Canuck
·Or, if the date ring were to be exchanged with the result that the 8 is square in the window, I guarantee you with your eagle eye, you’ll find another number (or more) this isn't “perfect”.
Truth in advertising says Burger King and McDonald's must take their photos with the actual food items they sell to people ... they choose the absolute best items, at their peak of freshness, and aligned in such a way for the photo as to be closer to the front.
Now tell me if you've EVER gotten a burger that looks even remotely like their photos.
I won't wait.
Comparing food to a mechanical watch is ridiculous and If a burger cost $8,000 you better believe it better look like the advertising.
Truth in advertising says Burger King and McDonald's must take their photos with the actual food items they sell to people ... they choose the absolute best items, at their peak of freshness, and aligned in such a way for the photo as to be closer to the front.
Now tell me if you've EVER gotten a burger that looks even remotely like their photos.
I won't wait.
Keep in mind food advertising often uses non food items for their photos: glue instead of milk, engine oil instead of maple syrup etc.
Advertising rules are advertising rules, they apply the same to a $8 sandwich as they do to an $8000 watch or an $80000 car and you better believe they ALL skirt the letter of the law.
Dish soap instead of butter ...
I think they now have to use the actual items. So a lot is camera angles. They can also cut the stuff apart and move it around, So the meat patty looks thicker and wider.
The real question is do frozen meals ever look like the illustration on the cover. Will they every find a way to keep the Ice crystals from forming under the plastic wrap? And why is the center always still frozen?
Such pedantic attitude, is why I do not service watches for others. -- Curious I had loo look up the spelling on wiki.
Perhaps we should start using the work Didactic instead ...
I just can't see how advertising laws relative to food advertisements applies to watches made in Switzerland. What rule is Omega skirting concerning the off set date in the OP's post?
I'm simply relaying what Omega's tolerance is...
The thing they sell has to be in the photo, anything else can be fake. Best example is cereal. The cereal has to be real, the medium can be anything white.
Do you happen to know if this tolerance was set with the date window at 3?
The tolerance for vertical alignment with the date window at 3 o’clock is the the gap between the digit and the edge of the date window can be 1/3 on top/bottom and 2/3 on the opposite, and still be within tolerance.
If you were to apply this to the side to side alignment in your photo, I think it would be within tolerance.
And what do you call someone who is being mocked for excessive attention to detail by a community of pedants? 😁
Emphasis added by me.
So; Omega is shifting the date windows on many refs to 6 o'clock, but never re-set the tolerances. What I should really have said in my first post here was, "does Omega have specific tolerances for 6 o'clock, and if so, did they get carried over from the 3 o'clock date window position."
Seems to me OP could go at Omega - if they have no tolerance guidelines for 6 o'clock, that way. Or just argue that (if omega never updated them) that they should do that. may not move the needle, but you never know.