Seamaster 168.022 / 166.028 Orange Seconds Hand - A Thread

Posts
2,526
Likes
2,919
There are many companion watches though when you pay attention, this might as well be a companion, but I don't think it's Ultraman Speedmaster's
 
Posts
262
Likes
522
And maybe I should say... a good one. It's definitely had a life.
 
Posts
867
Likes
3,729
No need to apologize, thanks for sharing it. I saw this as well and thought about creating a place for a discussion on it. Rather than creating another thread, this is as good a place as any. Posting the photo from the listing for others to see it. Also, thanks to @dsio for finding this one and for posting all the others that you post in the Recommended Vintage Omega Watches on eBay Thread!
img_7687-jpeg.1610234

DISCLAIMER: I have no affiliation with the seller or the watch, nor am I interested in purchasing it myself, I just have a soft spot for these Concentric Circles Dial with orange seconds and black hour/minute hands Seamaster references and thought it could be a fun discussion. I've only thought of sharing my observations in the hopes of providing assistance to any would be interested buyer.

I'm in no way an expert on these Seamaster ref. 166.028 but after adding two of these Concentric Circles Dial with orange seconds Seamasters to my collection and spending a significant amount of time scavenging the internet for these, I noticed a couple things on the example that was posted over in the above linked thread and after @b-lilja posted, I thought I'd share some thoughts / open it up for discussion.

Let's start off with as they say, the good. Case appears to be in a well worn conditioned, agreed that the watch has definitely had a life with some small knicks here and there but over all pretty decent. Brushing on the side of the case appears to still be visible. Correct crown looks to be there as well just again in well enjoyed condition.


From the style of the signed Omega symbol in the crystal, it looks to be a replacement at some point but it appears to be in good condition, so no red flags there. See last image regarding the arrow. The dial and markings appear to be in really good condition as well as the applied Omega logo adjacent to the 12 o'clock position.


The movement is definitely in need of a servicing but apart from some rotor rub, there isn't anything there that would hold me back if I was in search for one of these.


While the watch appears to be in a well enjoyed, honest condition what made me pause was the lume plots and the hour minute hand lume. I couldn't say with certainty that the dial and hands have been relumed, but I also wouldn't say I'm sure it's original . With the Magenta arrows, I've pointed out a few plots that are the most irregular in shape/size/placement compared to what I've seen in the past. The size is usually uniform other than 12 o'clock position lume and the plots are typically centered on the indexes. Additionally the lume at the both the minute and the hour hands looks to have an uneven application. Lastly, the color of the tritium lume appears more on the white side which differs significantly to the other examples I have seen with original lume that tend to patina to a more rich creamy yellow (this could just be due to the lighting of the photos). It should be noted that the seller makes to statement to or against the watch being relumed.

That said, from what I've seen on many references and true of one of mine, the lume on these hands and even the lume plots on the dial have a knack for falling off / out of placement. So a relumed watch may not uncommon for this reference and that also may be a deal breaker for a potential buyer but I figured it was worth noting.

I wonder though, what do you all think of this example? Did anyone notice anything else?
 
Posts
96
Likes
102
Gambled this from Japanese Yahoo Auctions. Unfortunately buckle was not genuine (says gold plated, yet stainless steel)
 
Posts
2,526
Likes
2,919
I think I’ve seen this one too

Don’t know why a steel watch has a plated buckle but Japanese original Omega buckles just say Stainless Steel or Gold Plated and nothing else
 
Posts
214
Likes
449
Does anyone have a part number on the crown?

I recently purchased this watch and would like to replace the unmarked crown with a correct one.

Thank you all for the input on the correct bracelet! I am not sure I am ready to move on a 1067 but will enjoy the watch as is for now (hopefully with a new crown though).

x1821887-66993dde32ac87f3d033bf24c4b6d72a.jpg.pagespeed.ic.sfMN6gnTp0.webp
x1822132-2d4d541d8ad43053aa308e19d84671a9.jpg.pagespeed.ic.xtFFEnGCgG.webp x1822131-088e006f13c53ca67113539af4cc5a59.jpg.pagespeed.ic.MLCn-hjgdI.webp
 
Posts
867
Likes
3,729
Does anyone have a part number on the crown?

I recently purchased this watch and would like to replace the unmarked crown with a correct one.

Thank you all for the input on the correct bracelet! I am not sure I am ready to move on a 1067 but will enjoy the watch as is for now (hopefully with a new crown though).

x1821887-66993dde32ac87f3d033bf24c4b6d72a.jpg.pagespeed.ic.sfMN6gnTp0.webp
x1822132-2d4d541d8ad43053aa308e19d84671a9.jpg.pagespeed.ic.xtFFEnGCgG.webp x1822131-088e006f13c53ca67113539af4cc5a59.jpg.pagespeed.ic.MLCn-hjgdI.webp
Congrats on the purchase! There is a list somewhere here on a thread that lists out all the vintage case references and the correct crown replacement part number. I think it’s a crown, gasket, crystal list. I have the link bookmarked on my personal laptop but I’m abroad for work now so don’t have it easy to reach. A quick google search associated to the forum will find it pretty quickly.
 
Posts
214
Likes
449
Follow up on the bracelet…

I believe this is the 166.028 version (not 168.022 since it does not say Chronometer). The reference from the forum has different sets of end links for the same bracelet… shouldn’t they be the same if they are to the same case? Would the 166.028 and 168.022 have different cases?!

 
Posts
3,411
Likes
7,318
Follow up on the bracelet…

I believe this is the 166.028 version (not 168.022 since it does not say Chronometer). The reference from the forum has different sets of end links for the same bracelet… shouldn’t they be the same if they are to the same case? Would the 166.028 and 168.022 have different cases?!


Chronometre and Non-Chronometre share absolutely the same case... so no worry
 
Posts
214
Likes
449
Any idea/explanation for the differences in end links?

It’s not a huge issue for me since im leaning towards the 1098 both of which have 450 end links. But why would the 1172 have 515 for one and 538 for the other?
 
Posts
607
Likes
623
Any idea/explanation for the differences in end links?

It’s not a huge issue for me since im leaning towards the 1098 both of which have 450 end links. But why would the 1172 have 515 for one and 538 for the other?

This has come up in the past. Nobody knows why as far as I know. I’ve seen both and they look similar. There are many such quirks with answers that are lost to time.

BTW, there is one more bracelet option that is not reflected in the official list. The 1175/48 combination is what is seen in the olympics advertisement posted earlier in the thread. I’m not sure if it was common internationally, but I see it a lot on US/Mexico watches.
 
Posts
21,661
Likes
49,088
Any idea/explanation for the differences in end links?

It’s not a huge issue for me since im leaning towards the 1098 both of which have 450 end links. But why would the 1172 have 515 for one and 538 for the other?
Maybe because those were the endlinks provided with those references. But as noted above, they are interchangeable.