OMEGA APOLLO SOYUZ: Happy 45th birthday

Posts
68
Likes
60
Yes, I agree, this makes sense for high volume watches, like the standard Speedmaster Professional, though I think that for small limited editions, like the AS 500 LE, minimum volumes are (were) probably smaller, like the 100 number my friend told me.

He works close with the Omega Museum, so I took his comment as good info. I will research this further.

Another example, I have a Volvo racing Planet Ocean, it is a LE of only 78 pieces. How many dials they ordered or built for 78 watches?

I am sure they now have a process for small manufacturing runs, and large manufacturing runs.

Not sure how this was handled in the 70's. There was no "just in time" supply chain, "lean" manufacturing concepts, etc...

Take are!
 
Posts
182
Likes
146
I don't understand why there is disagreement about Demarchi receiving spare parts.

If you accept the Omega extract as accurate that a watch was part of a batch transformed by Demarchi AND you accept that the Demarchi watches had everything except the case with 5.5mm pushers, then why is there a reluctance to believe Demarchi received the parts from Omega? How could they transform a watch from parts they didn't receive? I don't understand this part of the discussion.

it's very simple!
it is very likely that the Italian Ditrubutore has received a couple of bracelets or a couple of dials but it is very unlikely that OMEGA has sent a fifth of the production:
- 100 bracelets
- 200 finals
- 100 caseback
- 100 dials
- 100 bezel per watch

fundamental for the transformation from Speedmaster to AS.

and then, to complete the transformation, De Marchi should also have received:
-100 cases,
-100 movements
-200 pushers

therefore, De Marchi also had to receive these above or have an important stock in stock ...

forgive me though ... with all due respect ... 200 pushers in stock ... it seems idiocy ... how many of you have ever changed puscher on a Speedmaster ???

and then, why convert a Speedmaster, (a watch known to the world, compared to the AS) with strange spare parts for the end customer ...?

Could one or two customers have requested this transformation? yes, it is possible but not for 70 or 100 customers.

and then, if instead De Marchi had received all the correct spare parts, why mount the watches in the wrong way?

and then, where did the correct movements go (39.180xx and 39.181.xxx) ?

and then, because we have the testimony of a former De Marchi employee who claims that all the watches arrived already assembled by OMEGA. De Marchi's work was centered on distribution.

and then, OMEGA's change of course without "concrete evidence" of this expedition closes the game with even more doubts!

and then, this statement, so clear and categorical, came very late and communicated in this way has the flavor of an attempt ... to silence all this.

this is my thought and I don't expect it to be approved by anyone.
I just say, just think of these words of mine
thank you
 
Posts
29,117
Likes
75,251
Yes, I agree, this makes sense for high volume watches, like the standard Speedmaster Professional, though I think that for small limited editions, like the AS 500 LE, minimum volumes are (were) probably smaller, like the 100 number my friend told me.

But experience shows that this is not the way it actually works. Look at the Mitsukoshi Speedmaster - LE of 300 pieces so smaller than the 500 for AS. I'm quite sure there are more "converted" watches out there than the original 300 units. Omega has dials in stock for these and has had since the beginning, and they have been sold in huge numbers over the years. I have one in stock in my shop right now.

Japan racing dials, Gemini dials...there are all kinds of these dials available as spare parts from, Omega, and hundreds and hundreds of watches have been converted using these spare parts. Omega keeps stock of all of these, so to say they wouldn't have made plenty of extras for a watch that was a 500 piece run just doesn't fit with reality. MOQ would include lots of spares to keep for repairs.

It makes no logistical or economic sense to order dials for what you know would be a 500 piece run, in batches of 100.

And as you point out, this is in the era of JIT and lean manufacturing, which didn't really exist back when these were made. Even more reason to believe that the orders were larger.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
29,117
Likes
75,251
i
forgive me though ... with all due respect ... 200 pushers in stock ... it seems idiocy ... how many of you have ever changed puscher on a Speedmaster ???

I've changed lots. Although I don't keep 200 in stock, I probably have 30 in stock at any given time, and I'm a one man shop.
 
Posts
68
Likes
60
it's very simple!
it is very likely that the Italian Ditrubutore has received a couple of bracelets or a couple of dials but it is very unlikely that OMEGA has sent a fifth of the production:
- 100 bracelets
- 200 finals
- 100 caseback
- 100 dials
- 100 bezel per watch

fundamental for the transformation from Speedmaster to AS.

and then, to complete the transformation, De Marchi should also have received:
-100 cases,
-100 movements
-200 pushers

therefore, De Marchi also had to receive these above or have an important stock in stock ...

forgive me though ... with all due respect ... 200 pushers in stock ... it seems idiocy ... how many of you have ever changed puscher on a Speedmaster ???

and then, why convert a Speedmaster, (a watch known to the world, compared to the AS) with strange spare parts for the end customer ...?

Could one or two customers have requested this transformation? yes, it is possible but not for 70 or 100 customers.

and then, if instead De Marchi had received all the correct spare parts, why mount the watches in the wrong way?

and then, where did the correct movements go (39.180xx and 39.181.xxx) ?

and then, because we have the testimony of a former De Marchi employee who claims that all the watches arrived already assembled by OMEGA. De Marchi's work was centered on distribution.

and then, OMEGA's change of course without "concrete evidence" of this expedition closes the game with even more doubts!

and then, this statement, so clear and categorical, came very late and communicated in this way has the flavor of an attempt ... to silence all this.

this is my thought and I don't expect it to be approved by anyone.
I just say, just think of these words of mine
thank you

Hello my friend,

The transformation that Omega acknowledged in my extract (watch #468) is from a standard Speedmater into a AS De Marchi, originating from the batch of Speedmasters that De Marchi received in june of 1975.

As you said, there is no evidence that a large number of parts were shipped (to transform 70 to 100 watches), though neither (solid) evidence that the watches were shipped already transformed.

I actually don't think there are 70 to 100 AS De Marchi's. I have seen very few... Actually less than 10 if you follow the criteria used to issue the extract for #468.

Your theory "that no transformation was made in Fratelli De Marchi" might be right, why not, but there is no hard evidence to say you are 100% correct, though neither to say you are not correct.

The testimony of the De Marchi employee, saying "no transformation occurred in Torino", is interesting, even credible, though it is hard take it as evidence by itself. It is a testimony, an opinion. It makes (more) sense to me if the number of transformed watches was large (70 to 100), but not for a small batch (10 or less). Maybe the person you spoke with not even noticed the transformation of a small batch (all numbered in the 400's)... These are exactly the grey areas.

I don't think that Omega is trying to silence anyone. They are just reaching conclusions based on the available facts. Watch #468 originates from a batch of standard Speedmasters shipped to Torino in june of 1975 (you have the invoice), and it has a unique LE number that doesn't repeat, with the correct bracelet. This in my opinion leads to indicate that the transformation occurred in Italy, not knowing exactly when, using parts (dials, bracelets, casebacks) that somehow made it there, this is the most likely scenario.

This is an exceptional story by itself, and you have a fantastic piece! We can dig and dig and dig... Maybe we find more, maybe not. Documented facts are important. A lot of progress has been made, and your work has been a big part of all this! Thank you!

Regards
 
Posts
68
Likes
60
But experience shows that this is not the way it actually works. Look at the Mitsukoshi Speedmaster - LE of 300 pieces so smaller than the 500 for AS. I'm quite sure there are more "converted" watches out there than the original 300 units. Omega has dials in stock for these and has had since the beginning, and they have been sold in huge numbers over the years. I have one in stock in my shop right now.

Japan racing dials, Gemini dials...there are all kinds of these dials available as spare parts from, Omega, and hundreds and hundreds of watches have been converted using these spare parts. Omega keeps stock of all of these, so to say they wouldn't have made plenty of extras for a watch that was a 500 piece run just doesn't fit with reality. MOQ would include lots of spares to keep for repairs.

It makes no logistical or economic sense to order dials for what you know would be a 500 piece run, in batches of 100.

And as you point out, this is in the era of JIT and lean manufacturing, which didn't really exist back when these were made. Even more reason to believe that the orders were larger.

Cheers, Al

Ok, so if you are correct maybe Omega ordered 1,000 AS dials... If I am correct they ordered 500 or 600... Who knows right?

I am assuming the number was closer to 500 because I don't see hundreds of "AS watches" where ONLY the dial is correct. There are some, yes.

I just leave it here, unless I have better info.

Thank you!
 
Posts
18,058
Likes
27,372
Ok, so if you are correct maybe Omega ordered 1,000 AS dials... If I am correct they ordered 500 or 600... Who knows right?

I am assuming the number was closer to 500 because I don't see hundreds of "AS watches" where ONLY the dial is correct. There are some, yes.

I just leave it here, unless I have better info.

Thank you!
And they all have Italian delivery... it’s way more then 2 watches.

also You still haven’t figured out who made the dials? It’s pretty obvious.

I guess you could argue the dial maker didn’t put the AS logo on the watch and that’s a later added screen print. Which could be plausible.

also the Volvo Ocean Racing is not an LE. It’s also currently available.
 
Posts
182
Likes
146
I am not quite in agreement here that 400 to 476 were assigned. It is a reasonable hypothesis but not conclusive to me because watchmakers grabbed parts from bins sometimes randomly, which is why serial numbers of watches are sometimes older.

From what I read, there are only 4 of these watches in the 400 range and there is one extract from Omega the states there was a batch transformed by Demarchi (and that watch did not have 5.5mm).

To me, the extract could simply be saying that the watch is an original speedmaster that has some parts from the AS edition but should be considered original because it was transformed by an Authorized dealer. That is not the same as Omega saying the watch is an AS edition. They are simply saying it isn't a franken. Is this in agreement?

so far I have touched at least 7 watches. however, if we keep Omega's initial rule, which said that: "The real Apollo-Soyuz" has a movement between 39.180.xxx and 39.181.xxx, it means that the numbers:
-39.920.661
-45.585.460
-39.927.934
are to be considered out of range like these numbers 286, 288, 416, 461, 468, etc ...

I remember it all began when I asked OMEGA to better check the shipping data of my watch; from Omega to De Marchi. Omega claimed it was impossible that my 416 could be considered a true Apollo Soyuz since it had a movement from 1972.
THE MUSEUM NEVER ASKED ME ANYTHING ABOUT THE SIZE OF THE PUSCHERS or other parts ... They were more focused on identifying the model by the movement number.
Fortunately the OMEGA museum found my watch's shipping document confirming that my Omega was sent to the Italian distributor in 1975.
ok, this was the past, now ... we TURN THE PAGE ... I have a dream; that OMEGA would one day catalog all the Apollo Soyuz watches currently in circulation.
nothing else! at least to consolidate what exists today and above all to avoid what happened with the Rolex 5517 (produced in 1000 copies, today we find 1500 pieces ...😕)
 
Posts
182
Likes
146
Hello my friend,

The transformation that Omega acknowledged in my extract (watch #468) is from a standard Speedmater into a AS De Marchi, originating from the batch of Speedmasters that De Marchi received in june of 1975.

As you said, there is no evidence that a large number of parts were shipped (to transform 70 to 100 watches), though neither (solid) evidence that the watches were shipped already transformed.

I actually don't think there are 70 to 100 AS De Marchi's. I have seen very few... Actually less than 10 if you follow the criteria used to issue the extract for #468.

Your theory "that no transformation was made in Fratelli De Marchi" might be right, why not, but there is no hard evidence to say you are 100% correct, though neither to say you are not correct.

The testimony of the De Marchi employee, saying "no transformation occurred in Torino", is interesting, even credible, though it is hard take it as evidence by itself. It is a testimony, an opinion. It makes (more) sense to me if the number of transformed watches was large (70 to 100), but not for a small batch (10 or less). Maybe the person you spoke with not even noticed the transformation of a small batch (all numbered in the 400's)... These are exactly the grey areas.

I don't think that Omega is trying to silence anyone. They are just reaching conclusions based on the available facts. Watch #468 originates from a batch of standard Speedmasters shipped to Torino in june of 1975 (you have the invoice), and it has a unique LE number that doesn't repeat, with the correct bracelet. This in my opinion leads to indicate that the transformation occurred in Italy, not knowing exactly when, using parts (dials, bracelets, casebacks) that somehow made it there, this is the most likely scenario.

This is an exceptional story by itself, and you have a fantastic piece! We can dig and dig and dig... Maybe we find more, maybe not. Documented facts are important. A lot of progress has been made, and your work has been a big part of all this! Thank you!

Regards


it is I who must thank you for your testimony and for sharing new elements but above all also for the new hypotheses that make me reflect

Thanks so much
 
Posts
5,980
Likes
20,535
i don’t mean to be rude here, but if your not aware of who makes the dials for Speedmaster Professionals, as well as all the other watches this dial maker is known for I wouldn’t be presenting data. I’d be asking a lot of questions. Some of these watches rhyme with schumona or tamitimer...


It’s pretty basic watch knowledge. I’ve never heard of 100 piece batches ever.

https://omegaforums.net/threads/swiss-dial-manufactures-of-the-1930s-1940s.79585/

The internet giveth. Seems a little circular though 😉
 
Posts
68
Likes
60
And they all have Italian delivery... it’s way more then 2 watches.

also You still haven’t figured out who made the dials? It’s pretty obvious.

I guess you could argue the dial maker didn’t put the AS logo on the watch and that’s a later added screen print. Which could be plausible.

also the Volvo Ocean Racing is not an LE. It’s also currently available.

Omega ordered dials, which is obvious because they build hundreds of AS watches. The rest I don't know, you tell me.

Regarding my Volvo Planet Ocean watch, yes... I made a mistake, the LE is of 73 pieces, not 78.

In 2018 Omega released a 73 piece limited edition (ref: 215.92.46.51.01.002). It is a black/red version of the Seamaster Planet Ocean Deep Black. One of the 73 pieces was handed over to the skipper of the Dongfeng Race Team. The other 72 pieces were available at Omega boutiques. Attached is the picture. The watch is sold out.

Regards

 
Posts
182
Likes
146
And they all have Italian delivery... it’s way more then 2 watches.

also You still haven’t figured out who made the dials? It’s pretty obvious.

I guess you could argue the dial maker didn’t put the AS logo on the watch and that’s a later added screen print. Which could be plausible.

also the Volvo Ocean Racing is not an LE. It’s also currently available.

you're too strong ... in your opinion it's all obvious ... YOU know everything ...
OMEGA was really stupid not to call you ...
everyone wasted years and time ...
it was enough to ask you for explanations and you would have enlightened us from the top of your great knowledge ... it's obvious ...😉
 
Posts
68
Likes
60
so far I have touched at least 7 watches. however, if we keep Omega's initial rule, which said that: "The real Apollo-Soyuz" has a movement between 39.180.xxx and 39.181.xxx, it means that the numbers:
-39.920.661
-45.585.460
-39.927.934
are to be considered out of range like these numbers 286, 288, 416, 461, 468, etc ...

I remember it all began when I asked OMEGA to better check the shipping data of my watch; from Omega to De Marchi. Omega claimed it was impossible that my 416 could be considered a true Apollo Soyuz since it had a movement from 1972.
THE MUSEUM NEVER ASKED ME ANYTHING ABOUT THE SIZE OF THE PUSCHERS or other parts ... They were more focused on identifying the model by the movement number.
Fortunately the OMEGA museum found my watch's shipping document confirming that my Omega was sent to the Italian distributor in 1975.
ok, this was the past, now ... we TURN THE PAGE ... I have a dream; that OMEGA would one day catalog all the Apollo Soyuz watches currently in circulation.
nothing else! at least to consolidate what exists today and above all to avoid what happened with the Rolex 5517 (produced in 1000 copies, today we find 1500 pieces ...😕)

There is a pattern with watches: 416, 461, 468 and most likely 469 (all come from the batch of 158 Speedmasters that were shipped to De Marchi in june of 1975). These are firmly considered AS De Marchi (as shown in my extract, which I already made public).

I don't have the details of 286 and 288. I think they have 5mm pushers. It will be interesting to know the movement numbers, and see if they follow the same pattern. So far I have only seen it in watches in the 4xx's.

The so called "out of range" category are like the ones you indicated:

-39.920.661
-45.585.460
-39.927.934

These have 5.5mm pushers, and yes, they don't follow the Bienne production/movement rule, neither the De Marchi pattern. So... I don't know, I don't want to speculate further on the pieces.

The register is a good idea, though I don't see Omega doing it. I love the brand, and the AS Speedy, and I think Omega settle things regarding the AS De Marchi in a reasonable and smart way, with enough evidence to sustain what they did.

We both have been working on this for years... I agree with you on many things, but not fully on some, which is ok.

Thank you as always!
 
Posts
68
Likes
60
you're too strong ... in your opinion it's all obvious ... YOU know everything ...
OMEGA was really stupid not to call you ...
everyone wasted years and time ...
it was enough to ask you for explanations and you would have enlightened us from the top of your great knowledge ... it's obvious ...😉

Omg, I guess you guys will not meet any time soon for coffee (or a beer)!

Too much passion...
 
Posts
5,980
Likes
20,535
so far I have touched at least 7 watches...

it means that the numbers:
-39.920.661
-45.585.460
-39.927.934
are to be considered out of range like these numbers 286, 288, 416, 461, 468, etc ...

I remember it all began when I asked OMEGA to better check the shipping data of my watch; from Omega to De Marchi. Omega claimed it was impossible that my 416 could be considered a true Apollo Soyuz since it had a movement from 1972.
THE MUSEUM NEVER ASKED ME ANYTHING ABOUT THE SIZE OF THE PUSCHERS or other parts ... They were more focused on identifying the model by the movement number.

Fortunately the OMEGA museum found my watch's shipping document confirming that my Omeg was sent to the Italian distributor in 1975.

One aspect that could help clarify the discussion (at least for me) is the number of watches being discussed. It's seems there are only a few, perhaps as few as 7. I have read conclusions stating as many as 70 to 100 or other statements that seem to indicate there are many watches. But we keep coming back to one, two, or as many as seven.

From our discussion here, I think we have agreed that any watch with only a dial is illegitimate, so my assumption is that we would only raise evidence from a watch that has all elements except the case and 5.5mm pushers. Again, those are very few. There may be many watches with only the AS dial but if we agreed that they are not legitimate then we can ignore those, correct? (I am assuming the 286, 288, 416, 461 and 468 all have every element except the 5.5mm pushers, which we are referring to as the AS Demarchi group.)

The reason I bring this up is frankly, it is problematic to me to draw conclusions about an entire production based on an oddball watch or two. I now understand why people approach this with scepticism.

Also, did you have a follow up discussion with Omega regarding the other elements besides the serial number? I myself would not be able to draw a conclusion about whether a watch is authentic based on this one discussion with Omega. Omega simply did what everyone does when evaluating a watch, they went to the most obvious data point, which was the serial number. No sense looking further if the first data is incorrect. So once you determined the 416 was a normal speedmaster shipped to De Marchi, what did they say next? (I apologize if this was already discussed.)

From what I have read thus far, the 416 does not have an extract from Omega stating it was transformed but the 468 does have an extract saying it was transformed. Is this an accurate statement?
 
Posts
5,980
Likes
20,535
Omg, I guess you guys will not meet any time soon for coffee (or a beer)!

Too much passion...

Sometimes this is the best time to meet for a beer.
 
Posts
68
Likes
60
it is I who must thank you for your testimony and for sharing new elements but above all also for the new hypotheses that make me reflect

Thanks so much

You are welcome! The AS De Marchi is so interesting...

For the last two years I have been trying to put together all the pieces of the story, and this is where we are, though not much progress has been made in the last six months, except that I now question if there really are 70 to 100 AS De Marchi's, that follow the "transformation pattern". So far I have confirmed 3 watches, maybe 4. There could well be more though.

We will keep making progress!
 
Posts
29,117
Likes
75,251
Omega ordered dials, which is obvious because they build hundreds of AS watches. The rest I don't know, you tell me.

Regarding my Volvo Planet Ocean watch, yes... I made a mistake, the LE is of 73 pieces, not 78.

In 2018 Omega released a 73 piece limited edition (ref: 215.92.46.51.01.002). It is a black/red version of the Seamaster Planet Ocean Deep Black. One of the 73 pieces was handed over to the skipper of the Dongfeng Race Team. The other 72 pieces were available at Omega boutiques. Attached is the picture. The watch is sold out.

Regards


Replacement dials are available from Omega if you need one - part number is 064QMZ010527. 😉
 
Posts
18,058
Likes
27,372
you're too strong ... in your opinion it's all obvious ... YOU know everything ...
OMEGA was really stupid not to call you ...
everyone wasted years and time ...
it was enough to ask you for explanations and you would have enlightened us from the top of your great knowledge ... it's obvious ...😉
Your the one presenting things as facts when they are not. You constantly make 2 logical errors on n your deductions.

the first is basically this. Prove unicorns do not exist. You prove it by saying it be not seen one nor has anyone I know. The problem is that is not proof.

2nd logically in the mid to late 70’s the things that everyone has have postulated make way more sense then your explanation.