- Posts
- 315
- Likes
- 1,567
aesguerra
·Silly question. I have the small seconds hand version. When I wind it by hand after not wearing it for a while it is initially very easy to wind but then becomes very difficult. Is this normal?
thanks in advance.
Omega Seamaster 1948..any in the wild yet?
- Posts
- 7
- Likes
- 3
- Posts
- 99
- Likes
- 147
Ottsby
·It is a bit thick but I think it wears very well
- Posts
- 622
- Likes
- 2,836
Bp1000
·Omega boutique Birmingham have had a delivery today of both
centre and small seconds of the 1948 if anyone is still after one
it’s a really stunning watch, overlooked I think but has a lot of charm and character
centre and small seconds of the 1948 if anyone is still after one
it’s a really stunning watch, overlooked I think but has a lot of charm and character
- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 70
- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 125
Sethmns
·
- Posts
- 11,718
- Likes
- 37,845
abrod520
·5th Ave has at least one each of the center and small seconds if anyone's looking for these.
- Posts
- 34
- Likes
- 13
Manners
·I’m over the moon with mine. Just a lovely timepiece. I think too may speculators got in on the waiting lists
Hoping to spin them.
Hoping to spin them.
- Posts
- 1,434
- Likes
- 2,203
scapa
·I've just found a central-seconds version -- I gather they're not quite as popular as the small-seconds but it sure is a beautiful piece. Tempted...
- Posts
- 34
- Likes
- 13
Manners
·I love the watch for what it is (both versions). However I think Oemag are running out too many limited editions. I think it may be more than 25 years before the beauty/rarity of this/these watches is fully valued.
In the meantime just enjoy it on your wrist- sole purpose!
In the meantime just enjoy it on your wrist- sole purpose!
- Posts
- 1,093
- Likes
- 18,796
Mach
·Wearing mine today:
It’s quite difficult to capture the Omega symbol on the crystal!
It’s quite difficult to capture the Omega symbol on the crystal!
- Posts
- 622
- Likes
- 2,836
- Posts
- 395
- Likes
- 401
thelinendial
·J Jim2854United States
I know of an AD that had one and he seems willing to give a discount from Canada so you get also an exchange rate discount. Message me if interested in the contact info.
- Posts
- 9,047
- Likes
- 46,869
gbesq
·I’ll stick with my 1956 model. No numeric indices, but it was quite a bit less expensive than the new version. 😀
Edited:
- Posts
- 247
- Likes
- 179
justacpa
·Please excuse my Omega historical ignorance, but is 1948 the year this model was first introduced? If so, that's my birth year and would serve quite well as an excuse for more shopping.
- Posts
- 9,047
- Likes
- 46,869
- Posts
- 10
- Likes
- 59
serhij
·
- Posts
- 274
- Likes
- 1,407
Mtnmansa
·
- Posts
- 9,047
- Likes
- 46,869
gbesq
·And here’s the vintage equivalent of the subsecond version from 1950. Not a co-axial, but it still keeps time within a few seconds per day. 😀
- Posts
- 1,616
- Likes
- 5,078
flw
··history nerdWell, now I feel the need to add mine. One of my favorites.
