I won't be wearing the watch. That said, if you simply think that it's a tribute to someone, their grandfather and a website and can't see that it's obviously also a tribute to an Omega MK 40 Speedmaster as it's been clearly stated I'll agree to disagree. If you can't see that the Speedy Tuesday releases are just like this H10 release in that they're a tribute to a hashtag that someone personally created to celebrate the anniversary of that hashtag (when the entire genesis of the watch was to celebrate the anniversary of the hashtag which to quote you "is the very definition of paying tribute to yourself just like it is with any product commemorating something"), fair enough. At the end of the day one is a direct tribute to a website that someone created, that same person being part of the creation of said tribute, while the other is a direct tribute to a hashtag that someone created, that same person being part of the creation of said tribute. I would say calling out on out for that while giving pass to the other is again laughably hypocritical and it seems very clear to me that the reason for that is that you don't like one of the watches but rather like the other which for some odd reason keeps you from being balanced in your assessment of them as tribute pieces. At least that's my conservative take on it, though I suspect there's more to it.