Community Stories

Need help. Advice on vintage speedy. My first watch. 145.022 69 pre moon

Barking mad
Posts
4,965
Likes
72,571
t_swiss_t ahantel
You guys are scaring me a bit too! I got this 105.012 and the bezel and 1506/16 bracelet/end-link are both, while not NOS, in pretty great shape. I might have to wear it with a strap and service bezel just to keep the value steady.
image.jpg
Buy yourself a couple of leather straps and a few more watches and then wear straps, bracelets and watches in rotation馃榾
 
t_swiss_t
Posts
603
Likes
2,567
Barking mad Barking mad
Buy yourself a couple of leather straps and a few more watches and then wear straps, bracelets and watches in rotation馃榾

Hah @Barking mad , tell that to the girl who's expecting my next purchase to be a ring...

And yes, I asked if she'd like a watch instead. Didn't go over well. 馃槦
 
sarir97
Posts
113
Likes
233
Noles_88 Noles_88
Hello everyone. Im new to the forum and currently looking to purchase my first watch as a graduation gift. Im interested in a pre moon speedy. I found a gentleman trying to sell me a 145.022 69. He says it is all original. I just wanted to know if it is all original. Any pros and cons. Also if the price is right which is currently standing at 5000 dollars. Thank you in advance for the help.

The price is right for a vintage watch in this pristine condition. However, be smart about it. Get yourself a <$1000 boutique beater for daily wear, and only wear this on weekends. If you insist on a Speedie for daily wear, get yourself a used modern version and be happy, and save yourself 2 grand.
 
Moonraker
Posts
10
Likes
17
Is a 1970 vintage 1039 bracelet correct for this, or should it be a 1969? My own opinion is that the correct date stamp on this 1969 watch is 70, not 69, but that opinion has been put in doubt today. What 1039 bracelet is correct on this particular watch? Thanks.
 
Davidt
Posts
12,145
Likes
21,080
Moonraker Moonraker
Is a 1970 vintage 1039 bracelet correct for this, or should it be a 1969? My own opinion is that the correct date stamp on this 1969 watch is 70, not 69, but that opinion has been put in doubt today. What 1039 bracelet is correct on this particular watch? Thanks.

You could get away with a 69, 70 or 71 braceket really. Given the choice, a 70 is probably most accurate.
 
Moonraker
Posts
10
Likes
17
Yup. That's what I thought. 70 is the one that would be considered "correct" and would have come with a 69 watch originally. A 1969 bracelet would be cool because that was the year of the moon landing, I get that, but it's a bit bogus, for appearance sake only. Am I wrong? I just want to be sure I'm not misinformed...
 
Davidt
Posts
12,145
Likes
21,080
I don't think it's inconceivable that some '69's made it to stores and were sold with 69 bracelets.

I don't think its a massive issue tbh. If you have a choice between all three dates, just pick the one on the best condition, Nevermind if it's 69/70/71. All are fine.
 
TNTwatch
Posts
2,876
Likes
1,959
Moonraker Moonraker
Yup. That's what I thought. 70 is the one that would be considered "correct" and would have come with a 69 watch originally. A 1969 bracelet would be cool because that was the year of the moon landing, I get that, but it's a bit bogus, for appearance sake only. Am I wrong? I just want to be sure I'm not misinformed...
The 69 speedy was produced from 69 to 71, so it's fine for it to have bracelet from 69 to 71. If you don't have the original bct with your watch and are picky about the bct's date stamp, you'd have to match it with the movement's serial number or the date the watched was produced based on archive extract.

PS: Since bct was available as a separate option, it could as well be dated a year or two after the watch was produced.
Edited:
 
Esmarch
Posts
95
Likes
133
Davidt Davidt3449
I don't think it's inconceivable that some '69's made it to stores and were sold with 69 bracelets..

My 145022-69ST with pre moon caseback (early 29mil serial) came with what appears to be an original 1116 bracelet.
 
alphasquare
Posts
38
Likes
27
My 145.022-69 2911xxxx also came with '69 1039 bracelet and DON bezel.
 
Nactex
Posts
338
Likes
265
I bought my 145.022-69 during the summer of 1970. I still have it and it has a '69 1039 and a 30,xxx,xxx serial.
 
Davidt
Posts
12,145
Likes
21,080
So a '69 bracelet is fine then.

To add to the thread, a '69 I used to own, with 2911xxxx serial, which came direct from the original owner, had a 1 70 bracelet.
 
Spacefruit
Posts
5,282
Likes
24,093
And it is a lovely watch.
Enjoy it.
I think it is what you want - a fine example of a speedmaster.
If you wear it, I doubt you will meet someone wearing a better condition 145.022.
I like that!
 
Noles_88
Posts
1,199
Likes
2,089
Spacefruit Spacefruit
And it is a lovely watch.
Enjoy it.
I think it is what you want - a fine example of a speedmaster.
If you wear it, I doubt you will meet someone wearing a better condition 145.022.
I like that!
Thank you sir.
 
Sign up or log in to reply...

Similar threads

WYO_Watch

Advice on Vintage Speedy Pre Moon?

WYO_Watch Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
WYO_Watch
WYO_Watch
Posts
77
Views
8K
Noles_88

Just bought my first watch. Pre moon speedy. Want to thank everyone here for the help

Noles_88 Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
Noles_88
Noles_88
Posts
24
Views
2K