Forums Latest Members

OMEGA 1957 Trilogy Limited Editions – Railmaster, Seamaster 300, Speedmaster’57

  1. T<25 Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    319
    Likes
    1,395
    I see the 60th LE speedy as a great addition augmented to vintage speedies for collectors. It's useable and replaceable compared to the original. Also 38.6mm is a great size. I personally will pick this over ST for the case dimensions.
     
    demchocholips likes this.
  2. BenjaminT Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    270
    Likes
    964
    Hey, what's the Ref. of the second from the right? That would be my watch!
     
  3. ConElPueblo Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    I am curious - what difference should the 40m of WR make?

    A watch with a 60m WR will be perfectly suited to swimming. If it should let in water, it would be due to a fault - that fault would be just as likely to happen on the 100m WR watch...
     
    KstateSkier likes this.
  4. RJwatches Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    465
    Likes
    773
    Railmaster heaven jeez
     
  5. padders Oooo subtitles! Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    8,995
    Likes
    13,941
    It is not 60m anyhow, it is 150m rated, the 60m is a typo. If you look at Omega's website the full name of the new LE RM is Aqua Terra 150m Railmaster etc. Why would it be the only AT with a lower WR?
     
  6. ConElPueblo Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    Funnily enough, the old red boxes are more than capable of staying in one piece - it's the later ones that disintegrate without warning :D

    Have a look for yourself here.
     
  7. DIV Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    1,205
    Likes
    1,656
    I'm not as familiar with the 8806 movement. Does it have the "jump" hour hand feature like the 8400 of the Seamaster 300MC?
     
  8. padders Oooo subtitles! Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    8,995
    Likes
    13,941
    Apparently not.
     
  9. Tritium Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    1,206
    Likes
    1,654
    Trying to figure what "jump hour" means.
    Does the watches equiped with this feature, have an especific position on the crown to set just the hour hand?
     
    Edited Mar 23, 2017
  10. Mr Gadget Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    391
    Likes
    483
    Does anybody know what the UK price will be?
     
  11. DIV Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    1,205
    Likes
    1,656
    See here, at the 5:25--
     
    Spy and Tritium like this.
  12. kov Trüffelschwein. Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    4,113
    Likes
    16,085
    That TRILOGY script and LE number in the 557 LE is a real show stopper imho ::puke::

    IMG_7311.JPG IMG_7312.JPG

    Why!?!? ::facepalm1::
     
    SouthernScot, lando, sgtpry and 6 others like this.
  13. Tritium Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    1,206
    Likes
    1,654
    Thanks:thumbsup:
     
  14. billyblue Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    373
    Likes
    388
    You mean seconds track.
     
  15. padders Oooo subtitles! Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    8,995
    Likes
    13,941
    It is both if you think about it.
     
    lando, Linzer and ConElPueblo like this.
  16. g-boac Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    433
    Likes
    381
    Exactly. If the first position is screwed down and the second position is unscrewed (for winding), the third position is typically for datesetting. In the case of a jump-hour hand this position is typically used to jump the hand forward or backward by an hour instead of datesetting. (You set the date by jumping the hand forward or backward 24 clicks in this case.). The fourth and final position hacks the movement and allows time setting.
     
  17. Greatpa Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    481
    Likes
    944
    If you thought the fcked up the Railmaster, here you go, they have another shot.. (via. Fratellowatches)
    upload_2017-3-23_12-49-17.png
     
  18. padders Oooo subtitles! Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    8,995
    Likes
    13,941
  19. Greatpa Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    481
    Likes
    944
    padders likes this.
  20. DIV Mar 23, 2017

    Posts
    1,205
    Likes
    1,656
    I woke up 24 hours ago and saw this Railmaster and I was slightly relieved thinking"oh, that's ugly, well, I guess my money is safe", then I saw "the other one, the LE version"....oops....near sleepless night