Need a help confirming my new Omega HS-8

Posts
70
Likes
155
Hello,
I’m in the process of making an exchange and I need some confirmation about this Omega issued HS8.
I not the most knowledgeable on these so I looking for a little help. From the information I’ve gathered it seems OK , alloyed mid case ,
« Swiss » written dial , fixed lugs. The only doubt I have is I haven’t found any serial number on the lug or on the top cover of the case. Is this an absolute for an issued Omega HS8 ?
 
Posts
428
Likes
794
I'm not sure we can be very confident in discussing these watches today. Much has been lost with the passage of time. But, from my understanding:

1. Yes, an HS↑8 watch should have the last three digits of its issue number engraved in the lugs and under the bezel.
2. Also, it is my understanding that, unlike the RAF's 6B/159 watches, the RN HS↑8 watches had removable spring bars, not fixed bars.

From the excellent article on af0210strap.com:

A few Omega HS8 watches were also issued, perhaps several thousand, after the Cyma HS8 issue, in 1943. These had a plated brass case with shorter lugs, stainless steel case back, and spring bars.

More discussion here.

It's not clear if that's true for all of the HS↑8 watches or just some. I have seen several purported HS↑8 watches with fixed bars offered for sale.

FWIW, my own HS↑8 has spring bars.

The engravings are pretty small and the alloy is fragile, so it's worth looking very closely. But I agree that none are apparent on the photos you posted. Here's what mine looks like (lower right of photo).

Edited:
 
Posts
428
Likes
794
To be honest, I've sort of embraced the uncertainty. There are a few aspects of my own watch that could at least raise some eyebrows. What are the odds of a nice round issue number like "7800"? (I guess 1-in-100.) The caseback etching font seems to differ from any other example I've seen. And the dial fonts are also not quite identical. (MoD redial?)

I did request an Extract of the Archives for the watch from Omega and—to the extent that an EoA confirms anything—it at least confirms that the movement was part of a British wartime procurement. (The service should be available again, perhaps as soon as this summer.) But who knows if the case and/or dial are truly original?

I've concluded that it doesn't really matter. What I have is a bit of technology that, in its own small way, represents one of the most heroic endeavors in recent history: the preservation of democracy. Was it actually worn by a Royal Navy pilot on coastal patrol hunting for Axis submarines? Maybe, or maybe not. But those pilots wore watches like the one I have. And the fact that my watch still keeps perfect time today demonstrates how marvelous that technology was and is. Ultimately that's what makes me happy.
Edited:
 
Posts
70
Likes
155
Totally agree with you that’s why I’m going forward with the exchange.
I’ve seen and read so many times about watches that were controversial and as time passed , documents were found and confirmed hypotheses.
I love the brand, design and history.
Happy to have it in my collection.
 
Posts
5,270
Likes
8,979
All good. Yours will have very good original Dial and hands. And the rim in the middle case, that holds the back, seems basically undamaged from opening attempts with the wrong tool. Go for it. Any extra numbers on the case are definitely not a deal breaker. Some have, some have not. Just replace the blued case screw with a wider one; it barely reaches the middle case rim.