I’m impressed by the short turnaround time of the request - took only two days for the pdf to be available.
Result is a bit strange, though - I doubt that adding a photo provides a real value add: requested an EoA for a seamaster 176.007, did not put the full ref number to the request, but only „seamaster 176“, and added the photos of the 176.007 in question.
Received an EoA stating it should be a 176.001 - the ref featuring same dial/movement but no tachy-ring (delivered in 1973, which is pretty unusual, but this will go into a new thread).
I am positively surprised that the request did not get rejected, because should have been clearly visible from the photo that the movement is sitting in a different case ... maybe the two refs are just too close
Click to expand...