New Speedmasters: Is 44,25mm to big for daily wear?

Posts
2,152
Likes
3,810
Honestly, I'm totally digging the white dial Speedy, absolutely love it, and prefer it to the Daytona C. I had the fun opportunity while on a trip last month to try on pretty much any current production Daytona I wanted other than the new rubber strap versions just released. I played with the Daytona C, white gold, yellow gold, two tone, platinum, bracelet and strap versions along with a bunch of other configurations. My take away was that while I like their looks, they're too small for me and do not offer the "wrist presence" I enjoy in my personal watch ownership. The strap versions I had trouble fitting over my hand to even try on. Ergo, happy to have tried them all out and happy to know once and for all that they're not for me.

Unfortunately, I missed seeing the grey racing Speedy to offer a report. Hopefully, I can provide some pics of it when I pick up the white dial in a couple months for you!

Thanks Bushido for the kind offer! 馃榾 I have an upcoming trip to the US/Canada in July (might pass through the Vancouver and Houston OBs), but I think it will be too early to see these Speedy Racing live in the OBs.

I find these Racing Speedies more interesting and feature rich watch than the Daytona C, which in IMO only wins out on aesthetics for some (subjective), bragging rights for those that care about status affirmation, and of course resale value if you manage to get a LN at retail pricing.

I am very curious to see these new Speedies live...for me the white dial looks great, I just don't know if it will compete too much with my Polar Exp 2 42mm for wrist attention as I intend to use it more with jeans, polo shirt etc. I have the same "watch clash" concern with the Racing two-tone grey dial version and my Speedy XI-45 LE...although I do think the XI-45 is more of a "golden brown" palette and the Speedy is more neutral grey / gold. When I do finally get a chance to try on these Speedy Racings I will take my Exp 2 and my XI-45 to do my "if I had to choose which one to wear in the morning" test. I am still considering the black dial versions as well. Cheers.
 
Posts
275
Likes
471
Thanks Bushido for the kind offer! 馃榾 I have an upcoming trip to the US/Canada in July (might pass through the Vancouver and Houston OBs), but I think it will be too early to see these Speedy Racing live in the OBs.

I find these Racing Speedies more interesting and feature rich watch than the Daytona C, which in IMO only wins out on aesthetics for some (subjective), bragging rights for those that care about status affirmation, and of course resale value if you manage to get a LN at retail pricing.

I am very curious to see these new Speedies live...for me the white dial looks great, I just don't know if it will compete too much with my Polar Exp 2 42mm for wrist attention as I intend to use it more with jeans, polo shirt etc. I have the same "watch clash" concern with the Racing two-tone grey dial version and my Speedy XI-45 LE...although I do think the XI-45 is more of a "golden brown" palette and the Speedy is more neutral grey / gold. When I do finally get a chance to try on these Speedy Racings I will take my Exp 2 and my XI-45 to do my "if I had to choose which one to wear in the morning" test. I am still considering the black dial versions as well. Cheers.

It's funny. I feel the opposite about the Daytona. I could care less about the status, but I like the Daytona because it's small and thin and has screw down pushers.
 
Posts
1,802
Likes
10,156
Honestly, I'm totally digging the white dial Speedy, absolutely love it, and prefer it to the Daytona C. I had the fun opportunity while on a trip last month to try on pretty much any current production Daytona I wanted other than the new rubber strap versions just released. I played with the Daytona C, white gold, yellow gold, two tone, platinum, bracelet and strap versions along with a bunch of other configurations. My take away was that while I like their looks, they're too small for me and do not offer the "wrist presence" I enjoy in my personal watch ownership. The strap versions I had trouble fitting over my hand to even try on. Ergo, happy to have tried them all out and happy to know once and for all that they're not for me.

Unfortunately, I missed seeing the grey racing Speedy to offer a report. Hopefully, I can provide some pics of it when I pick up the white dial in a couple months for you!
I heat you on the Daytonas. 40mm is the minimum for me, but the Daytona's crowded dial at that size is too small. My GMT2 Pepsi is fine, but there are no sub-dials on the face. Makes it wear a little bigger than it's actual size.

I have 7 3/4" wrists so any 40mm watch I wear needs a bracelet with some presence to fill it out. My sweet spot is 42mm - 44mm, making the new Speedmaster 9300's at 44.25mm ideal for me.
 
Posts
2,152
Likes
3,810
It's funny. I feel the opposite about the Daytona. I could care less about the status, but I like the Daytona because it's small and thin and has screw down pushers.

which in IMO only wins out on aesthetics for some (subjective), bragging rights for those that care about status affirmation

You sir, clearly fall in the bold categories above -- you do not care about bragging rights!馃憤馃槈馃榾
 
Posts
275
Likes
471
which in IMO only wins out on aesthetics for some (subjective), bragging rights for those that care about status affirmation

You sir, clearly fall in the bold categories above -- you do not care about bragging rights!馃憤馃槈馃榾

Yeah, that's the frustrating thing. If I were to look for a chrono, I'd love something small, thin and very waterproof, because I tend to wear my watches doing everything, but I think the Daytona has long been overhyped and overpriced. The thinness is the thing I particularly like about the Daytona.

Of course, I'm essentially "anti-wrist presence" and prefer a watch that feels minimal when using it as an all day, everyday watch.
 
Posts
1,802
Likes
10,156
I go back and forth on the Racing Speedy. On the one hand, it's gorgeous. Great color palate and high legibility. But on the other hand, I'm definitely a minimalist kind of guy. Black dial, white hands and markers - that's my thing.

In the end, I'll hit up a Boutique, try one on, and spend a couple weeks hemming and hawing over buying/not buying it. I'm pretty sure we all know how this will end though. Speedmasters are needful things. 馃榾
 
Posts
1,802
Likes
10,156
If only I knew. The Explorer is a great everyday watch and I just don't know if the same can be said about the Speedmaster. On the other hand, as much as I am drawn to the simple design of the Explorer, the Speedmaster just seems more interesting somehow. The caliber 9900 is much more interesting from a technical perspective, especially. Then again, the Rolex would probably have better resale value if I want to change my decision later. Argh...



I would probably get the black dial version, which is closest to the original Speedmaster design. I will definitely buy it with the bracelet but might experiment with straps as well.

I like the black dial racing version a lot, but I'd prefer white hands on the sub-dials. But that's a pretty minor thing, and I could always have the hands swapped.
 
Posts
1,802
Likes
10,156
I go back and forth on how much wrist presence I want. Some days it's my co-axial Speedmaster and other it's my 40mm Rolex GMT2 Pepsi. On my 7 3/4" wrists it's a striking difference.
 
Posts
1,802
Likes
10,156
Granted, I have large wrists at 7 3/4" but the 44.25mm models do not eclipse my wrist. The Co-Axial models definitely have wrist presence, especially compared to a 40mm Rolex GMT, but it's not overpowering.
 
Posts
2,710
Likes
17,411
I personally am not too keen on having a hockey puck on my wrist. I guests if I were built like a T800 Terminator it could work.... Having said that if I were built like that I could probably get away with lots of things馃榾
 
Posts
2,152
Likes
3,810
I personally am not too keen on having a hockey puck on my wrist. I guests if I were built like a T800 Terminator it could work.... Having said that if I were built like that I could probably get away with lots of things馃榾

Fair enough...but...have you actually tried the new Speedy Racing on your wrist, or perhaps a DSOTM? I was surprised as to how small the DSOTM wore on the wrist.

Generally I think the consensus for larger watches is that if the lugs do not overhang and you are not using the watch with formal attire, you don't need to be Mr. T800 to pull off a +42mm watch

I think it is fun to have a bigger sports watch in your collection (e.g Panerai, 42mm Explorer 2, Pilot watch, 44.25mm Omega chronograph etc.). Some days you want to wear something elegant and classy like an Explorer or a Reverso, another day you might want to wear something bigger and sporty. I think the black and orange Speedy Racing looks like a great fun sports watch...a colorful sports car with a mean chronograph engine.馃槑

I am very much looking forward to trying on one as soon as I can馃榾
 
Posts
275
Likes
471
Fair enough...but...have you actually tried the new Speedy Racing on your wrist, or perhaps a DSOTM? I was surprised as to how small the DSOTM wore on the wrist.

Generally I think the consensus for larger watches is that if the lugs do not overhang and you are not using the watch with formal attire, you don't need to be Mr. T800 to pull off a +42mm watch

I think it is fun to have a bigger sports watch in your collection (e.g Panerai, 42mm Explorer 2, Pilot watch, 44.25mm Omega chronograph etc.). Some days you want to wear something elegant and classy like an Explorer or a Reverso, another day you might want to wear something bigger and sporty. I think the black and orange Speedy Racing looks like a great fun sports watch...a colorful sports car with a mean chronograph engine.馃槑

I am very much looking forward to trying on one as soon as I can馃榾

I'm not sure where the lugs overhanging the wrist thing came from. As mentioned, I have about 7" wrists, and a Sub or Moonwatch is about as big as I'd go, and neither get even close to the hanging over my wrist. It's mostly about bezel or dial size, to me.
 
Posts
2,152
Likes
3,810
I'm not sure where the lugs overhanging the wrist thing came from. As mentioned, I have about 7" wrists, and a Sub or Moonwatch is about as big as I'd go, and neither get even close to the hanging over my wrist. It's mostly about bezel or dial size, to me.

The "thing" came from profound statistical analysis and a widespread review of diverse forum threads on topics such as "is the watch too big for me", "I have small wrists, can I wear watch model XXXXXX from brand YYYYY" etc.馃榿 Often "hockey pucks" are mentioned as part of these discussions馃檮, especially in posts from North America (where the ice hockey force is strong).

Of course @Df13 you might personally prefer a smaller watch look and others will be happy with their lugs hanging from a precipice...but I am pretty sure that having the lugs positioned within the wrist and not overhanging is considered the benchmark limit for many....at least that's the impression I have had from reading several watch forums over the years.馃榾
Edited:
 
Posts
73
Likes
90
Everyone has different rules; in my book and on my wrist
<= 36 mm size : watch felony. Looks boyish
<= 38 mm size : watch mismeandor. Looks undersized and does not read modern.
-- 39 mm size : watch probation. Acceptable if a 40+ mm version of the model isn't available but not preferable especially if the dial has multiple complications or a chronograph

Therefore, I stick with 40 mm minimum and never exceed 45 mm.
Hockey puck/garbage pail land begins at >=46 mm; very few can pull it off, Russian billionaires excluded.
 
Posts
275
Likes
471
The "thing" came from profound statistical analysis and a widespread review of diverse forum threads on topics such as "is the watch too big for me", "I have small wrists, can I wear watch model XXXXXX from brand YYYYY" etc.馃榿 Often "hockey pucks" are mentioned as part of these discussions馃檮, especially in posts from North America (where the ice hockey force is strong).

Of course @Df13 you might personally prefer a smaller watch look and others will be happy with their lugs hanging from a precipice...but I am pretty sure that having the lugs positioned within the wrist and not overhanging is considered the benchmark limit for many....at least that's the impression I have had from reading several watch forums over the years.馃榾

I've of course read this for years, too, but I never understood it. I think it was born out of the questionable fashion trends of last decade, and I can't imagine wearing a watch that even gets close to that.
 
Posts
536
Likes
763
Well I have 8" wrist and still sold my 9300 because of its size. Yes the lugs are not overhanging but eventually I did not liked that the watch is occupying almost all wrist area.
I may buy it again when Omega will issue it in the classic 42mm size.
 
Posts
2,152
Likes
3,810
interesting...and I think the key point here is feel comfortable with whatever your personal tastes are...and don't judge too harshly those with different tastes from yours.馃榾
 
Posts
15
Likes
12
As far as the Speedmasters are concerned: I always had the impression that they wear a lot smaller than the measurements (42mm or 44,25 mm respectivley) suggest. A Rolex Explorer II wears much bigger than a Moonwatch for example, yet both watches are 42mm. I guess the reason is that the bezel of the Speedmasters is smaller than the case. Does anyone know the diameter of the bezels of the Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch and of the new CoAxial Speedmasters?

Maybe we need something like this for watches:

http://camerasize.com/compare/