Forums Latest Members

Your thoughts and advices on this Seamaster 166.028 168.022 cal. 564 chronometer certified

  1. vlaspri Dec 15, 2020

    Posts
    367
    Likes
    251
    Hi all!

    I am currently in the market for a Seamaster 166.028 and I recently found a goldcapped one locally. This is a double reference 166.028 168.022 with cal. 564 chronometer certified inside. The seller asks 800 Euro (970 USD) so i have some doubts on that price. Can you please share your thoughts or some advices whether to buy it or not.

    A couple things I see from pics provided by the seller:

    The case looks unpolished, but there is a small dent on the bezel at the 7 o'clock and the bigger one on the lug.

    Dial looks like original and all of the hands either. Crystal has engraved Omega logo.

    Movement is cal. 564 which is certified chronometer and I believe is more desirable than a non-chronometer one.

    Any thoughts are welcome.

    dc06419e1a6b6e8d367465fb5d906a6a.jpg 1.png 2.png 3.png 4.png 5.png
     
  2. Dimitris Dec 15, 2020

    Posts
    227
    Likes
    790
    Watch looks okay except those two big dents on the left bottom leg and on the bezel, the reason for that price I guess is that although this caliber is chronometer certified this dial arrangement and reference is not very popular amongst collectors.
     
    vlaspri likes this.
  3. jB1128 Dec 15, 2020

    Posts
    721
    Likes
    9,609
    It is probably just fine, blurry photos aside and the cosmetic issues noted above, if you are committed to acquiring this reference in gold cap. The movement looks really clean, but probably will require a full service.

    If you like this reference though, I would opt to get this fully serviced, stainless steel example from an established forum member here: https://omegaforums.net/threads/omega-seamaster-chronometer-ref-168-022-serviced-795.123695/

    Good luck!
     
    iamvr, Longbow, vlaspri and 1 other person like this.
  4. masteroftime Dec 15, 2020

    Posts
    461
    Likes
    451
    That linked watch is a great bargain. I'm still surprised these aren't more popular.
     
    vlaspri and jB1128 like this.
  5. Braindrain Dec 15, 2020

    Posts
    731
    Likes
    1,274
    I thought it was an awesome watch.

    PSX_20180911_104028.jpg
     
  6. vlaspri Dec 16, 2020

    Posts
    367
    Likes
    251
    jB1128 likes this.
  7. tgeekb Dec 17, 2020

    Posts
    42
    Likes
    29
    If not for the dents but, perhaps, it gives it character!
    Let us know how it goes.
     
    vlaspri likes this.
  8. ConElPueblo Dec 17, 2020

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    vlaspri, iamvr, Zapatta and 1 other person like this.
  9. jB1128 Dec 17, 2020

    Posts
    721
    Likes
    9,609
  10. vlaspri Dec 18, 2020

    Posts
    367
    Likes
    251
  11. vlaspri Dec 22, 2020

    Posts
    367
    Likes
    251
    Well, I've seen the watch with my own eyes and these 'small' dents do really bother me. You know this feeling when something is not 'yours'? This what happened. So the watch remained in hands of seller.

    Thanks for your opinins dear OF members.