Speedmaster calibers 321 vs 861 vs 1861

Posts
2,844
Likes
2,437
Is that Manuel Yazijian? If so, that might explain a lot...
Richardew referred me to Manny when I found out you couldn't service my cal.321. I take it that's a good recommendation馃榾
 
Posts
1,567
Likes
859
If you go through Omega, they have to be done at Bienne, and the price is higher than with an 861 or 1861. If you go with an independent, then you will pay whatever they feel it's worth for their time. Might be the same as an 861, or could be more.

With regards to parts, the parts listed above (with the exception of the mainspring) are case parts, and these are not a problem to get - they are all readily available from Omega, and I buy them frequently. To say, based on those parts he listed, that there are no issues getting parts for a Cal. 321 is very misleading. Although many movement parts are available through Omega to anyone with an account, a lot of critical parts are not as Omega chooses to withhold them. So if you need an escape wheel, pallet fork, balance complete, some chronograph springs, various plates or bridges, etc. then you are out of luck. You will have to rely on the open market and hope you can find these parts at a reasonable price, if at all.

Now not every watch needs a part that can't be obtained easily, in fact it's sort of rare that they are needed. However because you have had a 321 repaired, replaced a few case parts, and didn't need anything that was discontinued obviously does not mean every part for the watch is easy to get...

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
1,567
Likes
859
Did Buzz Aldrin have a cal. 861 or 321 when he walked on the moon?
 
Posts
1,567
Likes
859
321, a 105.012

I always though he had a 861 as it changed over to that calibre in 1968. Wow so the cal 321 is in truth the original one that went to the moon.
 
Posts
30,970
Likes
36,376
I always though he had a 861 as it changed over to that calibre in 1968. Wow so the cal 321 is in truth the original one that went to the moon.
NASA bought theirs in batches, not just on the month of the mission, so even the last watch on the moon, Gene Cernan's on Apollo 17 was a 105.012-66CB Cal 321
 
Posts
1,567
Likes
859
NASA bought theirs in batches, not just on the month of the mission, so even the last watch on the moon, Gene Cernan's on Apollo 17 was a 105.012-66CB Cal 321
Yes of course that makes sense, so the 321 is the real deal. By comparison today the dial only remains, the bracket is different and the movement is based on the original movement with differences.
 
Posts
28,059
Likes
71,647
Richardew referred me to Manny when I found out you couldn't service my cal.321. I take it that's a good recommendation馃榾

If it is him, my comment had nothing to do with his skills...
 
Posts
15
Likes
48
Who has had trouble getting parts or service for a c321? I haven't. Omega will service the c321 and it is more expensive and has to be done in Bienne. I get mine done locally and it costs exactly the same to service a c321 as a c861. I haven't had any issues getting parts either: crowns, pushers, crystals, gaskets, mainspring. I wear them regularly. They are all robust movements/watches that have passed the NASA tests. The challenge in collecting/owning c321 speedys is in finding ones that have all or most of the original parts that differ from modern replacements: bezels, hands, dial.
Here's an c864. It's a chronometer version of the c861


Here's some shots of the c321:
Where could I obtain a display back for a c321 piece?
 
Posts
838
Likes
3,269
Just read through this thread as I was further educating myself (through Search of course) on the fundamental differences between the 321 and 861 movements.

This thread should be sticky'd. Its quite good, thanks to @Archer for his contributions and knowledge.
 
Posts
162
Likes
71
Are the current batch of watches going to outer space such as Scott Kelly's speedmaster using the 1861 movement?
 
Posts
1,174
Likes
1,754
Sorry for the old thread bump - but I am trying to figure out if a 321 dial would fit onto a 861/1861 movement (sacrilege aside) and cant see it covered here.
 
Posts
28,059
Likes
71,647
Sorry for the old thread bump - but I am trying to figure out if a 321 dial would fit onto a 861/1861 movement (sacrilege aside) and cant see it covered here.

Not a straight swap - dial feet would have to be modified or removed...
 
Posts
28,059
Likes
71,647
So you want to create a frankenwatch?
 
Posts
1,174
Likes
1,754
So you want to create a frankenwatch?

Yes, I suppose that is what it would be.

I have an 861 in pretty good condition, though the bezel and hands are not correct for the watch. Given that what I have is not original (and I have no desire to search for the correct hands and bezel as I now have an immaculate one from the same period), I was just assessing my options. Sell it on or franken it into something else. It wouldn't be done to deceive anyone or anything. I just loved the raised Omega symbols on the 321 dials.
 
Posts
3,247
Likes
6,332
Yes, I suppose that is what it would be.

I have an 861 in pretty good condition, though the bezel and hands are not correct for the watch. Given that what I have is not original (and I have no desire to search for the correct hands and bezel as I now have an immaculate one from the same period), I was just assessing my options. Sell it on or franken it into something else. It wouldn't be done to deceive anyone or anything. I just loved the raised Omega symbols on the 321 dials.

If that's what you like why not? Go for it!
Edited: