Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Your name is on the ‘certificate’….
Looks beautiful
I was thinking similar but if OP really likes the watch and didn’t pay too much I guess that’s cool. I was curious about the auction “authenticity” thing but I guess nothing on it directly implies Font is original and I’m no expert anyway.uy
MOY is not very convincing
MOY? Could you please explain the abriviation.
https://download1322.mediafire.com/.../yw5mwzezzdq/MOY+and+Omega+Constellations.pdf
FWIW, there is a picture of a dial from a Ref. 2652 on the first page of the above article. The crossing of the “t”’s of Constellation is identical to OP’s dial. I think it’s good.
gatorcpa
Hi. I checked with a leading enthusiast on the watch in the early 1950s, called Desmond. he has http://omega-constellation-collectors.blogspot.com/
He wrote me after looking at a bunch of close ups:
Greetings Patrick,
I think it’s a good, honest 2652. Lovely original dial with even patina. Still good definition in the lugs. These flatter bezelled models do tend to wear, and while the bezel shows signs of a lot of wrist time, I can still see the chamfer. Movement looks very clean and has all of its signature parts.
I would polish the crystal, but only use a jewellers cloth on the case.
The watch has excellent character and I suspect will look fantastic on the wrist. Congratulations on your acquisition
Regards