JwRosenthal
·Not a “re-dial” in my opinion. This would fall in the same class of a service dial. Something that was made by the original manufacturer, intended to replace a worn out part, but is not the original part.
You could sell the watch with a designation of a correct replacement dial. Same would be true of a redial. Your conscience should be clear.
The issue in collector world is not about what you did. It is about what the next owner, or the owners after that would do.
We see this now and again with so-called WatchCo Seamaster 300’s. These are watches that were put together with OEM parts by an Omega parts supplier in Australia. Again, I have no problems with such a piece so long as disclosed, but since many are now in their 3rd or greater owner, their origins might be totally forgotten and advertised as “all original” when clearly they are not.
Not sure what we or should do about this, but the issue is not going away.
gatorcpa
Obviously we can’t police the watch selling world and keeping up with fraudulent listings on eBay is like playing whack-a-mole, but as a collectors group we can keep the information freely flowing about what is vintage and what isn’t.
Regardless of how many times a new member askes “is this original”, rather than snarking out with “do your homework” or “have you used the search feature” or we are not an appraisal group”- we can simply say- no, it’s not original. If you would like to learn more about them, there are numerous threads here that can be found through the search feature.