gbesq
·Not looking to start an Omega vs. Rolex flame war. That's been done numerous times on this and many other watch forums. We all know that at one time before the quartz crisis, Omega enjoyed a reputation as the undisputed leader of mass produced high end Swiss watches and that Rolex played second fiddle. You'll note that I intentionally use the term "mass produced" and do not use the term "luxury watch" as I believe that Omega and Rolex are the former and not the latter, then or now. We also know that the modern day Rolex marketing machine -- artificial scarcity and all -- is second to none. The question is this: given Omega's resurgence, innovation and the quality of the product that they're delivering these days, is it possible that Omega will overtake Rolex in terms of its reputation among the general consumer? I would argue that among "watch nerds" and horologists that Omega is already there and continues to innovate at a clip that exceeds Rolex's play it safe glacial pace. That being said, is technical prowess, attractive styling and superior value enough for Omega to recapture the hearts and minds of the general watch buying public or is Rolex always going to be the watch to buy for those with money, most of whom don't know much about watches?