- Posts
- 160
- Likes
- 180
QBranch
·Is it worth the hype? Can’t stop looking for one… the urge is real
Q QBranchIs it worth the hype? Can’t stop looking for one… the urge is real
It’s not enough different from the standard 300 MC that I could justify the more than 2x price increase on the used market.
Brush out the bracelet and it's just about 1:1.
I think the 12 is much better than the Omega logo prominently featured. Oh yeah... I guess it has the countdown bezel, too. I dunno. I use mine in the water a good bit. I prefer the more recognizable diver style. Six of one...
The OG Master 300 was kind of a dream watch for me when it was new*. I passed up on the Submariner to get one, back when you could get them at nearer the same price.
*still is.
How’s that Omega nato holding up- just got one
Ya I just got one and so far am pleased with it. Yet I will say it is a bit short for my 7 1/4” wrist without wetsuit.
It’s nice to see an Omega used for what it was designed for. To many are delicately worn at the office with a Diaper under it and a Qtip for detailing after a tough day of desk diving. Kudos to ya for actually diving with it.
Ps-What are your thoughts on Shiny items like an watch attracting predator fish? Another inter web assumption?
It’s not enough different from the standard 300 MC that I could justify the more than 2x price increase on the used market.
G gpstarI agree with others, it is not worth the extra price when the differences are minor. I use mine in the water so the Spectre never crossed my mind (I wanted a dive bezel), and I prefer the 12 vs the oversized Omega logo.
Q QBranchIs it worth the hype? Can’t stop looking for one… the urge is real
I think it depends on why you want one. If you're into collecting Bond watches, then yes it's probably worth it. Otherwise, it's hard to justify the price over a standard heritage 300 as others have stated.
In my case, I wanted the Spectre when it was first released and had a chance to buy one back then. But I passed, as I had just bought another Omega a few months before and felt the Spectre was very expensive. Another thing I didn't like about it was it sits very tall on the wrist, at nearly 15mm thick. However, it's a decision I regret as the Spectre has since appreciated greatly above its suggested retail and I personally feel it's still the nicest looking of the heritage Seamasters.
Having said that, I've never really had the urge to actually hunt one down since passing on it during its initial release. Because there's always some other "new" watch that catches my interest. For example, if Omega were to do a re-issue of their 60's classic Seamaster, I'd take that in a heartbeat over the Spectre.
I bought one from a second-hand dealer and the crown was broken off during shipping or before (who knows so sent it back). Killed my lust for the watch, but I do still like it. Does sit pretty tall but overall a quality watch. The lollipop tip on the second hand is pretty hard to beat too!
Q QBranchYep it’s the lollipop hand and bezel for me that is the draw.
I do like the look of the seamaster 300 trilogy as well which seems to be another classic looking watch that is much cheaper than the Spectre
The Seamaster Trilogy would be my choice for looks and size, I prefer its smaller 39mm width.