New Release | Omega Speedmaster Pilot

Posts
1
Likes
2
What’s everyone’s thoughts.
40.85mm (D) x 14.7mm (T) x 49.6mm (LTL)
Features the calibre 9900
 
Posts
149
Likes
122
priced at 10 500 € here it s a lot, fortunatley at grey market already at 9.5
 
Posts
554
Likes
610
14.7mm thick? That watch needs to be 13.5 at most
When was the last time Omega produced a Speedmaster that thin?

The Professional Speedmaster with the PIC that starts with 311 is about 14mm. The newest version with the PIC that starts with 310 trimmed a few tenths off that but was still in the 13's. The 3570's were 14mm. The FOIS are 14mm.
 
Posts
2,390
Likes
2,512
When was the last time Omega produced a Speedmaster that thin?

The Professional Speedmaster with the PIC that starts with 311 is about 14mm. The newest version with the PIC that starts with 310 trimmed a few tenths off that but was still in the 13's. The 3570's were 14mm. The FOIS are 14mm.
The FOIS and current Moonwatch are pretty close to 13.5. 14.7 is too thick for 41mm.
 
Posts
2,627
Likes
4,941
When was the last time Omega produced a Speedmaster that thin?

The Professional Speedmaster with the PIC that starts with 311 is about 14mm. The newest version with the PIC that starts with 310 trimmed a few tenths off that but was still in the 13's. The 3570's were 14mm. The FOIS are 14mm.

310.30.42.50.01.001, the SS 3861, is 13.2mm. The hesalite 3861 is 13.6mm.

The prior gen SS (1863 movement) is 13.5mm.

The current 321 is 13.7mm and the current FOIS is 13.4mm. The '57 is 12.9mm.

There are many speedmasters that fall between 13 and 13 and-a-half mm roughly; but it is important to keep in mind that none of them have what is effectively a GMT feature on a sub dial.
 
Posts
181
Likes
341
Omega has been crushing it with the Speedmaster line this year. Even if every watch isn't your cup of tea, there's enough variety for everyone to find something cool or unique.

For this Flightmaster, definitely like the dial as it's something different and visually interesting. Might be a touch on the thick side but need to see it on the wrist before making that call. Would I pick this up as my first Speedie for a daily driver, no. Would I consider it for my fifth one, yes.
 
Posts
554
Likes
1,266
Omega has been crushing it with the Speedmaster line this year. Even if every watch isn't your cup of tea, there's enough variety for everyone to find something cool or unique.

For this Flightmaster, definitely like the dial as it's something different and visually interesting. Might be a touch on the thick side but need to see it on the wrist before making that call. Would I pick this up as my first Speedie for a daily driver, no. Would I consider it for my fifth one, yes.
It'll probably be my fifth one, unless I get an X33 instead next year. My OB says these will be in store by the end of this week. She didn't say how many they will get.
Edited:
 
Posts
9,597
Likes
15,153
310.30.42.50.01.001, the SS 3861, is 13.2mm. The hesalite 3861 is 13.6mm.

The prior gen SS (1863 movement) is 13.5mm.

The current 321 is 13.7mm and the current FOIS is 13.4mm. The '57 is 12.9mm.

There are many speedmasters that fall between 13 and 13 and-a-half mm roughly; but it is important to keep in mind that none of them have what is effectively a GMT feature on a sub dial.
Maybe I am missing your point but surely it is only a GMT feature if you set the chronograph running at exactly the right time and leave it running constantly. Not very practical and removes the watches main complication from use. Other than the colour scheme which is debatably more visible, I can't see that this release has anything more to offer a pilot than any other Speedmaster.
 
Posts
2,627
Likes
4,941
Maybe I am missing your point but surely it is only a GMT feature if you set the chronograph running at exactly the right time and leave it running constantly. Not very practical and removes the watches main complication from use. Other than the colour scheme which is debatably more visible, I can't see that this release has anything more to offer a pilot than any other Speedmaster.

Yeah, I slashed that text through because I read that it has a time zone function but I haven't really researched the watch enough to know how it works. This watch does also have a date function, something the Speedmaster professional does not, if it also has some sort of a time zone function it makes sense that it would be a bit thicker (to me). It also has slightly more water resistance than a standard speedy (which is nice, but doesn't make a lot of sense to me as a pilot's watch)

I do understand why some people think that this case is a bit too thick; I think as long as Omega can stick in the mid 13 range with their raised crystals thickness is fine.

Is this also an automatic?
 
Posts
106
Likes
342
I think the time zone function refers to the jumping hour hand, the SM300 has the time zone function listed under features as well.

And yes it is automatic.
 
Posts
9,597
Likes
15,153
I think the time zone function refers to the jumping hour hand, the SM300 has the time zone function listed under features as well.

And yes it is automatic.
Makes sense yes. Like the 8500 family (which this movement is I believe ultimately based on) and some of the quartz movements. Good for travel but not a GMT function as such.
 
Posts
2,627
Likes
4,941
@Fickle thank you for correcting my misunderstanding. So, it has a date function and is automatic, those two things make sense for a bit of added thickness.
 
Posts
9,597
Likes
15,153
@Fickle thank you for correcting my misunderstanding. So, it has a date function and is automatic, those two things make sense for a bit of added thickness.
Well not really. The 3313 movement Broad Arrow Speedies were auto with date at an all up thickness of the same 13.5mm as the Moonwatch. The fact remains the 9300/9900 is a bit of a fatty. The 8500s too in fact.
 
Posts
2,390
Likes
2,512
Makes sense yes. Like the 8500 family (which this movement is I believe ultimately based on) and some of the quartz movements. Good for travel but not a GMT function as such.
I thought the 8500 was phased out for the 8900. I think the 8900 is slightly thinner than the 8500 but someone with more knowledge on this can correct me.
 
Posts
2,627
Likes
4,941
Well not really. The 3313 movement Broad Arrow Speedies were auto with date at an all up thickness of the same 13.5mm as the Moonwatch. The fact remains the 9300/9900 is a bit of a fatty. The 8500s too in fact.

Feel like we have discussed this before, and I agree and acknowledge that the 33XX series is thinner, for what reason is Omega no longer using it or not as often?
 
Posts
2,127
Likes
2,415
Like the look of it, but also still jealous that the pilots only model has more subdued colors.