Farmer
·I own this model. Something about this one does not look right, need much better pictures to be sure.
I own this model. Something about this one does not look right, need much better pictures to be sure.
Thank you for the response! Unfortunately all the pictures are low quality on this one, but I have attached the others available.
It has nothing to do with image interpolation. No amount of image stretching can account for this. It is 100% fake as stated. The fake producers haven't been able to make one with the correct spacing of the subdials as of yet.
Hello,
I just want to get some information as to the authenticity of my newly acquired Omega.
Thanks
Nothing jumps out at me as being wrong. It Could end up being a good purchase for you if it stays low, assuming you want it. Just be aware these are quite large on the wrist
Thanks - I've always quite liked the idea of having one, but not at the price point. I might stick a bid in at the opening bid and see what happens. If they are right that the papers with it are from 2016, it's still in warranty, although I'm not basing anything on that.
W WarmondDear all,
I just saw this Seamaster on Ebay and I find it nice at first sight, in particular the color of the dial.
Can you detect anything fundamentally wrong in this watch (non-legit, redial, etc)?
Minimum bid: 450 dollar.
This is the seller’s description:
“General: Excellent general conditions.
Dial: Original, in perfect condition, gold color.
Case: Gold Plated and Stainless Steel 35mm (Without crown)
Original crown marked Omega.
Cap: Screw type with "Seamaster" emblem engraved in the center in high relief.
Movement: In immaculate condition, original, Cal 1012 - 23 Jewels - Automatic
Bracelet: Supplied with 2 bands:
1: Original Omega bracelet, gold plated, diameter: 21 cm“
Thanks in advance for your input!
Google Seamaster 14763 which is what is marked inside the case back and you will not find this watch, so at the very least the case back is incorrect.