- Posts
- 1,567
- Likes
- 859
PatrickJ
·If you are still learning you should not telling new members that you think his watch is a redial and will no longer respond to you if you insist on acting like a child!🤨
Solid gold or plated?
- Posts
- 13,310
- Likes
- 18,424
gatorcpa
··ΩF InvestiGatorHere is information from Omega Vintage Database on Ref. 198.(0)003:
https://www.omegawatches.com/planet-omega/heritage/vintage-details/15205/
It is listed as part of the Constellation series, but note that dial shown does not say Constellation.
I think this is one of those instances where the same watch was marketed by Omega under different model names in different parts of the world. I do not think it is a redial, that's just how it was made.
It is identical in all material respects to the Constellations shown in the catalog above and the non-Constellation shown in the picture on the Omega database.
Hope this helps,
gatorcpa
https://www.omegawatches.com/planet-omega/heritage/vintage-details/15205/
It is listed as part of the Constellation series, but note that dial shown does not say Constellation.
I think this is one of those instances where the same watch was marketed by Omega under different model names in different parts of the world. I do not think it is a redial, that's just how it was made.
It is identical in all material respects to the Constellations shown in the catalog above and the non-Constellation shown in the picture on the Omega database.
Hope this helps,
gatorcpa
- Posts
- 2,828
- Likes
- 4,722
dennisthemenace
·If you are still learning then you should not be telling new members that you think their watch is a redial and will no longer respond to you if you insist on acting like a child!🤨
- Posts
- 1,567
- Likes
- 859
- Posts
- 1,567
- Likes
- 859
PatrickJ
·Maybe the OP's father bought it grey market.
- Posts
- 1,567
- Likes
- 859
PatrickJ
·To the OP beware of this place. You can see I tried to help and the crap I have had to face as a result. I am glad your watch is good.
- Posts
- 7,337
- Likes
- 25,633
Hijak
·Your the child you arrogant wind up merchant. I stated when I said redial it was an initial response that can change and "I hope I am wrong". Remember I am also a new member that has been here only 9 months, you treated me very badly when I came on the forum Mr Hijak from day one. But the truth is clear and I see right through you Hijak.
For posterity!🙄
- Posts
- 2,828
- Likes
- 4,722
- Posts
- 1,567
- Likes
- 859
PatrickJ
·Are you referring to the image labeled BA1980003?
I regret that I have no concrete background information on this watch. It might have been a gift. However, if my father bought it, there would be a reasonable possibility that he purchased it while he was stationed at several countries in Europe. I'm not sure when we moved back to the U.S. (I was in college and the folks were still in Germany). Possibly as early as 1972.
Thank you,
Richard
Your watch is good Cincidela is an expert.
- Posts
- 1,567
- Likes
- 859
PatrickJ
·
- Posts
- 5,270
- Likes
- 78,643
Barking mad
··Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder
Patrick, with the greatest respect you need to settle down a bit. I have been on the forum for a bit over two years now and had nothing but support but I have also been careful when I give advice that I am confident of my knowledge.
- Posts
- 1,567
- Likes
- 859
PatrickJ
·Here is information from Omega Vintage Database on Ref. 198.(0)003:
https://www.omegawatches.com/planet-omega/heritage/vintage-details/15205/
It is listed as part of the Constellation series, but note that dial shown does not say Constellation.
I think this is one of those instances where the same watch was marketed by Omega under different model names in different parts of the world. I do not think it is a redial, that's just how it was made.
It is identical in all material respects to the Constellations shown in the catalog above and the non-Constellation shown in the picture on the Omega database.
Hope this helps,
gatorcpa
Good info👍
- Posts
- 2,959
- Likes
- 6,317
Modest_Proposal
·I inherited my father's watches, one of which is an Omega f300 Electronic. I do not know its age, although I'm sure it is at least 30 years old, probably more.
I had the back removed and on the inside is stamped 18K, and other information, such as a serial number. I've been assuming it's gold plated and probably not worth repairing (the date no longer advances). However, it seemed wise to try to check on this.
Doing a web search did not reveal much, if any, useful information about the f300 series.
Thank you,
Richard
Just to clarify once and for all, rg1911, you will be pleased to know that your watch is 18k solid gold. If you have further questions about it, let us know.
Don't be scared off by the bickering going on in this thread. I assure you is almost never seen and I apologize on behalf of the forum for its assault on your eyes!
- Posts
- 13,310
- Likes
- 18,424
gatorcpa
··ΩF InvestiGator
Patrick -
You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. Or in other words:
Just gotta do your homework and couch your language so that when you are wrong (and we all have made mistakes here), you state things as opinion, not as absolute fact.
When it comes to vintage Omega, there really is no such thing as absolute fact.
gatorcpa
You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. Or in other words:
And in the end, the love you take,
Is equal to the love you make.
- The Beatles
Just gotta do your homework and couch your language so that when you are wrong (and we all have made mistakes here), you state things as opinion, not as absolute fact.
When it comes to vintage Omega, there really is no such thing as absolute fact.
gatorcpa
- Posts
- 1,567
- Likes
- 859
PatrickJ
·Patrick, with the greatest respect you need to settle down a bit. I have been on the forum for a bit over two years now and had nothing but support but I have also been careful when I give advice that I am confident of my knowledge.
- Posts
- 1,567
- Likes
- 859
PatrickJ
·Patrick -
You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. Or in other words:
Just gotta do your homework and couch your language so that when you are wrong (and we all have made mistakes here), you state things as opinion, not as absolute fact.
When it comes to vintage Omega, there really is no such thing as absolute fact.
gatorcpa
This is what I stated to the OP "At this early stage my suspicion is the watch has been redialled at some stage." Early suspicion means I think it is.... but am willing to find out. I did not say his watch was a 100% beyond doubt redial. I left it open. I have seen members on the forum say just one word in there past responses that is "REDIAL" and later they change their mind when new evidence comes to light. Look how diplomatic I was in my choice of words and look how I have been abused by respected members as a result.
- Posts
- 15,048
- Likes
- 24,057
cicindela
··Steve @ ΩFPatrick, everyone understands you were trying to help. But many times it is better to use a little restraint. I can't tell you how many times I have been tempted to post an answer about Constellations, but decided to wait a bit and see what others have to say. Then along comes Hoi with his encyclopedia brain and saves me from embarrassment. We are all learning everyday. Sometimes things meant to be helpful can scare the crap out of someone who does not know watches. Even, "I hope I'm wrong", can sound ominous to to these folks. Slow down, you don't have to save the watch world in a day. Years from now you will look back and realize how much learned.
- Posts
- 1,567
- Likes
- 859
PatrickJ
·I am sorry the OP took my comments the wrong way. I have explained myself enough to people here regarding my intentions. To be fair a few earlier attacking members owe me an apology here. I had good intentions and have been made to look bad and treated in a disgusting manner on the forum.
- Posts
- 2,959
- Likes
- 6,317
Modest_Proposal
·There was wrong doing on both sides, here. IMO it started with the incendiary comment by Hijack...
"I only responded for the benefit of the original poster. Your uneducated comments are disturbing...you should "do your homework" before you make them!"
and then was taken over full blast by Patrick with his later shouts. It takes two to tango and in this case, both sides could have done better, I think.
"I only responded for the benefit of the original poster. Your uneducated comments are disturbing...you should "do your homework" before you make them!"
and then was taken over full blast by Patrick with his later shouts. It takes two to tango and in this case, both sides could have done better, I think.
- Posts
- 2,828
- Likes
- 4,722
dennisthemenace
·Patrick, We all love a tryer here but you really should try to curb your tendency of opening your mouth before engaging your brain.
Similar threads
- Posts
- 2
- Views
- 141
- Posts
- 18
- Views
- 419
- Posts
- 6
- Views
- 691
- Posts
- 9
- Views
- 2K
- Posts
- 0
- Views
- 383