Forums Latest Members

OMEGA 1957 Trilogy Limited Editions – Railmaster, Seamaster 300, Speedmaster’57

  1. Theognosis Oct 24, 2017

    Posts
    231
    Likes
    497
    Geez, I forgot to mention about that one! That crystal when viewed from an angle is like a whirlpool that sucks you right into the middle of the dial. A-M-A-Z-I-N-G.

    I'll give the Trilogy bracelet a score of 8/10 and give the modern non-Glidelock Rolexes a 9/10. It's a great effort from Omega (from whatever country it came from since I couldn't find any "Swiss Made" marking on the bracelet and clasp).

    Hahaha... You're putting your loyalty to the test, eh?
     
  2. arcadelt Oct 24, 2017

    Posts
    1,038
    Likes
    1,299
    Actually, I saw a post once that shows that the Glidelock bracelet from the 116610 can be natively fitted to the 16610, so it is possible to get the it on a slimmer case. Of course, then you miss out on the ceramic bezel - it’s shiny, but oh so scratch resistant.
     
  3. dethree Oct 24, 2017

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    9
    IMG_20171024_164728-01.jpeg
    Second day wearing this, fits nicely on 6.7 inch wrist. Love to wear this everyday but worrying about scratching that shiny lug and case when putting wrist on table
     
    frazierspa, Kmart, mikechi22 and 6 others like this.
  4. munichblue Oct 24, 2017

    Posts
    618
    Likes
    2,993
    It’s such a beauty!

    02C64246-CE59-4C05-969C-CC0B7C6AE7F6.jpeg
     
    frazierspa, HJO, Kmart and 9 others like this.
  5. Mtnmansa Oct 24, 2017

    Posts
    274
    Likes
    1,369
    I’ve had the RMLE about 6 weeks now, and never even had the bracelet on, as I felt it overwhelmed the relative simplicity and beauty of it.
    Had the 60th Speedmaster for a week and for me, the bracelet complements the sporty Speedy as I think it was intended as in ‘57. The clasp felt bulky for about an hour and now it seems perfectly balanced.
    (I’ve ordered a replacement bracelet for the Speedy)
     
    904B6405-6F91-4C9B-98BB-79A330D994AC.jpeg 04CFB94E-EAA5-4EAA-A9D6-581675CC3180.jpeg
    thogi, frazierspa, mikechi22 and 4 others like this.
  6. Mtnmansa Oct 24, 2017

    Posts
    274
    Likes
    1,369
    Beautiful, I thought the same thing. They say the first scratch is the hardest!
    There are some 60 yr old original ones floating around in great condition so I’m sure in 60 yrs ours will look as good if not better
     
    86BE56AC-B333-4E39-AD73-04A262CAE674.jpeg
    jackjacob, Pun, frazierspa and 6 others like this.
  7. Theognosis Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    231
    Likes
    497
    I rate a watch in its entirety. The RMLE is a beautiful watch. The 116610 is the doped version of the 16610 with fat lugs and a great bracelet. The Deepsea is a 44mm behemoth with skinny bracelet (even the Glidelock couldn't save the look).

    As for the 16610, I'd skip the idea of replacing the original flimsy bracelet with a modern one. It will lose its vintage appeal. :)
     
  8. surf4life Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    12
    Likes
    2
    The more I see pics of the RMLE, the more I’m inclined to pick one up... patiently waiting for my Speedy 60th!

    Great pic!
     
  9. kalvinoz Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    27
    Likes
    40
    I had to part with my RMLE for a few weeks after handling it for only 10 minutes or so, but finally got it back yesterday.

    I wore it with the bracelet during the day. It's nice, but I felt it made the dial look a bit smaller and the whole thing is just a bit too shiny for my liking (and I wear mostly short sleeves at work, so there's no hiding it). This evening I worked out how to remove the bracelet and swapped it for the Bas & Lokes strap I had bought months ago while waiting for the watch to arrive. What a stunner! The picture doesn't do it full justice, but the strap matches the lume really closely - I'll have to try again in daylight. Now I'm truly in love with the watch :)

    IMG_20171025_195727.jpg
     
    Pun, KstateSkier, frazierspa and 7 others like this.
  10. DeerMan Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    2
    Likes
    0
    The strap looks great! Which model is this one - think I will buy one for my Seamster..
     
  11. kalvinoz Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    27
    Likes
    40
    I got the "Jensen" natural leather strap. Just after I ordered they launched the vintage line, which I thought I'd prefer, but now that I have it on the watch I quite like the clean look. It'll get vintage with time, I just need to be patient.
     
    Theognosis likes this.
  12. DeerMan Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    2
    Likes
    0
    Cool - thanks!
     
  13. arcadelt Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    1,038
    Likes
    1,299
    Each to their own - it’s a wonderful world, isn’t it!
     
    Theognosis likes this.
  14. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    So THAT's what's wrong with the vintage model this one is a reproduction of! The clasp is too small!
     
  15. Theognosis Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    231
    Likes
    497
    Peter Lundberg, frazierspa and DIV like this.
  16. DIV Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    1,205
    Likes
    1,656
    One question for the Seamaster owners:
    Do you feel that it is practical enough as a true diver with the BI-directional bezel countdown bezel? I do think there is some merit in the functionality of a UNI-directional bezel when it comes to diving or similar critical timing applications.
    (Maybe I'm trying to put to rest the little voice in my ear that says "get the Seamasters 300LE"....)
     
  17. uwsearch Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    1,055
    Likes
    1,596
    It's about 30 years dive computers made dive watches obsolete, my first Aladin is almost that old. So uni or bidirectionnal bezel is not an issue.
     
    solesman and Theognosis like this.
  18. blokk Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    268
    Likes
    139
    Follow the voice in your ear.
     
    DIV, Theognosis and daddykc like this.
  19. pennsyl936 Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    314
    Likes
    649
    Edited Oct 25, 2017
  20. Theognosis Oct 25, 2017

    Posts
    231
    Likes
    497
    Never put your trust in computers. In the event of an EMP attack from replicants, all high tech equipment will cease to function. But thanks to the all-mechanical and amagnetic (>15,000 Gauss) properties of the SM300LE, you can still enjoy your dive relying on the bidirectional bezel.

    How’s that for a VALID excuse to get the SM300LE? Lol

    Cheers!
     
    Mtnmansa and Agentmeister4 like this.