Omega Seamaster

M

Posts

8

Likes

4

Mike 1

·Sep 9, 2026

Hi guys my name I Mike and I just joined the forum the other day but I got of on the wrong foot. I have a omega seamaster that I bought from a coworker in 1984 and put it in a drawer and now it’s been brought back out and now am going through the process to authenticate I don’t know how to attack picture. Any info can help

 

Posts

13,555

Likes

23,503

Davidt

·Sep 9, 2026

Looks correct.

Need better, in focus pictures for further condition assessment

 

M

Posts

8

Likes

4

Mike 1

·Sep 9, 2026

I will work on the pictures I have no macro any advise

 

Posts

13,555

Likes

23,503

Davidt

·Sep 9, 2026

Indirect Natural light by a window

 

M

Posts

8

Likes

4

Mike 1

·Sep 27, 2026

Hi, my name is Mike 1 and would like to get opinion of a picture I want to share

 

Posts

41

Likes

213

SpaceCowboy

·Sep 27, 2026

A 64 caseback, period correct bezel, need serial number to confirm the movement. Again, you need to drastically improve your skills with the camera. 550 caliber though, should be 552? Movement could be from 14755.

 

Posts

592

Likes

2,784

kox

·Sep 28, 2026

SpaceCowboy

A 64 caseback, period correct bezel, need serial number to confirm the movement. Again, you need to drastically improve your skills with the camera. 550 caliber though, should be 552? Movement could be from 14755.

Yes, parts looks correct for a 165.024-64. There was a small batch of cal. 550 versions for this subreference. First of the cal 550 'mark II' movements. Serial is most likely in the 23.473.xxx range. Q3 1966 production.

 

M

Posts

8

Likes

4

Mike 1

·Fri. 5:16pm

kox

Yes, parts looks correct for a 165.024-64. There was a small batch of cal. 550 versions for this subreference. First of the cal 550 'mark II' movements. Serial is most likely in the 23.473.xxx range. Q3 1966 production.

I will take better pics it’s a 550 17 jewel OXG