Annapolis
·OFers,
For a c.2013 co-axial watch (not a Master Chronometer, fwiw), how out-of-COSC would it have to be for Omega to service it as warranty work rather than at the owner's expense?
Before anyone jumps to the "it's older than 5 years so is out of warranty" routine, let me add: the watch sat in the OB for most of its (estimated) 10-year life, so the warranty was only activated last year. Plenty of time remaining.
Right now I'd say it's losing about 7 seconds a day, and that's on the wrist, real-world timekeeping. No positional regulation that I've tried (and I've tried 'em all) makes any discernible difference.
Such a ludicrous, first-world issue, I know: 86,400 seconds a day, it's off by .008% and I'm wondering about getting it looked at. But it is out of spec in every position, and I'm thinking it's probably about due for a service anyway. Is this a compelling case for warranty work, or will they likely say it's just routine service, fork over the $?
For a c.2013 co-axial watch (not a Master Chronometer, fwiw), how out-of-COSC would it have to be for Omega to service it as warranty work rather than at the owner's expense?
Before anyone jumps to the "it's older than 5 years so is out of warranty" routine, let me add: the watch sat in the OB for most of its (estimated) 10-year life, so the warranty was only activated last year. Plenty of time remaining.
Right now I'd say it's losing about 7 seconds a day, and that's on the wrist, real-world timekeeping. No positional regulation that I've tried (and I've tried 'em all) makes any discernible difference.
Such a ludicrous, first-world issue, I know: 86,400 seconds a day, it's off by .008% and I'm wondering about getting it looked at. But it is out of spec in every position, and I'm thinking it's probably about due for a service anyway. Is this a compelling case for warranty work, or will they likely say it's just routine service, fork over the $?