Opinion on Seamaster Caliber 564 For Sale

Posts
3,133
Likes
5,560
"Overpolished" is putting it mildly. Search for the seller name on this forum and see what comes up.
 
Posts
8,711
Likes
14,611
A member for 4.5 years with nearly 1500 posts and you have to ask if that is over polished? What have you been doing with your time here? 😉
 
Posts
1,117
Likes
1,783
Should the caseback not be 168.024 on these chronometer models?
I know the 166.010 caseback is interchangeable but would have expect to see dual reference at least.
 
Posts
3,247
Likes
6,329
A member for 4.5 years with nearly 1500 posts and you have to ask if that is over polished? What have you been doing with your time here? 😉

That’s what I thought but wanted to see what others think 😉

Didn’t knew about that seller profile, now I do! 👍
Edited:
 
Posts
3,690
Likes
6,264
Do you know the saying “buy the seller”? That does not apply to this seller.
 
Posts
337
Likes
397
ah, this background, that's definitely from someone who will sell a refinished/over-polished vintage watch. There are a bunch of sellers using the same background, the one which I remembered the name was "montre48"
 
Posts
3,247
Likes
6,329
ah, this background, that's definitely from someone who will sell a refinished/over-polished vintage watch. There are a bunch of sellers using the same background, the one which I remembered the name was "montre48"

Yes seller is Montre48 from Canada, on my blacklist now 👍
Edited:
 
Posts
1,921
Likes
2,658
I'm not very familiar with this reference but the crown looks wrong on it IMO...
 
Posts
8,711
Likes
14,611
I'm not very familiar with this reference but the crown looks wrong on it IMO...
That really is the least of its issues.
 
Posts
4,963
Likes
18,397
Should the caseback not be 168.024 on these chronometer models?
I know the 166.010 caseback is interchangeable but would have expect to see dual reference at least.
Sometimes you see them only with the 166010