Warthog
·I'd say that is an increasingly problematic aspect of this thing of ours.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I'd say that is an increasingly problematic aspect of this thing of ours.
That's interesting. And why would that be?
Just because I have followed closely a certain brand /period of watches?
Isn't that true of a number of people here? Or do men enjoy certain privileges which women should not?
What is the sin here? Is the dial correct in its current case?
He's not talking about watches. He means that your spouse probably can't get away with anything due to your detective skills.
I think that is the whole debate. It was perfect in a 32mm case, and while it looks nice in the 35mm tre tacche it does appear small for it to my eyes (look at the wide white space between the track and bezel) and certainly not one of the dial designs usually seen on those watches.
Of course as said Longines has made many dials, and just because something is not standard does not mean it’s incorrect. However, and given the fact it’s not a standard tre tacche dial and the sizing issue, I too find the lack of disclosure a problem.
I understood that, and I had a private discussion with a member about it. Both he and I could see the picture of the proverbial shrew with a rolling pin chasing after the tell tale clues of infidelity.
So I have to ask: would @Bumper have thought or said the same thing of a man posting the same thing?
I must admit I have no sense of humor with jokes hinting that women with brains must be scary/ pains in the arse/ unworthy of companionship. I’ve seen some of those jokes elsewhere and maybe it has tainted my reaction here.
However I don’t recall anyone making similar jokes about all of the male horology enthusiasts here who are detail oriented, and cannot back down from any argument. It’ll be interesting next time I post “boy, if I were your spouse I’d be quivering in my shoes”. Or “boy your spouse must be a saint”.
Respectfully, I would like to state that I have never represented the black dial as being original to the watch. To be clear, I do not believe this black dial is original to this watch. Indeed all other MN Longines examples have white dials.
I purchased this watch with its black dial already in place, I still own this piece and it is not for sale. I have since sent the piece to Longines asking specifically for comment on the dial, and obtained a certificate of authenticity that was inconclusive on the dial (it only mentioned the dial as being brass, though I've seen other certificates confirming a white dial). Accordingly I do not have any information confirming the black dial as original, and therefore I would not represent it as original.
If you’re selling a watch for $3000 and you don’t believe the dial to be original, then shouldn’t you disclose that ? Or is it just buyer-beware ?
Then reappears in a norwegian collection. Now with a well used but authentic
Stern dial and blued leaf hands......