Can anybody find the specific terms quoted by @Inox above among the general conditions defined on their website as of 19/03/15?
https://www.bukowskis.com/en/help/buyer_terms/hammer?from_language=sv
I wonder if the sellers were aware of the new rules.
Not in general conditions, but on the auction site - https://www.bukowskis.com/en/auctions/614/home, not present on previous timepieces auctions.
I dragged myself out of bed to follow along, with four lots that I'd earmarked as "passive pursuits," in that I would bid until about 10% off market value and then would stop.
I lost on the first three (Movado - lot 50, 105.012-66HF - lot 76, and 1016 Explorer - lot 80). All of those were in great condition and sold for reasonable prices, so I'm starting to think I quit for no reason. Glad I caught the fourth one though (I'll let that remain a mystery 馃槈).
While not an Omega, I'm kicking myself for not bidding on the salmon UG Compur that went for around ~$2k all in. Seemed nice, though it hadn't really caught my attention prior to the sale so I'm not sure if I missed something about the condition that made it go that low (or if it was just the sales issues that were previously stated).
https://www.bukowskis.com/en/auctions/614/66-universal-geneve-compur-chronograph
Dial appears to be refinished IMO.
looks quite nice to me, aside from the Omega crown. Very good price....
I was wondering about the watch and dial originality so I opened up a new thread on the UG subforum so as to not drift this thread more than it's already been. Thanks gents.
Andrew
OCD tendency
Just for me as a noob: Is it "noob's" or "noobs"? 馃槣
Vanished with $97k , minus fees.
He could've vanished with more if he had slowed down a bit and listened to the advice of experts.
How many times do I have to correct noob's that it's CDO (chronic disorder with obsession) in correct alphabetical order.
Seriously, OP stepped on his Richard, maybe no fault of his own.
My legal team, Dewey, Cheatham and Howe told me not to relinquish possession at this time.
