Omega Seamaster 300 165.024 Big Triangle

Fost

S Sarandy

I will repeat myself one more time...Since you seem a bit stubborn, let's say even a bit limited.....You do not learn me anything by what you write, as anything I read form the posts up here...

If I had a 1965 movement with a service case and a bezel from 1964, I would ask myself if this watch is a bit..franken, at least.

But this is not..and the archive extract, which means so nothing to you as we may ask ourselves why they sell it so dearly, is here to confirm that this watch seems quite orignal.

And if this dial was so fake, why does it not have the swiss made marking, given that it is so easy to print and that the rest of he dial is so neat.

What I see is a bunch of guys telling me that tells me that this dial is unlike all the dials we can see.

But :

Have you any documentation from Omega?
Have you extracted all the dials form the watch to see that there is the swiss made marking?
Have you other arguments than the photos we can see on the internet???

Can you tell me for example, where the dials were made? which firm made them? What is their marking behind?

Please, give me something I do not already know..

Again, I will repeat myself without insults unlike you, I did not learn anything here. But maybe is it because you know nothing more that what we can read on the internet.

Maybe you are the fakes.

Cheers,

Ps : As for the Heuer, this a 5 something reference number and a swiss only black dial...It was bought from a very reputable collector. But, you will not see an inch of it, since I see this forum is all about taking down what they see..and it is by no means interesting to exchange down here.

Dan S

How do we know that the one on the right isn't the fake? 👎 😁

Fost

S Sarandy

So this one is fake?

Because one can see so many example dials that do not match your standard..but as you would say, they are all fakes...😉

But let's kill this, as this forum does not set the standard of what's fake or not. This forum does not set the standard..

And be sure, I am not bitter, because whatever you might say and whatever your insults when one's disagree with you, I prefer to wear my watch rather than any of the ones you showed me as the true standards.

And yes, believe it or not, I have the archive extract...

But again, I haven't learn anything, you weren't even able to tell me which firm made those dials and what one ca see at the back of those dials.

Which should be quite basic info for "specialists" like you...

So make me at least learn something...

S Sarandy

So this one is fake?

Because one can see so many example dials that do not match your standard..but as you would say, they are all fakes...😉

But let's kill this, as this forum does not set the standard of what's fake or not. This forum does not set the standard..

And be sure, I am not bitter, because whatever you might say and whatever your insults when one's disagree with you, I prefer to wear my watch rather than any of the ones you showed me as the true standards.

And yes, believe it or not, I have the archive extract...

But again, I haven't learn anything, you weren't even able to tell me which firm made those dials and what one ca see at the back of those dials.

Which should be quite basic info for "specialists" like you...

So make me at least learn something...

Fost

I think you need help for mental assistance ...
Take care.

southtexas

I’ll play along!

1) Is anyone arguing that your dial PLATE is not an original Omega dial plate?

2) Do you understand the difference between a “refinished dial” and a “fake dial”?

3) Can you provide 1 single example of a legitimate 300 dial not signed Swiss at the bottom?

These are straightforward, direct questions which should be easy to answer. I thank you in advance for your time.