Ever since the 321 was announced I've been trying to get my hands on its bracelet to try and fit it to my Trilogy Railmaster. Today, I was able to do just that – and I am quite satisfied with the results.
View attachment 1270115
One thing that has recently bothered me about the original bracelet, aside from its thickness and untapered profile, is the difference in the width of the center links compared to the original. On the Trilogy bracelets, the center link is 12mm wide, whereas the original flat links, as well as the 321's, are 10mm.
View attachment 1270105
On the wrist, the bracelet is comfortable. While I didn't mind the chunkiness of the original, I do feel that the light and supple quality of the 321's bracelet is a huge improvement. It also doesn't hurt that it makes the watch a more accurate aesthetic approximation of vintage 2914s.
View attachment 1270110
With that thought, I've said pretty much all I have to say. It's a fantastic bracelet, and I'd recommend people take a look at it if they get the opportunity to.
Some hastily taken beauty shots:
View attachment 1270106
View attachment 1270113
View attachment 1270114
Many thanks to the Fashion Valley OB for being great to work with, as always!
Click to expand...