Speedy Pro and water resistance...

Posts
196
Likes
167
Would I take my 15lb road bike on a gnarly mountain bike trail? Or skeet shooting with a bolt action rifle? Cross country skiing with a snowboard? I could go on.
 
Posts
16,780
Likes
47,516
Aahhh the do anything watch.

 
Posts
17,778
Likes
26,953
Call me biased but I'm not sure why every watch person does not have an SKX 007/009. True beater and iso dive rated. They look great and the more beat up they get the better they look. Coming in under 200 bucks on a bracelet they only problem is not buying more then the value of the watch in straps.
 
Posts
16,780
Likes
47,516
Aahhh the done everything watch

 
Posts
1,155
Likes
591
Ahhh the "when I was dodging shells in Verdun your company wasn't even founded" watch...

 
Posts
669
Likes
1,231
Our Company was founded in 1848 (no it was not "Louis Brandt & Fr猫res", but it is a swiss company). So it was founded before that...
 
Posts
1,155
Likes
591
Omega is one of those old watch companies, as opposed to most of the existing brands... 馃榾
 
Posts
2,828
Likes
4,717
Omega is one of those old watch companies, as opposed to most of the existing brands... 馃榾
So is Seiko, founded in 1881.
 
Posts
1,870
Likes
1,402
I understand that one of the NASA tests was for the watch to be waterproof and the reason that the Breitling navitimer was dropped was it's failure when it got wet after landing. I'm sure that a modern speedy pro is fine in water and if the seals are ok on an older watch it would be fine as well. They aren't dive watches though.
Not true. There was no NASA test for the watch to be waterproof. See here for the long rundown of tests:
http://www.timeandwatches.com/p/history-of-omega-speedmaster.html
There was a "relative humidity" test. And there was no "landing" test at all as any launch is prohibitively expensive.
As for the whole "Swimming with Speedy" I'll say it again - you can, but why would you? It's not designed to be a dive watch. You COULD go on a 10-mile run with Ferragamos but it's not advisable.
 
Posts
785
Likes
651
The 3573 is water resistant to 50m so unless you swim like Michael Phelps you should be fine if you've had your seals tested recently.

Because nothing kills a watch faster than water I'd take something more appropriate.
 
Posts
118
Likes
59
If you're so terribly worried about swimming why don't you just get a cheap Seiko 5sport or a Seamaster quartz. That ain't much money either. Then just swap to your precious Speedy for showing off att the bar....馃槈

Oh..oops...I was snowboarding wth my Seamaster馃槻 Should I get a Project Alaska for below zero sports
 
Posts
2,828
Likes
4,717
If you're so terribly worried about swimming why don't you just get a cheap Seiko 5sport or a Seamaster quartz. That ain't much money either. Then just swap to your precious Speedy for showing off att the bar....馃槈

Oh..oops...I was snowboarding wth my Seamaster馃槻 Should I get a Project Alaska for below zero sports
I don't know what bars you frequent, but I've never felt the need to show off any watch, anywhere.
 
Posts
162
Likes
71
I wouldn't chance it, when on vacation I always just wear a casio, less of a headache. If you wouldn't lose any sleep over losing the watch then by all means.
 
Posts
6,119
Likes
45,457
I never have been inclined to get my watches wet, but then I have no imagination.
 
Posts
99
Likes
114
Given that have to wind your speedmaster every day, my suspicion would be that the crown seal might wear more quickly than say an automatic watch that you don't have to wind every day. Add in the fact that it doesn't have a screw down crown for extra protection, it doesn't seem like the most logical choice for submersion.

I'm sure if you test your watch for water resistance regularly then it would be fine, but I suspect few of us get that done as frequently as we should. I for one never swim with my speedie, though that may also be due to the fact that neither are easily replaceable (old style snoopy and vintage).
 
Posts
1,187
Likes
1,859
I second the beater alternative for vacation and especially for swimming. Why take the risk?
 
Posts
138
Likes
796
Before I a Wis I only had one watch , the speedie reduced and wore it every day and night. Showered with it, swam with it even occasionally snorkled with it.. No problems until one day I noticed a chrono pusher had fallen off. The problem is that I happened to be in my pool at the time!! Water entered in a big way. The watch stopped and I thought it was all over! I started looking for a replacement and this is what pushed me over to becoming a Wis. I sent my speedie to omega to see what the damage was. To my surprise they decided to repair it as it had been serviced by them within the previous 12 months . thank God!! They did replaced everything apart from the case and bracelet.

Well the message is that a watch is waterproof until it's not! And then you are in trouble.
Edited:
 
Posts
118
Likes
59
I don't know what bars you frequent, but I've never felt the need to show off any watch, anywhere.
Wow, Dennis, no offence 馃憤 I don麓t frequent in any bars but I happen to have a summer house on the south west archipelago of Finland. So water is pretty much everywhere and salty. That麓s why I have an SMPcc besides I do prefer Seamasters. And no bars anywhere near to show-off 馃榿 just tried to say that buy the right watch for your activities. Don麓t take an expensive Speedy to the beach, I don麓t take my SMP for fishing, I take my beater Seiko.
 
Posts
17
Likes
5
Reminds of the time where I posted this chart on WUS in a similar topic:

omega-water-resistance-screenshot-2014-06-30-09-21-39-jpg.63428

That swimming guy there?

Someone actually argued that he was "wading".

WADING!!!

WADING!!!

Shortly thereafter I came to OF. Haven't looked back.

You can clearly see that the guy "wading" has his left hand out of the water. Obviously all warrantees are void if you can't follow directions. 馃槈