Forums Latest Members

Basel 2017 - Omega Railmaster Master Co-Axial Line (non-LE)

  1. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    26,946
    Likes
    32,634
    These appear to be completely separate from the 60th anniversary LE and would be a continuation of the normal production Railmaster line that was discontinued in the Cal 2500 era. The crosshair and stick hands are an interesting choice for it as is the crosshair on the dial but I don't quite feel it as much as the 2914 LE version.

    Baselworld 2017 - 1.jpg Baselworld 2017 - 2 (1).jpg Baselworld 2017 - 17.jpg
     
  2. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    Will that Lolli fit the new seamaster? :D
     
  3. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    26,946
    Likes
    32,634
    Interesting question, the Railmaster is 38mm apparently which is slightly smaller but it also has less bezel so the hand may be the right size. Getting a hold of one would be the tricky part though I'd imagine.
     
  4. KstateSkier Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    838
    Likes
    3,260
    mmmm those lollipop hands are spectacular. #Want
     
    Jwit likes this.
  5. M'Bob Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    6,396
    Likes
    18,165
    Cross-hairs make the dial too busy. What was wrong with understated?
     
  6. demollo Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    1,298
    Likes
    640
    I agree, the cross-hairs kinda ruined the watch for me. I do love the Lolli hand :)
     
  7. OMGRLX a RolexBear in disguise Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    1,151
    Likes
    2,989
    much better looking than any modern explorer out there. :thumbsup:
     
  8. Riviera Paradise Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    2,152
    Likes
    3,650
    Sorry, can't agree with you on that at all. I think the 2016 Explorer is much more elegant and better proportioned....but this is subjective personal taste...
    20160926_083302.jpg
     
    cicindela, Richmortrd, TJH and 14 others like this.
  9. cristos71 Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    7,155
    Likes
    32,933
    One word......and it rhymes with fugly :thumbsdown:
     
  10. Davidt Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    10,399
    Likes
    18,069
    Yuck.

    Home run with the LE then manage to balls it up with this abomination.
     
    micampe, Knezz, M'Bob and 1 other person like this.
  11. Jwit Not a doctor, but plays one on ΩF Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    2,361
    Likes
    12,632
    Cross hairs are just too much. It's still a good looking piece but with the pre aged lume, and white numerals and wording and aged Railmaster font there is just too much going on. And I wish they put Swiss made below (or even above) the rail track. In the middle is just blah.

    I do love the hands, especially the lollipop. Bracelet looks great but I'm really digging that denim style strap right now.
     
    FatPhil likes this.
  12. DIV Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    1,205
    Likes
    1,656
    In my opinion, the crosshairs and minute track are a mistake. I wish they would have just planned to produce the LE Railmaster as a regular run at a lower cost and not mess with this Railmaster.....it's going to add some confusion too. Another case of Omega just releasing too many watch models....
     
    jB1128 and cristos71 like this.
  13. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    26,946
    Likes
    32,634
    I have this feeling that these might be pieces that grow on you over time a bit, particularly if they're priced aggressively and come with a thinner case than other models as a more entry level offering which is sort of the vibe I get off them being no-bezel no-date and externally simplistic. There have been times in the past when models have been modified between Basel and market too so I wonder if there's a chance that the crosshairs might be removed between now and then.
     
    DIV and Nobel Prize like this.
  14. Jwit Not a doctor, but plays one on ΩF Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    2,361
    Likes
    12,632
    Maybe if we rip on the crosshairs enough they will see it and remove them before release[​IMG]
     
  15. ConElPueblo Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,977
    Sorry, but this is a bad, bad design. It looks like a cheap fake.

    When I saw the renders I couldn't help but think to myself "I bet they've managed to screw it up somehow" and now that seems to be confirmed.
     
  16. Df13 Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    275
    Likes
    456
    Yeah, it just goes to show that Omega's designers in the '50s were
    still a notch above. The limited blows this out of the water.
     
    ffej4 and Knezz like this.
  17. Trev The Architect Staff Member Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    1,892
    Likes
    1,757
    Fixed them. :)

    Baselworld 2017 - 17.jpg Baselworld 2017 - 2 (1).jpg Baselworld 2017 - 1.jpg
     
  18. Davidt Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    10,399
    Likes
    18,069
    It's not just the crosshairs, the whole watch look clumsy with the lyre case.

    Like Tom Hanks in Big, when he shrinks back to a child and is stuck wearing the adult sized suit.
     
    ConElPueblo likes this.
  19. M'Bob Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    6,396
    Likes
    18,165
    Thanks. I was wrong: still ugly.
     
  20. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Mar 22, 2017

    Posts
    26,946
    Likes
    32,634
    Definitely much better though the twisted lugs do look a bit too elaborate for the simple and utilitarian dial still. Dump the crosshairs, go straight lug and drop the price to a really good entry point and it becomes a cool piece but it does feel a bit confused still as it is.
     
    noelekal, FatPhil and Davidt like this.