Hi OF, I am the owner of the PAF rm and I suggest Joel to open this thread. I am not even talking with the trade deal now as it is quite obvious now that we will not move on but now I am more interested to understand and confirm what the issue are ( I will.keep it as a beater btw ).. The idea was to answer some questions we had after we discovered the issue above. As a fool, I only rely on white light lume test and visual inspection when I got this watch. As Joel state, dial and hands really behave like old radium / tritium after white light exposure but the UV lamp test and the geiger count clearly show it is not. So can we all agree that the dial and hands were relumed? Or is there any other people having seen some dead radium / tritium behaving like this in the past? (Just asking..).
Amazing, wonderful thread. Open, honest, educational. Thanks to all participants, especially OP and @Fost
(End of interruption.) 🍿
FWIW I have some nos 1960’s Rolex parts that definitely have original lume but don’t respond to UV. Don’t think I’ve seen that with Omega though (yet.)
It looks like tritium, but doesn't glow under uv. Should it?
I for one would love some feedback about this key point..
If it was radium it would definitely light up on the geiger so that is ruled out. Different luminescent compounds mixed with tritium provide the 'reaction' to UV, so it's likely that if it doesn't glow it is one of those compounds. I don't know the nature of the different mixtures off hand but it's likely similar to the late 60's and 70's Rolexes that are tritium but have no UV response.
interesting. so it is possible it's tritium even though it doesn't light up under UV? Is there any way to tell definitively (yeah, i know... probably not.)
Yes, definitely possible. Here's are a few threads I had marked from Rolex Forums on the subject.
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=123465
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=31836&highlight=tritium gieger
Neither helps with the second question but, even if the half-life of tritium is shorter than the age of the watch, it should still have some low level Geiger reading as the half-life only corresponds to a 1/2 loss of the degrading compound. I can't tell you what a tritium geiger reading should be but, given the number of great watches you have you can probably compare readings from those to this one.
If the tritium is diluted during the relumed, can this affect the geiger count? I am.asking because the glowing is very low after white light exposure and this make me think it could be low concentration tritium... Or something else
if you relume with water based tritium and cover the plots after that with dried and re watered black tea residue, you get exactly this result. the whole radium geiger discussion has a place with collectors, but you still get access to radium based medical stuff to mimic the geiger readings. Russia and China still have radium base paste. if you really want to fool anybody, that is the way to go. expensive rolex watch collectors know that. Geiger readings are just one facett in evaluating vintage watches. you have to handle a lot of watches to become more certain, what you are looking at. in this case the different colour movement plates would kill it for me. the chances of tampering are too high. i had many PAF railmasters and we contributed to the evaluations of the factory research regarding the PAF watches with John Diethelm in the 90`s. still, i`d not trade with this Speedmaster , as requested with the OP. only with the much rarer FAP Flightmaster. not the more common PAF examples. kind regards. achim