From what I have read online, no and no.
I know this is a bit against the grain from the opinions I've heard here, but I like the Trilogy print with serial number. It is unique and special, and in my mind makes an LE even more limited. Reminds me of the word "Meister" written on the dial of some rare vintage examples. I'm a fan.
Man, seems like your putting yourself through a lot of stress and additional expense in the hopes of getting matching printed numbers that you won't even keep on your watches.
I would think Omega would only consider a change if no one wanted the trilogy printed on the dial and they thought they would have trouble selling them as is. It doesn't sound like they are worried about the demand.
W
Why is this do you know? The size is right at 19mm and I can't imagine the case curvature to be any different. Regarding selling separately there is no reason why I can see that they wouldn't sell it through a boutique or deaker like any other available replacement part. I would suggest yes and yes personally.
W
Why is this do you know? The size is right at 19mm and I can't imagine the case curvature to be any different. Regarding selling separately there is no reason why I can see that they wouldn't sell it through a boutique or deaker like any other available replacement part. I would suggest yes and yes personally.
Just as important as the lug width and case diameter is the location of the springbar holes - you need all three to get a bracelet to fit, and the latter is the most difficult to determine just from reading specifications.
I know this is a bit against the grain from the opinions I've heard here, but I like the Trilogy print with serial number. It is unique and special, and in my mind makes an LE even more limited. Reminds me of the word "Meister" written on the dial of some rare vintage examples. I'm a fan.
Why is this do you know? The size is right at 19mm and I can't imagine the case curvature to be any different. Regarding selling separately there is no reason why I can see that they wouldn't sell it through a boutique or deaker like any other available replacement part. I would suggest yes and yes personally.
These wrist shots came from this article, if you guys need more:
https://www.lesrhabilleurs.com/baselworld-2017-omega-speedmaster-railmaster-seamaster/
Only problem is now I really want the SM300 in addition to the speedy I've already ordered. Every time I see live photos of these I'm just blown away. Not making the wait any easier...QUOTE said:That makes two of us!
It's not just the width, CK2915 reissues tend to look small because of the steel bezel, there is less black so it can make the dial look small.
My re-issue from the late 90's is above, there's a lot of steel to the eye from the case and the bezel which de-emphasizes the dial. I happen to think its one of the best features, its why I view this watch (and the 60th) as a cool changeup to my standard moonwatch, but I can see where those who are used to today's oversized watches could be put off.
Just as important as the lug width and case diameter is the location of the springbar holes - you need all three to get a bracelet to fit, and the latter is the most difficult to determine just from reading specifications.
it would be bloody minded of them in the extreme to have created a bracelet which was deliberately so different in bar position as to not fit other 19mm Speedmaster models which are so similar in other ways
Deliberately would imply nefarious intent, a want on the company's part to intentionally confound owners who wanted to swap parts. If it turns out the lug holes are differently place, I would be confident it was subservient to the needs of the design.
Ah. Sorry for the failed research on my part. Was it on another OF thread?