The price drop seems to be due to the light scratches on the rear of the lugs and case back.
As for all the on-line photos and reviews giving enough info to make an informed choice, the most are (I suspect) paid for, i.e. biased. So however great the watch is things will be "overlooked". I did a "warts and all" review of my Globemaster a few days ago. With such a review you can find out what a particular watch is really like ....I still love it by the way. I have yet to see such a full and frank review of any of the Trilogy watches. Perhaps I should do one for my Railmaster?
For the sake of balance I'll throw in the following -ve observations:-
1) the bracelet seems to me to be a bit too heavy and as with most other Omega bracelets was probably finished by Gillette or Wilkinson Sword...it is sharp.
2) the leather strap does not have rear cut-outs like on my GM which makes removal a pain in the butt if you are not practiced/skilled in this task (the scratched lugs on that SM doesn't surprise me in the slightest).
3) The polished outer links are picking up scratches real fast....this will be an issue on each and every Trilogy watch. Interestingly the watch head is pretty much scratch free.
4) the clasp is showing more desk diver swirls than I had expected so soon after purchase.
5) I have stopped using the micro-adjustment extension clasp because it hardly adds any er extension. Nice idea, could do better.
But you know what, I don't give a stuff about any of those points, because the Railmaster is a sublime watch. I don't care if it drops to just 10% of it's purchase price, it's a keeper for a watch lover, not a speculator/flipper. Mine has already been mistaken for the '57 original and I suspect after a few more years (ab)use it will look identical.
So, in summary it's not all fair weather with the Trilogies, but the flaws are minimal and they will all be great additions to most WIS's collections.
Click to expand...