Forums Latest Members

Is this watch real or fake thread - aka Fake Busters!!

  1. McJamesT May 3, 2017

    Posts
    229
    Likes
    141
  2. WurstEver May 4, 2017

    Posts
    436
    Likes
    1,587
  3. shutterlife May 4, 2017

    Posts
    450
    Likes
    572
  4. WurstEver May 4, 2017

    Posts
    436
    Likes
    1,587
    So, I'm happy to be corrected, but I'm not aware of any variant of the 145.022 that carries an applied logo on a no-step dial, with long indices, but without the "professional" designation. Also, the Speedmaster text looks off and the hour and minute hands look wrong - check out those stumpy little short lume tracks. Weird. Maybe it's not literally "all" wrong. But something seems off here
     
  5. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. May 4, 2017

    Posts
    17,104
    Likes
    25,348
    There is something very fishy about that watch. Your observations are correct. The movement would give more clues. But that appears to be a modern 321 service dial. A 321 dial can be modded to fit an 861 movement. My gut is all new service parts and an unknown movement. It could be a legit Omega 321 or 861, or a tissot or ??? from another non Omega watch that used the same movement.

    If it has a full Omega movement and it's all service parts, it's described correctly. It is also currently over priced at a buy it now of $4100 usd.
     
    WurstEver likes this.
  6. incursore61 May 10, 2017

    Posts
    72
    Likes
    35
    ::facepalm1::
     
  7. fflump May 16, 2017

    Posts
    22
    Likes
    18
    Hi-I've been offered this PO for sale with SS bracelet and black rubber.
    Its a good price I was wondering if this looks genuine or anything amiss? 1.jpg image.png.jpeg 2.jpg 3.jpg
     
  8. redpcar May 16, 2017

    Posts
    3,696
    Likes
    7,905
    Box? Papers?
    Pic of the back?
    You know the seller?
     
    BrianMcKay likes this.
  9. fflump May 16, 2017

    Posts
    22
    Likes
    18
    Thanks-I've asked for those things-was wondering if there were obvious tells on the front pics he gave me..
     
  10. redpcar May 16, 2017

    Posts
    3,696
    Likes
    7,905
    If you could find out the exact model, compare it to known good models. I'm not an expert on the newer coaxial models but a few known red flags are trim around the date window and the helium valve location. It should be higher than 10:00 on the case rather than lower.
    This model is heavily faked. A newish Omega like this would likely have the box and papers. Without papers? :cautious:
     
  11. redpcar May 16, 2017

    Posts
    3,696
    Likes
    7,905
    Pulled a pic from the web. Just note a few minor differences. Date window on the web pic is beveled and the seconds markers extend taller than yours. A pic of the back would make things easier.
    Omega-Seamaster-Planet-Ocean-Co-Axial-Chronometer-26 (2).jpg
     
  12. michael22 May 16, 2017

    Posts
    1,790
    Likes
    1,897
  13. chanbar May 16, 2017

    Posts
    367
    Likes
    1,101
    Not sure about the PO, but I know the SMP is rounded corners at the date window for the newer versions. Is there a serial number at the lug behind the 7 position that matches the card?
     
  14. chickenman26 May 16, 2017

    Posts
    344
    Likes
    227
    You haven't stated what model it is, and features do change from year to year. If it came on a bracelet, I believe the reference is 232.30.42.21.01.001. Comparing your watch with a big blowup of the reference on Authentic Watches, they appear identical, including all points of contention mentioned here so far. But, you still need close pics of the back, and seeing the movement without the caseback wouldn't hurt, either. I agree with redpcar that a watch this new would likely have a box and some sort of written authenticity document. Buy the seller. Is it a well known seller, or just some guy from The Hood? I think I'd ask him to accompany me to an AD to have it verified, and walk away if he squirms.
     
    Edited May 16, 2017
    BrianMcKay likes this.
  15. chanbar May 16, 2017

    Posts
    367
    Likes
    1,101
    Hahaha, just some guy from the hood!
     
  16. BondJamesBond007 May 20, 2017

    Posts
    17
    Likes
    3
    I agree with the above comments and in my opinion, the box and papers (i.e the red chronometer card, reference card etc) are as important as the watch. Call me "Mr Suspicious" but there is NO WAY anyone would dispose of the box and papers after spending £000's on an Omega, or another luxury watch for that matter. No box/papers then I would walk away....if your heart is set on it or if it's too cheap to miss, then you must take it to a AD and get them to verify the movement. Good luck.
     
  17. Sidney Carton May 21, 2017

    Posts
    20
    Likes
    2
    I concur. The box and papers help a lot with sight unseen assessments.
     
  18. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado May 21, 2017

    Posts
    12,619
    Likes
    29,918
    Box and papers are way easier to fake and are no guarantee of getting a genuine watch.

    Buy the seller not the watch.
     
    dennisthemenace and BrianMcKay like this.
  19. Sidney Carton May 21, 2017

    Posts
    20
    Likes
    2
    My point was that the absence of papers and the like is suspicious. True, everything can be faked.
     
    BrianMcKay likes this.
  20. sundaydriver May 21, 2017

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    Hi, I'm new on this forum and wanted you guys to look at this Speedy Panda I'm thinking of buying. I own an Omega Seamaster and Im looking to add this watch. I just don't know if it's legit. I did ask about the papers and box. The seller thinks that the box is original to the watch but there are no cards. Could you guys have a look and let me know if you see anything unusual. Thanks.

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/382013104979?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:ITPurchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network