Lets See Your Favorite Watch Of Your Collection And Why!

Posts
4,043
Likes
13,944
NOS Technos Sky Diver 500m. With the gilt dial, killer patina, big crown, and overall design and uniqueness, it wins hands down.
 
Posts
17,419
Likes
164,517
I couldn't say it was my favourite but it has so much history that if ever push came to shove and I could only keep one it would be this, owned from new. Slight problem in that it sits almost permanently on my dearly beloveds wrist 馃

 
Posts
514
Likes
560
If I could only keep one one watch, and I have a good selection, it would be my Seiko Quartz Chronograph that I purchased new for 拢200 thirty years ago. I just love the look of it, and it's timekeeping is exceptional. What impresses me most is it has run non stop without servicing for all these years, except when I changed batteries.

 
Posts
522
Likes
500
I am not able to decide. With a gun to my head I would say my Ed white..

now that's my kind of collection! i second that
 
Posts
3,817
Likes
16,152
I LIKE it. Details please! Movement pictures, please.

1948ish Ball 999B, based on a modified Hamilton 992B movement. Cased in Canada by the Canadian Ball importer

 
Posts
4,512
Likes
9,329
Hi

Here is a 200m Sky Diver day date

NOS Technos Sky Diver 500m. With the gilt dial, killer patina, big crown, and overall design and uniqueness, it wins hands down.
 
Posts
347
Likes
2,336


Today I'll claim its this one. I take no responsibility if it changes tomorrow.
 
Posts
514
Likes
560
Does it matter? (hint: there's more)


The thread is about your favourite watch, and this is undoubtably a hard decision. So which "ONE" is yours?
 
Posts
2,239
Likes
32,565
My 1969 Hamilton Chrono-Matic ranks right up there. The Panda dial is the perfect balance of black & white. Lovely match-stick hands, and of course the famous Cal.11 movement with left crown. Love that the movement was co-developed between Heuer, Breitling, Hamilton and Dubois-Depraz in a partnership to create the first automatic chronograph movement, which in fact was launched in March 1969 with press conferences in Geneva and NYC.
Hamilton%20Wrist%20-%203_zpsxh8ubrjg.jpg
IMG_7572_zps36fb7b33.jpg
Hamilton%20Ad_zpsgj72sfvc.jpg
 
Posts
2,553
Likes
3,662
Here's mine, circa 1905 Ball Waltham, model 1899 with an incorrect dial.

but my favorite is this circa 1950 Hamilton 4992B
 
Posts
3,801
Likes
22,736
NOS Technos Sky Diver 500m. With the gilt dial, killer patina, big crown, and overall design and uniqueness, it wins hands down.
Given the company that watch is in it says a lot about how you feel about it. Distinctive indeed!
 
Posts
3,801
Likes
22,736
One huh? It has to be 2...

The Geometer appeals to me in every way. It's nebulous history pre-dating the Speedmaster, the perfect size (for me)at 38mm and that combination of lucious chocolaty dial, sword hands and killer patina..The adjusted V-72 is just the icing on the cake.



But I think this one has an edge...I literally stumbled onto this one last year. It had just popped up on a sales forum at a price I thought was too good to be true but it was sold by a regular seller. My heart sank when the seller told me it had found a new hom but he gave me first dibs if the sale fell through. Lo and behold, two hours later it was mine!
I love this one especially for it's amazing dial and hefty size. The link to Jim Clark is also quite appealing. And again, an adjusted V-72 under the hood. That reverse Panda dial killls me everytime I look at it.

Edited:
 
Posts
5,302
Likes
24,256
For so many reasons, this 105.012-63.

First the 105.012 is a fascinating reference to a Speedmaster nerd like me as it was the only confirmed Omega on the moon.

The -63 is interesting as it often came with a SWISS MADE dial with no T's as this one.

The 105.012 is the first Asymmetric case, and the first Professional marked dial.

This particular one came on an ebay sale - I wish I had kept the listing. Poor three photos of a speedmaster, and described as a 1970's omega. No movement pictures, no pictures of the rear, and a 1171 bracelet. It was from the owners family.

I paid 1370 sterling for it and was shocked to see a 321 sitting in it. I knew very little at the time, but I knew it was not from 1970's. It was one of the first watches STS serviced for me and it has been wonderful since.

For me the dial, handset and bezel have all aged contemporaneously and attractively.

The dial is correct, with a high SWISS MADE, AML and Professional marking. The lume is present, and slightly degraded. The body of the dial is solid, very slightly faded, and undamaged. All the printing is complete and undamaged.

The hands look original to the watch, showing gentle degradation and patina that fits with the rest of the watch. They are correct for the reference.

The bezel also fits with the rest of the condition, and faded to an attractive grey - we have to be careful with all the so-called ghost bezels that are unattractive, or even bleached.

The case is sound, clean and only sightly polished.

In summary it is not NOS, it is not even what many might consider a fine example - the bezel is faded, the hands are degraded, the lume is not full - but I do believe it is original, and gently patinated.

It is the watch I reach for instinctively when I let my eye wander through my box, looking for the most pleasing example.

 
Posts
4,043
Likes
13,944
Given the company that watch is in it says a lot about how you feel about it. Distinctive indeed!
What is funny is that anytime I have it out with my other watches, collectors go straight for the Technos, past everything else. When I post pics of it, I get emails from people wanting to buy it. It is crazy, as no other watch I have owned has commanded so much attention.

Goes to show that a watch's true value stretches way beyond a monetary valuation.
 
Posts
3,801
Likes
22,736
What is funny is that anytime I have it out with my other watches, collectors go straight for the Technos, past everything else. When I post pics of it, I get emails from people wanting to buy it. It is crazy, as no other watch I have owned has commanded so much attention.

Goes to show that a watch's true value stretches way beyond a monetary valuation.

Well said!
 
Posts
913
Likes
8,049
For so many reasons, this 105.012-63.

First the 105.012 is a fascinating reference to a Speedmaster nerd like me as it was the only confirmed Omega on the moon.

...

It is the watch I reach for instinctively when I let my eye wander through my box, looking for the most pleasing example.


With all your expertise, I really appreciate seeing your favorite and hearing the story of why it's your favorite.
Thanks!