Need to know about my Railmaster

Posts
11,477
Likes
20,096
Wow. Absolute steal!

Sure there are some imperfections but you’ve paid 1/10 of the price!
 
Posts
60
Likes
33
Here is an original advertisement brochure from around 1959 that features the Railmaster.

rail.jpg
http://www.old-omegas.com/3high.html

gatorcpa
Thanks for sharing all these info I got this one https://www.watchprosite.com/omega/my-grail-master-has-landed/677.939463.6492913/ but I think its from 2nd series production
 
Posts
60
Likes
33
Wow. Absolute steal!

Sure there are some imperfections but you’ve paid 1/10 of the price!
😀
 
Posts
5,329
Likes
9,052
And now: with all the infos you have now, quickly sell it for $ 8000. Not the best market in the moment, but it will get worse.
 
Posts
2,286
Likes
19,729
If the watch doesn’t have an extract, you’re not getting one for a good long time.

I don’t think there is enough information here to make an assessment of this watch.

The picture of the caseback is very out of focus. I think it’s been polished so heavily that there are only traces left of the hippocampus.

Do you have pictures of the inside to ensure that the caseback has the correct markings, the movement caliber is correct, the case is intact and the dust cover is still present?

A Railmaster in slightly better condition was sold here not too long ago:

https://omegaforums.net/threads/omega-railmaster-135-004-63-with-extract.148845/

If all the pieces are there, it could be an incredible bargain. If not? 🙁

This is a classic collector’s conundrum.
gatorcpa


I should've written "assuming it's eventually confirmed by an extract." If it is, then the OP gets an attaboy for risk-taking. If it isn't confirmed by Omega's research department, then he got a fair deal and a Rail he can wear without feeling cheated by an unscrupulous seller.

Best,

Art
 
Posts
1,552
Likes
3,645
Amazing 🥰. What else to say?! Deal of the year if you ask me!
 
Posts
956
Likes
1,826
Quite disgusting actually, you knowing this watch is worth 5 or 10 times more you still had to rip off the extra 500 from the seller ?
 
Posts
60
Likes
33
Quite disgusting actually, you knowing this watch is worth 5 or 10 times more you still had to rip off the extra 500 from the seller ?
Please dont comment without knowing the whole story. The person I bought it from is a dealer, and he bought from a person who was going to through this watch out of the window, as it was sitting in his home forever without any use. My advantage was that I knew about the watch but the dealer didnt. Dealer was asking 1.5K should I pay him 10K? Possibly dealer got it for free!
 
Posts
956
Likes
1,826
I comment as i see fit, ... i hope karma will return this to you in the future.
 
Posts
60
Likes
33
I comment as i see fit, ... i hope karma will return this to you in the future.
God bless you...
 
Posts
348
Likes
710
Cool find.

Can you share a photo of the crown? Curious if it has the NIAD symbol.
 
Posts
5,856
Likes
16,758
I think it’s been polished so heavily that there are only traces left of the hippocampus.


Actually, The 2914-1 should be blank with no hippocampus. Many 2914-2 are blank as well.
 
Posts
5,856
Likes
16,758
As far as I know this is the first series of railmaster,

FYI, the 2914 is the 2nd series of Railmaster.
Reference 2777-2 is the first.
 
Posts
60
Likes
33
Cool find.

Can you share a photo of the crown? Curious if it has the NIAD symbol.
My Railmaster have replacement crown. However I know what do you mean. I have that type of crown in my another watch, which is rare too, but not so valuable. adding images
 
Posts
60
Likes
33
FYI, the 2914 is the 2nd series of Railmaster.
Reference 2777-2 is the first.
That was prototype I believe. According to omega site 2914 is the start of Railmaster. Also part of 1957 Trilogy. May be I am wrong.
 
Posts
5,856
Likes
16,758
That was prototype I believe. According to omega site 2914 is the start of Railmaster. Also part of 1957 Trilogy. May be I am wrong.

Depends on your definition of "prototype".😀

Edit: According to this definition, the Railmaster 2777-2 is NOT a prototype.

"a first, typical or preliminary model of something, especially a machine, from which other forms are developed or copied."
Edited:
 
Posts
60
Likes
33
Depends on your definition of "prototype".😀

Edit: According to this definition, the Railmaster 2777-2 is NOT a prototype.

"a first, typical or preliminary model of something, especially a machine, from which other forms are developed or copied."
I am not trying to prove my point though. This is what I found online and written other experts too. Check the image
 
Posts
5,856
Likes
16,758
Indeed, when I first acquired the black 2777-2 Railmaster in 2016, I invoked the P word. I was incorrect.

As others correctly pointed out, the 1955 2777-2 Railmaster should be considered more a bridge from the 1953 2777-1 RAF to the 1957 2914 Railmaster.
 
Posts
5,329
Likes
9,052
I am not trying to prove my point though. This is what I found online and written other experts too. Check the image

The Experts are here on this Forum. Science evolves. Knowledge as well. You show a Dealers sales ad. He is no expert. The White Dial shows " Railmaster " on the Dial. Printed in the Factory. Therefore it is one of the first Railmaster's . I know that well, because that was my Watch, forced to sell at Auction by Bonham's due to a court ordered divorce proceeding. Bought by that dealer and he sold it to the Omega museum , where it is on display now. Google is just a massive sorting machine for stuff, that somebody mentioned. Truth has nothing to do with Google. If you want to know facts, use Google Scholar.
 
Posts
60
Likes
33
The Experts are here on this Forum. Science evolves. Knowledge as well. You show a Dealers sales ad. He is no expert. The White Dial shows " Railmaster " on the Dial. Printed in the Factory. Therefore it is one of the first Railmaster's . I know that well, because that was my Watch, forced to sell at Auction by Bonham's due to a court ordered divorce proceeding. Bought by that dealer and he sold it to the Omega museum , where it is on display now. Google is just a massive sorting machine for stuff, that somebody mentioned. Truth has nothing to do with Google. If you want to know facts, use Google Scholar.
Two things go to omega site and read their article on railmaster. However I already posted that article above. Even though if you have doubt check yourself. Second there is a term called prototype, although company never mention that on the product but we know production version should be in large in number where as prototype should be in limited number and sometimes they differe in look and feel. You can find same thing with car industry as well, and many other industry too. I am not saying cal 283 railmaster was not railmaster but it can't be production version only because it was made around 20 in number. Thanks to @gemini4 for the post which I read few days ago only and came to know about 283 railmaster.