Omega Seamaster 166.003 - any red flags?

Posts
880
Likes
1,681
Hello everyone,

Here is what I see:
- Original dial with a patina that I don't find unaesthetic.
- Original crown.
- The case doesn't seems too polished.
- The seconds hand is a replacement.
- Some rotor rub on the caseback which is unlikely a problem as the watch was serviced in March 2020.

Do you see any red flags?
Thank you. 😀

Screenshot-20210619-121003.jpg

Screenshot-20210619-121019.jpg

Screenshot-20210619-121029.jpg

Screenshot-20210619-121040.jpg

Screenshot-20210619-121051.jpg

Screenshot-20210619-121101.jpg

Screenshot-20210619-121111.jpg

Screenshot-20210619-121120.jpg

Screenshot-20210619-121128.jpg
 
Posts
3,312
Likes
12,918
The attractiveness of patina is very subjective, but this one should certainly effect the price - in the other direction than what the seller thought. 1045€ is completely insane for it in my opinion, a third of the price would be realistic.

And just a tiny thing re the service: I’d expect a watch with a fresh service to be regulated so that the regulator itself is actually in a centric position. Avoid this one.
 
Posts
1,372
Likes
2,000
I find it curious that the movement shot has two watermarks. I don't know what it means, but it is unusual.
 
Posts
117
Likes
106
You guys are truly amazing. You are telling me what’s wrong but I am struggling to see it myself. 🙁
 
Posts
8,266
Likes
67,804
@MtV is absolutely right.
Personally, I couldn’t live with that patina. I’d keep looking. This 165.003 was an eBay BIN for about £450, 6 months ago so better and cheaper is out there