ago.
As for its service history, it's probably impossible for a person to remember everything in the last 60 years, especially about something she did not have possession of for likely several decades. 😀
Any ideas where I might be able to source a dial?