Did a 135.004 Railmaster come with a T Swiss Made T dial?

Posts
311
Likes
575
A couple of months ago, Hodinkee sold this gorgeous-looking PAF Seamaster (Railmaster), that I wasn't able to buy. I wouldn't have paid the asking price anyway so in a way I was glad it got sold before I became aware of it.



Afterward, I got talking with Rich, who curates and sources many of their vintage pieces on offer (including this one) and he was convinced and pretty sure it was an honest, all-original example, except obviously the second-hand.

However, I just realised, while relooking at the dial today (to compare with a potential incoming - more hopefully on that in a separate thread soon), that it has "T Swiss Made T" printed at the bottom, and as far as I am aware and have seen, almost all 135.004 Railmasters (including the PAF Seamaster variances) always have "Swiss Made" printed at the bottom of the dial.



T Swiss Made T would also be incorrect because the PAF variants (in the 60's) were always Radium and never Tritium.

While the dial and hands seem to match visually (I have no UV shots and it's obviously not possible to verify anymore), what's the consensus here about this dial? Is it original to the watch? I know just because pictures tell us one thing, doesn't mean another can't hold true (especially in the vintage watch collecting world) but I have trouble believing this to be the case here given that this second batch of PAF Railmasters (after the 2914's) was produced in a very tight run of (allegedly) approximately less than 1000.

Full listing here for those interested:
 
Posts
11,993
Likes
20,838
I’m no Railmaster expert but I thought a ‘T Swiss Made T’ dial was a legit variant.
This makes sense given the -63 sub reference as Radium was phased out in ‘62.
 
Posts
6,534
Likes
26,493
Despite the markings, Hodinkee have listed it as radium? Can you ask Rich if they have readings of the dial?

 
Posts
3,413
Likes
7,319
I have seen a civilian 135-004-railmaster with a dial carrying only one "T", so I think its legitimate for the ref. 135.004-63
However I don´t know about the lume on the PAF variants
 
Posts
11,993
Likes
20,838
It’s be interesting if any 135.004 owners with geigers can post their results. I wonder if some -63’s are tritium dials without T’s.
 
Posts
311
Likes
575
I’m no Railmaster expert but I thought a ‘T Swiss Made T’ dial was a legit variant.
This makes sense given the -63 sub reference as Radium was phased out in ‘62.

T Swiss Made T is not a legit (or rather known) variant of the PAF Speedmaster, reference 135.004.

I've never seen one (and I am not claiming personal or individual authority over this reference but I have obsessively looked for them for years). They may be legit for a civilian 135.004 but from what I have been able to discern, for the military version, radium (not tritium) dials were used despite being made in 63 (which is after when Omega conventionally stopped using Radium dials). The reason for this as well is that Omega used "older" dials, that was "available" to put together the request for these watches by the PAF.

Again, all part of speculative history about this model.
 
Posts
311
Likes
575
I have seen a civilian 135-004-railmaster with a dial carrying only one "T", so I think its legitimate for the ref. 135.004-63
However I don´t know about the lume on the PAF variants

I've seen a civilian (not military) Swiss Made T, but never a T Swiss Made T.

I'd love for the experts (in this reference, and not just PAF variants) to chime in.
 
Posts
9,934
Likes
15,605
I've seen radium specifically mentioned on an extract for a mil Railmaster which was rather later than any other radium lume Omega so while I have no PAF knowledge, I too would have expected radium lume on such a dial
 
Posts
5,410
Likes
9,246
T Swiss Made T is not a legit (or rather known) variant of the PAF Speedmaster, reference 135.004.

I've never seen one (and I am not claiming personal or individual authority over this reference but I have obsessively looked for them for years). They may be legit for a civilian 135.004 but from what I have been able to discern, for the military version, radium (not tritium) dials were used despite being made in 63 (which is after when Omega conventionally stopped using Radium dials). The reason for this as well is that Omega used "older" dials, that was "available" to put together the request for these watches by the PAF.

Again, all part of speculative history about this model.

Not speculative. It is correct. I researched this reference with John Diethelm from the factory in the late 1990's.
 
Posts
311
Likes
575
Interesting thanks. Is this a verified PAF variant?
 
Posts
311
Likes
575
Same 1963 reference, Tritium dial:


Found the original listing at Mathew Bain here.

Some observations:

- Listing makes no mention of this being a PAF reference.
- No caseback picture showing PAF engraving
- No mention of Omega extract confirming delivery of this watch to PAF.
- Serial no 197xxx is incorrect for a 135.004 reference and dates the movement to 1960 (probably a 2914 movement but even those had PAF engravings if it was a sub series 5 reference).

My conclusion is that this is a franken watch at best.
 
Posts
311
Likes
575
Having said that, here is a more credible PAF "T Swiss Made T" 135.004 Tritium dial:

Link: https://www.brevetwatches.de/en/wat...ref-135004-63-aus-dem-jahr-1963-paf-military/

My observations:

- The movement is in the right range (21087xxx) firmly placing it in "Batch 2" of the 135.004's that were issued to PAF around Dec 1964
- No case back pic or extract but mentions it was delivered to PAF so assume it's there but wasn't shown.

To me, the civilian 135.004's came with Tritium dials and it seems the military versions came with both (there are numerous examples of 135.004's with just "Swiss Made" but featuring Tritium dials and to me, these are also correct).

 
Posts
586
Likes
765
My Railmaster PAF, 135004-63, dated Apr. 64 from extract, has a SWISS MADE only dial.

And extract mentions " delivered to Pakistan Air Force. The watch bears the movement number 20.4XXXXX and a special military "P.A.F" engraving on the outside case back.

 
Posts
6,794
Likes
21,980
Found the original listing at Mathew Bain here.

Some observations:

- Listing makes no mention of this being a PAF reference.
- No caseback picture showing PAF engraving
- No mention of Omega extract confirming delivery of this watch to PAF.
- Serial no 197xxx is incorrect for a 135.004 reference and dates the movement to 1960 (probably a 2914 movement but even those had PAF engravings if it was a sub series 5 reference).

My conclusion is that this is a franken watch at best.

No, most place the movement at 1962, latter part.
 
Posts
9,934
Likes
15,605
No, most place the movement at 1962, latter part.
19.7m is more like 1962, his date assessment was out.
Edited: