gostang9
·Now we know at least who is partly responsible for THIS. Yes you’re really DIFFERENT than us too.

As for being different, that I will own proudly! 😎
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Now we know at least who is partly responsible for THIS. Yes you’re really DIFFERENT than us too.

I have a hard time connecting the fact that the PN hit records today with the fact that they were not liked originally. I do not see any other reason than fashion, trend and communication to explain why a valjoux 22 or whatever gets sold for 200K these days. So, if in 50 years or so, people decide that they the-only-vintage-watch-to-buy is a speedmaster that does not look like a speedmaster but which is similar to an old one, with funky colours, and a coloured subdial at 9 o'clock that is useless, then this is probably the watch to buy today? In the meantime, I'll buy other watches.
The original 'Paul Newman' Daytona is rare today because it was not liked originally, sat on store shelves unsold... today they hit records at auction.
I'm perfectly fine being 'different' in actually liking this watch while most people hate it.
I have always been drawn to the colours of the MK40 (sounds like most of the OF community doesn't... fine by me)
I prefer the 3 subdials at 3, 6 and 9 positions (so this version is better for me than the MK40)
I like simpler dials (so this version again better, others seem to prefer the complications of the MK40... yet few want to own one... 🤔 )
I very much like the bubbly alpha numerals (see my current avatar from my Bulova diver).
If I had designed this watch, I would have minimized or eliminated the seconds marking around the perimeter of the dial and moved the numerals outward and then I would have made them a beautiful fauxtina as we see on lovely vintage watches. (that's just me, and I know I'm pretty much on my own for liking this thing in the first place... my teachers always told me I was a bit 'different'..)![]()
This watch seems to make no sense horologically. Which end of the two-headed seconds hand are you suppose to use? I suppose you pick blue on left or right and then remember to use that the next time you check the accuracy of your watch.
This is an interesting point, does anyone have a reasonable explanation why a 2 sided pointed would be used for the seconds sub-dial?
When the long end is facing straight up, the 'right' side colored blue would match with the right half of the blue colored sub-dial, so I assume that means the long end is the point that should be referenced?
I cannot figure out why the short end is there...
As I stated the design of the 9 o'clock subdial does not make any sense. But who cares? The more stupid, the more unwanted, the more desirable in 50 years.🤪
This is an interesting point, does anyone have a reasonable explanation why a 2 sided pointed would be used for the seconds sub-dial?
When the long end is facing straight up, the 'right' side colored blue would match with the right half of the blue colored sub-dial, so I assume that means the long end is the point that should be referenced?
I cannot figure out why the short end is there...
Now we know at least who is partly responsible for THIS. Yes you’re really DIFFERENT than us too.
This is an interesting point, does anyone have a reasonable explanation why a 2 sided pointed would be used for the seconds sub-dial?
I cannot figure out why the short end is there...
That makes sense, as the yellow tip of the chrono hand also resembles an aeroplane as well... 👍