Submariner vs Seamaster 300 Request

Hands90 · Mar 12, 2016

I can ask this here because I'm on the Omega Forum but I'm surprised everyone makes threads that show Submariner vs Speedmaster. I figure it's because both of these pieces are iconic but I think the submariner vs seamaster 300 is more accurate. Other then the vintage look of the 300 both are seen as dress divers.

I'd like to see a review of both of these reviewed together.

jcmartinez98 · Mar 12, 2016

Hands90
I can ask this here because I'm on the Omega Forum but I'm surprised everyone makes threads that show Submariner vs Speedmaster. I figure it's because both of these pieces are iconic but I think the submariner vs seamaster 300 is more accurate. Other then the vintage look of the 300 both are seen as dress divers.

I'd like to see a review of both of these reviewed together.

There are sub vs PO reviews out there in case that may interest you

wx_073 · Mar 12, 2016

jcmartinez98
There are sub vs PO reviews out there in case that may interest you

Fully agree Sub vs PO thats closest weight category...if you take a look speedy i'd say go then vs Daytona as both of them chrono...my 2ct

Jensop · Mar 12, 2016

Try googling: Photo Study: SM300MC & 114060

Alpha · Mar 12, 2016

Thanks to @meganfox17 and talk of Bond I can't even remember what this thread is all about, I wonder why 😉

alam · Mar 12, 2016

hell of a weapon she ↑ carries... 🍿

Alpha · Mar 12, 2016

alam
hell of a weapon she ^ carries... 🍿

Now if you directed that comment at me ::facepalm1::

alam · Mar 12, 2016

Alpha
Now if you directed that comment at me

the Bond lady! the Bond lady! 🤦🤦🤦

Huus · Mar 12, 2016

Isn't that Ursula Undress? What a waist👍 but wasted on that Bond bloke.

Syrte · Mar 12, 2016

It is Ursula Andress, but as another female voice here I'll agree with MeganFox-- no one's wasted on Sean Connery...

Perseus · Mar 14, 2016

I've seen comparison reviews of the SM 300 and the sub but I didn't save them. I'm Google can deliver.

Perseus · Mar 14, 2016

meganfox17
I love Daniel Craig too...I still think "Cowboys & Aliens " was his 5th James Bond movie....

Let's Not talk about Pierce Brosnan & the defacto James Bond SM 300 . I always thought Brosnan was a Wussy.....

Casino Royale is my favorite Bone movie off all time. As much I like Connery his movies were fairly campy and Brosnan is way too girly. Have you seen that guy run?!

Alpha · Mar 14, 2016

Fortunate to have both and far short of a review I would say the Sub is the most comfortable wearer of the two.

Travelller · May 9, 2016

I only recently took delivery of my SM300MC so I cannot offer a valid comparison (with my Sea Dweller) just yet...
...but at least a couple of photos of two very, very nice divers 😎

WatchVaultNYC · May 9, 2016

Slightly bit OT, but I've been rotating between a Sub 14060 and an SMP (both older versions, but similar comparison)

Sub Pros:
- larger crown so easy to operate
- works better with straps
- drilled lugs!
- more suitable if you're equal parts dressy and casual

SMP Pros:
- larger, more modern case size
- more interesting case design
- 1120 movement easy to service anywhere
- more suitable if you're mostly casual

flw · May 9, 2016

I own both a SubC Date and a SM300 MC. In order to do a proper review, I'll have to take a lot of photos and write some lengthy text. I will be happy to do so, but I don't think I can get to it and do the topic justice for another couple of weeks or so. (I have a lot to say, and I don't want to do a rush job.) If everyone can be patient, I will tackle this (but not on video - ugh!). When it's done, I will let everyone know, and I'll post it on the Reviews section.

KJE23 · May 10, 2016

Funny because I'm debating this myself right now....I need a diver as my go to everyday watch. I'm a big Omega fan but have always appreciated the Rolex Sub No Date. In my opinion, the Roles Sub seem seems to hold its value better and be an iconic classic. The newer seamster mc is a great throwback with awesome new technology, but in person, lacked a certain wow factor (at least for me) which lead to the Omega 300 Diver/PO vs Rolex Sub debate. I can't tell you one over the other because I haven't decided myself yet, but I'll say if you want vintage design with newest technology...you can't beat the Seamster 300 MC....if you want kind of classic design and reliable and great movement still... go rolex SubC....if you were considering an older Rolex I'd say you have classic design and great movement, but your trading a new watch and modern technology movement/anti-magnetism for a classic go to. I, myself, am still debating a new Diver 300 vs older Rolex 14060.

OMGRLX · May 11, 2016

Alpha
Fortunate to have both and far short of a review I would say the Sub is the most comfortable wearer of the two.

Interesting..is your assessment based on both the watch and the band and how they feel on your wrist?
I wore a friend's sub on its original band once. Still think my old sm300, on a mesh band, is more comfortable, for me at least

Submariner vs Seamaster 300 Request

Hands90

jcmartinez98

wx_073

Jensop

Alpha

alam

Alpha

alam

Huus

Syrte

Perseus

Perseus

Alpha

Travelller

WatchVaultNYC

flw

KJE23

OMGRLX

Similar threads

Seamaster 300 Big Triangle Vs. Seamaster CK 2913

first Omega: Constellation vs Seamaster

Seamaster vs Seamaster Chronometer

Choosing Between Seamaster Aqua Terra 38mm vs Seamaster 300m

Poll | Seamaster trilogy vs Seamaster 300 vs Diver

Aqua terra vs Seamaster 300