I've gone to the dark side...

Posts
4,421
Likes
22,830
BTW that would be my birth year Rolex as well. I do have to say after wearing my new Explorer II for a few days, it is a great watch, definitely one I’ll be keeping and passing down in fifty years time. There is something to the hype. The Explorer II is also very tool watch like, thus avoiding the pretentiousness of status only Rolex buyers.

Yeah my father in law has the same one you have.
That is what made me start looking at them, and I agree with your perception of them.
I think that is why it appeals to me.
I really have no interest in a Sub...
 
Posts
942
Likes
15,372
Yeah my father in law has the same one you have.
That is what made me start looking at them, and I agree with your perception of them.
I think that is why it appeals to me.
I really have no interest in a Sub...

Now that I have one, I could see a no date sub one day... or an explorer I or a gmt coke bezel...
 
Posts
4,652
Likes
64,944
Does owning more than one Rolex make me a bigger Asshole than your average one Rolex only Asshole , I'd like to think so 😀
 
Posts
58
Likes
116
i've personally never once cared what other people think about my watches and assume 99.9% of the people out there don't notice or care.
 
Posts
319
Likes
1,401
i've personally never once cared what other people think about my watches and assume 99.9% of the people out there don't notice or care.
Totally agree. 9/10 of my co workers have no clue about these old mechanical watches. The more unnoticeable the better to enjoy in my opinion.
 
Posts
7
Likes
4
What KTW said. I still believe there are two types of people in the world, Omega people and Rolex people. Owning both I now believe they are two sides of the same coin.
 
Posts
1,706
Likes
5,683
No, you’ve gone to the light. Wearing a great watch is heavenly, and Rolex has made many many great watches over the years. Enjoy!
 
Posts
2,808
Likes
8,338
BTW that would be my birth year Rolex as well. I do have to say after wearing my new Explorer II for a few days, it is a great watch, definitely one I’ll be keeping and passing down in fifty years time. There is something to the hype. The Explorer II is also very tool watch like, thus avoiding the pretentiousness of status only Rolex buyers.

I can't afford my birth year Rolex because I'm soooo old.
 
Posts
1,440
Likes
3,772
I love my explorer 2. I think it is one of the Rolex watches that doesn't scream : " HEEEEY LOOK AT MY WRIST, ROLEX IS HERE". I used to have an AirKing with roman dial, but 36mm feels too small for me.
P.S. Congratulation on the new addition!
 
Posts
396
Likes
1,540
My second Rolex but the first was a Datejust and definitely to small for me. This will be in the collection for the long haul.

 
Posts
534
Likes
2,493
I never even tried on a Rolex until I inherited one from my wife's late uncle (a 1990s Datejust 16233). I got kind of suckered in by the solid quality - everything just works (unlike some other vintage watches I could name). I'll admit that I don't see the appeal of the GMT or Submariner, since I'm the kind of person that wants to wear a tool watch all the time without freaking out about bonking it on something. I've since acquired a couple Omegas which I love, but my eyes are starting to turn to the Explorer I, which I really like for its understatement. If I could find a 1016 with a slight patina I'd be content...
 
Posts
65
Likes
37
Does owning more than one Rolex make me a bigger Asshole than your average one Rolex only Asshole , I'd like to think so 😀

Nah, the blue Tudor cancels everything out. Ultimate coolness there 👍
 
Posts
42
Likes
39
I've despised Rolex as a brand for a long time for a number of reasons. Among those reasons is the rep Rolex owners get for being assholes. Not trying to offend anyone here, it's just a we'll know fact. Most of their so called icon designs have never appealed to me: Daytona, Submariner or the clicops Datejust. Their fluted bezels and jubilee bracelets are just awful imo. Specially the classic gold version. Omega on the other hand had always appealed to me since I was a teenager, starting with the Seamaster, in part thanks to our favorite secret agent.

Last year about the time I got my Speedmaster my wife bought a Rolex Oyster Perpetual. I was genuinely impressed. Apart from their logo(dial and buckle) everything seems really well designed. Simple. Elegant. Functional. Slowly I warmed my self up to various Rolex models. Still tied to my old misconceptions about the brand, I kept up with their news and releases.

Finally, the Explorer 1 caught my eyes a few months ago. I read about its history, different models, evolution, etc. I was intrigued. Less than a week ago I was finally able to wear one. There were many things I did not expect. Like the decreasing width of the bracelet as it reaches the buckle. A lot more noticeable difference from the Speedmaster and Aquaterra I've been wearing. I almost bought the watch, but didn't at the last minute. Something felt strange while wearing it.

After more research and visiting other ADs to look at other watches I've been stalking I decided get it. Looked at a few JLC, IWC, Nomos and a Bremont. One key thing that attracted me to this one was it's simple yet elegant black dial. I was hoping Omega release an update Railmaster with a flat black dial and elegant markets but that didn't happen. They went with the denim version and more textured dials similar to the Aquaterras on the new Seamasters. Here's my short list of requirements for this watch:

- 20 mm lug width
- 39-41 mm case
- Brushed steel bracelet
- Flat black dial
- I wanted all Arabic numerals, but just the ones in there were good enough.
- No other color accents on the watch: hands, letters, logo, etc.

The Rolex Explorer 1 met those requirements. It's a no frills solid tool watch. Built to last.

Finally yesterday I bought the watch in between meetings. At the end of my first meeting the person I was meeting with complimented it and asked me about it since he wasn't sure about getting the 1 or 2, since he wanted the date and GMT.

I've been wearing it for about 24 hours and so far surprised with how it feels. Love the microadjusting clasp doesn't require a tool. The bracelet is brushed and low key - even though it's easily recognized as an Oyster bracelet.

With this purchase I've effectively moved to the "dark side", something I swore never to do. My only remaining issues is feeling comfortable wearing a Rolex without feeling like and asshole, something I've never felt while wearing an Omega watch. I have been a bit self conscious about it and sort of hide it when talking to people. I hope this subsides or might be my first sale after hitting 200 here 😉

(Pic is supposed to be dark, cause it's the dark side)



Will try to post better ones tomorrow.

Coincidentally, when I started collecting watches about 20 years ago I also vowed never to have a Rolex, because of all the reasons you mention and the fact that they are so obvious.....and as with yourself, that all changed...
I have owned just about all of the sports models at one time or another, except for a Yachtmaster for some reason.
I have owned many other brands , but find Rolex are the easiest to sell when I fancy something different and they have always risen in value enough to cover the selling fees.
I have owned three Explorers and attach a shot of one of them....why did I ever sell that beauty!?
 
Posts
836
Likes
2,462
My brother is the Rolex guy.

I’m the omega guy.

He promised me he will take me into “the dark side” and will buy me a Rolex soon!

I’ll keep you posted...
 
Posts
836
Likes
2,462
I think the word 'Brand' is a clue to some of the negative feelings Rolex and Ferrari elicit.

People seem to but into 'Brands' these days but it was not always like this.

The last two watches I bought were both vintage Rolex models. I had resisted buying them for many years as I didn't like the modern Rolex 'Brand' associations. In the end I realised my negative viewpoint was stopping me owning two rather nice watches and I capitulated.

I still don't like the whole current Rolex marketing strategy but hey each to their own.

Moving on to Ferrari's.................I did once own one and can 100% hand on heart say I didn't buy it to show off.

It was their racing pedigree and history that attracted me plus they have made some of the most beautiful cars ever produced.

The Daytona is still my all time favourite but I couldn't afford the £20,000 they were at the time (mid 1980s) so I bought this which I had lusted after for many years..................



Marvelous car!
 
Posts
42
Likes
39
When I started with collecting omega's I thought I would never buy a rolex. What was the expression? You buy a rolex to impress your car salesman, you buy a IWC to impress your watchmaker.. anyway, things changed and my personal interest shifted (a bit) to other watch brands. Eventually two months ago I bought a two liner sub. It will be the only rolex I buy. In my eyes a iconic dive watch which would be a good addition to my (or any) collection. Now I'm looking for a zodiac sea wolf and maybe someday a blancpain. I'm not a flashy guy. I drive a volvo with bars for the dog and a baby sticker on the window. The sub is something for me. Nobody else. And nobody ever asked me about the sub. They dont see it. Maybe because I walk around on slippers.

I thought about buying a Blancpain Fifty Fathoms, but decided to try a tribute to see if I liked the feel of it.
This became a project watch to which I upgraded the movement to a Seagull which keeps time within a couple of seconds a day.
I then decided it just looked too new so aged it artificially as per the attached....not everyone's cup of tea!
 
Posts
42
Likes
39
I like Rolex watches and I don t really care what it is or is not supposed to say about me.Don t let others define you, wear what ever watch you want.
I would like to own a grape dial oyster perpetual and maybe a GMT when all the fuss dies down and they are easily accessible. (GMT, not the grape oyster, I think that one is an aquired taste that will be easy to get) I only have one Rolex and I like it for its simple design.

That's a beauty, so simple and I have to admit I prefer them without a date, even though I've had lots of Oysterdates - the attached one was my 1954 birth year with date, but no cyclops thing. I owned that one for about 15 years and found I wasn't wearing it much, so sadly it had to go, but it did triple in value, so not all bad!
 
Posts
17
Likes
10
For my first foray to the dark side, I went as modern as it gets, and stealthy.



FWIW, that's a cell phone wide-angle lens view. It doesn't look anywhere near that big in reality. So far I love it. The only downside (seeing as this is the Omega Forum), is that I probably need to sell a watch to justify it, and that watch is likely a FOIS.