Possible new 300m spotted on Daniel Craig

Posts
130
Likes
234
A new no date SMP just got released


I don't mind the day one mind, but I have to recognize that this picture shoes how the absence of the date makes the watch more attractive.
 
Posts
98
Likes
83
I can’t see there being a thinner case unless they use a solid back. I’ve seen nothing to suggest the 8806 is any thinner than the 8800. The date wheel is recessed, not stuck on top. Maybe it is thinner but I don’t think so.

Omega has 8800 watches with a thickness of under 10mm.
 
Posts
11
Likes
12
I can’t see there being a thinner case unless they use a solid back. I’ve seen nothing to suggest the 8806 is any thinner than the 8800. The date wheel is recessed, not stuck on top. Maybe it is thinner but I don’t think so.
the NTTD is listed as 13.0mm thick.
the normal production 300m is 13.6mm.
based on the pics, it looks like the case and domed crystal of the NTTD (but steel), with the smaller wave dial of the 60th (but black).
 
Posts
9,534
Likes
15,040
Omega has 8800 watches with a thickness of under 10mm.
Feel free to demonstrate
 
Posts
98
Likes
83
Would like to see a Seamaster 300m around 12mm. If that's impossible I would be happy with a 200m. Just make it 12mm so it sits flatter on the wrist. The Aqua Terra Luxury/Fashion model (the new black 41 / the new moonshine golds) don't need to be 13,4mm either if it was up to me.
The 38mm aqua terra comes close to 12.

But yeah that's Omega.
 
Posts
2,519
Likes
4,727
Would like to see a Seamaster 300m around 12mm. If that's impossible I would be happy with a 200m. Just make it 12mm so it sits flatter on the wrist. The Aqua Terra Luxury/Fashion model (the new black 41 / the new moonshine golds) don't need to be 13,4mm either if it was up to me.
The 38mm aqua terra comes close to 12.

But yeah that's Omega.

12mm is thinner than a Submariner, and a Submariner has already slightly turned the corner from thinning case & case back as much as possible to also sacrificing bezel and crystal height. Flat crystals are boring, and obnoxious, and while I'm not a fan of the SMP chonnnnnk bezel and lack of any sort of traditional coin or gear style edge, I also don't think that the bezel has to be thinned out as much as a sub's bezel.

Fine, the AT should be closer to 12, 12.5mm thick, especially because of the lack of dive bezel. But neither anorexic dive watches nor anorexic people are attractive.

EDIT: This probably comes across slightly more harsh than is necessary and I also realize that the highly-respected and attractive 2254 comes in at about 12mm thick, so it's not like it's impossible for Omega to pull this off. However, I still don't believe that "thinness at any cost" is the way to go, as it does impact design. I don't suppose anyone will ever agree totally on this topic.
Edited:
 
Posts
9,534
Likes
15,040
Would like to see a Seamaster 300m around 12mm. If that's impossible I would be happy with a 200m. Just make it 12mm so it sits flatter on the wrist. The Aqua Terra Luxury/Fashion model (the new black 41 / the new moonshine golds) don't need to be 13,4mm either if it was up to me.
The 38mm aqua terra comes close to 12.

But yeah that's Omega.

Every single 3 hand SMP model up until 2006 was thinner than 12mm with 300m rating AFAIR. Its certainly not impossible.
 
Posts
2,519
Likes
4,727
Ceramic dial adds thickness, and the handstack for the 300m is quite tall (lot of vertical space between hands).

How much thicker is a ceramic dial compared to a brass or aluminum one?
 
Posts
69
Likes
66
How much thicker is a ceramic dial compared to a brass or aluminum one?
Didn’t the previous generation have a ceramic dial? I’m not asking for incredibly thin. The current generation updates (skip to the exhibition case back if necessary) placed in the case of the previous generation. Perfect for me.
 
Posts
1,499
Likes
2,565
How much thicker is a ceramic dial compared to a brass or aluminum one?
My understanding is that brass/aluminum dials are typically around half a millimeter thick. The ceramic dials, comprised of a ceramic layer with a brass backing, can be 1-1.5mm thick because of the additional layering and the fact that the ceramic layer must be thick enough to not shatter.
 
Posts
1,096
Likes
2,063
@Archer Any experience with the dials of the moderm Seamasters, say the Peter Blakes to recent?
 
Posts
2,519
Likes
4,727
My understanding is that brass/aluminum dials are typically around half a millimeter thick. The ceramic dials, comprised of a ceramic layer with a brass backing, can be 1-1.5mm thick because of the additional layering and the fact that the ceramic layer must be thick enough to not shatter.

That's fairly significant.
 
Posts
297
Likes
253
My understanding is that brass/aluminum dials are typically around half a millimeter thick. The ceramic dials, comprised of a ceramic layer with a brass backing, can be 1-1.5mm thick because of the additional layering and the fact that the ceramic layer must be thick enough to not shatter.

Curious how NTTD and the Bond 60th moved to aluminum dials and bezels that give them a matte finish. The real winner is the bezels but I’m also curious if the lume on the exterior of the watch has extra thickness because how they did it, is marvelous I think
 
Posts
158
Likes
105
Curious how NTTD and the Bond 60th moved to aluminum dials and bezels that give them a matte finish. The real winner is the bezels but I’m also curious if the lume on the exterior of the watch has extra thickness because how they did it, is marvelous I think
FWIW the new PO boutique models have a brushed ceramic bezel with the same matte finish