- Posts
- 1,567
- Likes
- 859
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
This is one for members and Mr Archer in particular.
There has been a post by myself before regarding if my Omega Geneve is a redial. At first it had appeared it was a redial, then members had not been sure due to other examples on the net of geneve dials looking exactly like mine.
What do you think Mr Archer?
Below is a link to the previous thread where regarding my delema also stefan the other watchmaker on the forum initialy thought it was a redial. However, have sent him a link to the previous thread for him to look at.
https://omegaforums.net/threads/any-ideas.23649/
Also a link below to a similar watch sold by austin kaye, it is not stated as a redial. They always in their adverts state if a watch is a redial or not. It looks just like my dial.
http://austinkaye.co.uk/vintage-omega-geneve-manual?back=
Thank you
Patrick Paul J
Another nit to pick: They do outsource a handful of small parts. Only Seiko, who even makes their own screws and oils, are COMPLETELY in-house.
The Swiss created the better conditions for business, and then once the industry is rolling it is just a matter of convineance to keep the industry located there.
Btw when Gator says they were inbred, he's talking in the corporate sense, rather than the Lannister sense.
Another nit to pick: They do outsource a handful of small parts. Only Seiko, who even makes their own screws and oils, are COMPLETELY in-house.
Maybe it's just another "Senior Moment" but I was under the impression that Lange manufactured their own parts, including the screws.
However, with Seiko making their own oils, is way over the top!
I'll answer your question, but sorry it probably won't be the answer you want...
First the short answer:
The other members here who have spent hundreds of hours researching dial variations of very specific models are the experts on this subject matter. If they have given you the benefit of all their research and experience looking at tens of thousands of dials, and have commented on the dial in question, then you already have the best opinions available on this site.
Now the longer answer with some explanation:
Quite honestly, I don't have time to do the sort of research that the collectors here do, and since a question I get today might be related to a modern watch, tomorrow morning it will be about a vintage Speedmaster, and tomorrow afternoon a vintage watch like yours, etc. it's impossible for me or anyone to be an expert in all of these with regards to originality of dials, hands, crowns, etc.. You will notice given enough time here that specific members are experts in specific watches, but I don't think anyone here knows everything about all the Omega models. Some are experts in Constellations, some in 30 mm movement watches, some in art deco watches, some in Speedmasters, etc. Omega is a brand with a lot of ground to cover to put I mildly.
My expertise is as a watchmaker, so a question regarding problems with movements, parts, what's involved with a service, etc. are what I am good at, so that is what I stick to. When I am repairing a watch for someone, if the dial is original or not is actually mostly irrelevant to the work I have to perform. When someone PM's me about the originality of a dial for example, I almost always refer them to the forum for more information, since the guys on here are the experts in this area.
It might not answer your question directly, but it should allow you to understand how the forum works with regards to questions like yours.
Cheers, Al
Keep the wisdom flowing, gents!The fact that most of the world's watch parts suppliers were there had nothing to do with it? 馃槈 Even the old American companies that marked movements "USA" bought a lot of the parts in from Switzerland.
Maybe it's just another "Senior Moment" but I was under the impression that Lange manufactured their own parts, including the screws.
However, with Seiko making their own oils, is way over the top!
Watches being luxury items + Swiss way of banking = Good business prospects, right?