*****Omega vs Seiko vs Oris*****

Posts
1,802
Likes
10,156
I'm quite the Speedmaster fanboy these days, but I started with a similar zeal for Seamasters. A speedy would be my #1 choice. However, that Seiko is a gorgeous watch and is my favorite Seiko made. Clean and classy look, very functional, and of course it has the date window I do so adore. I prefer that Prospex over the Seamasters pictured. But I'd still go for the Speedmaster 50th Anniversary, even without the date window that's so important to me.
 
Posts
24,250
Likes
53,999
A purchase like this is not an investment, it's just like buying some nice clothing. So try them on and decide which one you like the best.
 
Posts
2,675
Likes
7,487
Hi guys, in about a month or so I will finally have enough saving to buy my first ~$5000 watch!!
I have came down to the following 5 models.
Could you guys please help me in choosing one? It will be the one and only watch that I will be wearing until I hit 40. Possibly even 50 or 60.
I'm 28 now.
1 - Seiko rocks, but why go for the LE $5000 version? What they're awesome at is giving extreme value propositions for under $500. Why not go for a Seiko 5 and SKX model as daily beaters / divers for swimming. 2 watches to rotate and for only 10% of your budget. Leaves you with $4500 for additional options...
2 - If you like the Speedy Pro or SM300, get a used one for around $3000. Combined with the 2 Seikos you'd still have $1500 left over...
3 - Wear the other 3, continue searching and use the $1500 to pick up another one later... If you're like most of us, you'll decide the ultimate number of watches to own is N+1...
 
Posts
30
Likes
21
I love the design of the speedmaster, but I'm not a big fan of manual winding.. Therefore, I'm leaning towards the Seiko and Seamaster 300.

Do you guys have any other watches that you would like to suggest other than the five that I listed for my budget?

I had Seiko srx003 and tissot heritage visodate gold but got rid of them both and ended up getting the 10 dollar casio watch that obama wore lol.

This is going to be a life time thing for me, getting a watch near 5k. 馃榾
 
Posts
18,202
Likes
27,530
I love the design of the speedmaster, but I'm not a big fan of manual winding.. Therefore, I'm leaning towards the Seiko and Seamaster 300.

Do you guys have any other watches that you would like to suggest other than the five that I listed for my budget?

I had Seiko srx003 and tissot heritage visodate gold but got rid of them both and ended up getting the 10 dollar casio watch that obama wore lol.

This is going to be a life time thing for me, getting a watch near 5k. 馃榾

Honestly manual winding is not a big deal at all. Takes about 30 seconds if you have to set it. Personally since I rarely wear the same watch 2 days in a row I have to wind every watch I wear, and I鈥檓 going to sell my winders.
 
Posts
2,771
Likes
4,378
I have a speedmaster and the SM 300. The seamaster is quite thick and does not fit under all of my shirt cuffs. I wore the speedmaster everyday for over a year because it was the only watch I had while away from home. I never got tired of it. I was not a huge fan of the speedmaster until I got one. If I had to choose probably the speedmaster but the 60th aniversiy seamaster would be a strong contender too.
 
Posts
1,813
Likes
9,397
@christopher90,
It is highly unlikely that you will make it to 60 with just one watch, especially if you start with any of the watches you mentioned, even more so if you look at the What are You Wearing Today thread here on OF.

Take a look at some vintage Speedmasters between 1960s and 1990s and you will probably lose interest in the modern ones. A good vintage one would give you a long term goal, but it鈥檚 probably too soon and too expensive for you to go down that rabbit hole yet.

I don鈥檛 own a Seiko but get the feeling that you could get a similar look for way less.

I have passed on the Seamaster and Speedy Trilogy several times now (was offered the Speedy again a couple of days ago by my local OB)....because I think the Railmaster is the best of the three, all the essence without the superfluous froth, which is why I own that one.

There is however a watch, that isn鈥檛 on your list, that might go a long way to meeting your watch for all purposes objective. I鈥榤 assuming that your name is Christopher, is that correct? Well maybe you should try (everyone is going to hate me here), a Christopher Ward C65 Trident GMT. It looks like this:-



and here is mine


The quality is on a par with Omega (I have 7 others to compare it with), it has the best micro-adjustment clasp of any of the watches that I own or have tried and it costs a fraction of your budget. Why pay a huge premium just to keep all those useless influencer Brand Ambassadors in the lap of luxury?

I have really enjoyed all of my Omegas over the years, but after my C65 GMT arrived they were all (bar my Speedmaster) packed up and dumped in the bank. Heck I鈥榲e started contemplating selling the whole lot.

Open your eyes wide and try to avoid falling for the luxury marketing bullshit. Or be prepared to accept a 30% loss of value with 12 months of purchase.

Oh, and like most other posters have said, buy it because you like it, nothing more.

Good hunting!

Longbow
 
Posts
18,202
Likes
27,530
@christopher90,
It is highly unlikely that you will make it to 60 with just one watch, especially if you start with any of the watches you mentioned, even more so if you look at the What are You Wearing Today thread here on OF.

Take a look at some vintage Speedmasters between 1960s and 1990s and you will probably lose interest in the modern ones. A good vintage one would give you a long term goal, but it鈥檚 probably too soon and too expensive for you to go down that rabbit hole yet.

I don鈥檛 own a Seiko but get the feeling that you could get a similar look for way less.

I have passed on the Seamaster and Speedy Trilogy several times now (was offered the Speedy again a couple of days ago by my local OB)....because I think the Railmaster is the best of the three, all the essence without the superfluous froth, which is why I own that one.

There is however a watch, that isn鈥檛 on your list, that might go a long way to meeting your watch for all purposes objective. I鈥榤 assuming that your name is Christopher, is that correct? Well maybe you should try (everyone is going to hate me here), a Christopher Ward C65 Trident GMT. It looks like this:-



and here is mine


The quality is on a par with Omega (I have 7 others to compare it with), it has the best micro-adjustment clasp of any of the watches that I own or have tried and it costs a fraction of your budget. Why pay a huge premium just to keep all those useless influencer Brand Ambassadors in the lap of luxury?

I have really enjoyed all of my Omegas over the years, but after my C65 GMT arrived they were all (bar my Speedmaster) packed up and dumped in the bank. Heck I鈥榲e started contemplating selling the whole lot.

Open your eyes wide and try to avoid falling for the luxury marketing bullshit. Or be prepared to accept a 30% loss of value with 12 months of purchase.

Oh, and like most other posters have said, buy it because you like it, nothing more.

Good hunting!

Longbow

Stop taunting me with that piece!!!!
 
Posts
288
Likes
210
Not to be contrarian or a party pooper, but what's wrong with buying a $200 SKX007/009/011 or a nice $120 Alpha Daytona with the Seagull ST19 handwound column wheel movement, and put $4800 into your retirement fund? These watches don't run away. I'm pretty sure Omega will sell you a brand new Speedmaster in 2038...

Of course, if you have already maxed out your contribution for the year, then by all means, spend away! I personally would (and did) get something Speedmaster-y with a coaxial movement, for the technical appeal.
Edited:
 
Posts
261
Likes
767
Just adding my 2 cents for for its worth!!

I was in your position a few (many now) years ago at a similar age thinking I would only need one watch, oh how I was wrong!

Picked up my Aqua Terra brand new with a little discount from an AD. 6 months later I鈥檓 dabbling in the pre-owned market and pick up my SMP300 at what seems now a bargain price which is my daily wear.

It might be worth looking at something under your budget leaving some money for your second watch.

Having said that have you considered an Aqua Terra, well within your budget, get it on a bracelet get a strap for it as well, dress it up or down.
 
Posts
2,675
Likes
7,487
I would have seriously considered about that watch if it was 3k cad.
Unrealistically low price expectation - clever opening bid... 馃槈
 
Posts
746
Likes
865
I can't help you choose one, but I can tell which one I like the most. It's the 1957 trilogy seamaster. My vote is biased because I have that one and love it.
 
Posts
2,675
Likes
7,487
Posts
15,478
Likes
45,846
You need more exposure to watches. Out of the many thousands of watches you have to choose from, exposure over time will help you to narrow the number of possibles to a short list. Something like choosing the spouse you could live with for decades. Nobody could help you make that choice, either.
 
Posts
2,006
Likes
7,160
1 - Seiko rocks, but why go for the LE $5000 version? What they're awesome at is giving extreme value propositions for under $500. Why not go for a Seiko 5 and SKX model as daily beaters / divers for swimming. 2 watches to rotate and for only 10% of your budget. Leaves you with $4500 for additional options...
2 - If you like the Speedy Pro or SM300, get a used one for around $3000. Combined with the 2 Seikos you'd still have $1500 left over...
3 - Wear the other 3, continue searching and use the $1500 to pick up another one later... If you're like most of us, you'll decide the ultimate number of watches to own is N+1...
I agree with @gostang9 . When the SLA017 came out a lot of people argued that US$5K was too expensive for a watch with a Cal. 6R15. I would go cheaper but get a better movement. An MM300 with a Cal. 8L35. They are discontinued but can be picked up for US$2K. Leaves US$3K for a dress watch.
But out of the 5 that you chose I would go for the stock Seamaster.
 
Posts
2,675
Likes
7,487
You need more exposure to watches. Out of the many thousands of watches you have to choose from, exposure over time will help you to narrow the number of possibles to a short list. Something like choosing the spouse you could live with for decades. Nobody could help you make that choice, either.
Edit: this comment was intended to be witty , humorous and entirely sarcastic... but it failed...

...Stuff and nonsense!! Continued exposure simply expands the list of desired watches, let鈥檚 not fool the young man... the sooner he realizes the rabbit hole exists the sooner he can begin denying he鈥檚 fallin deeper into it! 馃槈
Edited: