- Posts
- 670
- Likes
- 6,560
keepsonticking
·If there is a similar thread, I couldn't find it. I bought a Speedmaster Trilogy in 2017 and have loved it from day one til now. It looks great and wears well. The call back to the first Speedmaster is nice, too, and allows one to wear a very close approximation of the original. This week I picked up the Seamaster Trilogy, finally, and it does not disappoint. It's a beautiful piece that feels substantial and comfortable.
It feels like the time for this set is getting near...the time when the limited number made land with collectors who will not sell them. These are not just homage watches. They are attractive, high- quality watches that can stand alone, without the history. I'm on the hunt for a Railmaster now, preferably one that has enough wear that I won't want to lock it away without wearing it.
So let's see all of those beautiful Trilogy 57 watches, even the ones with the extra text on the dials that came in the sets (which will likely never be worn). And for those who have always complained about the faux-tina, I have to say I can't imagine how cold and sterile these would feel without the extra color. It is simply part of the watches and absolutely adds a warmth they would otherwise be without.
It feels like the time for this set is getting near...the time when the limited number made land with collectors who will not sell them. These are not just homage watches. They are attractive, high- quality watches that can stand alone, without the history. I'm on the hunt for a Railmaster now, preferably one that has enough wear that I won't want to lock it away without wearing it.
So let's see all of those beautiful Trilogy 57 watches, even the ones with the extra text on the dials that came in the sets (which will likely never be worn). And for those who have always complained about the faux-tina, I have to say I can't imagine how cold and sterile these would feel without the extra color. It is simply part of the watches and absolutely adds a warmth they would otherwise be without.
Edited:
