Is this Tri-Compax a good buy?

Posts
37
Likes
56
Hi everyone,

I am looking to get into vintage watches and I've set my sights on a particular Tri-Compax.

It is from a dealer I consider very reputable but I don't have enough background knowledge to know if it is a good buy and what I should be paying for it.

I am hoping that people on this forum can fill in the gaps for me:
What is this watch worth?
Do the dial, hands, and rest of the watch look original?
Is there anything I should know before pulling the trigger?

I don't want to say what it costs yet because I don't want to bias anyone's estimates.

 
Posts
13,019
Likes
51,952
I’m missing the moon. Should have a face but I’m betting on a service disc. Right away, this dealer is hiding his cards. Not that a service disc is a bad thing. That dial is in the right S/N range. Does it match the factory pic? No but it’s very close. Nice piece. As far as valuation, that’s between you and the dealer.
 
Posts
37
Likes
56
I’m missing the moon. Should have a face but I’m betting on a service disc. Right away, this dealer is hiding his cards. Not that a service disc is a bad thing. That dial is in the right S/N range. Does it match the factory pic? No but it’s very close. Nice piece. As far as valuation, that’s between you and the dealer.

Hey Larry, thanks so much for your input. A few more questions that will reveal my lack of knowledge here:
Is a service disk a replacement disk from a later period?
Is it an issue that the dial does not match the factory pic? Also how were you able to figure that out?
 
Posts
13,019
Likes
51,952
The original moon face discs did not age well. It was common to replace them with gold on blue starred background starting in the 50’s. So its not a big issue but I don’t like the fact that the dealer is hiding it. I’d ask to see the moon disc.

Sala …AKA “the bible”, has Black and White factory reference pictures. Like the bible however, it is subject to interpretation. This dial is in the right serial number zone.
 
Posts
13,019
Likes
51,952
As you can see, you need to think directionally with UG. The color plates have issues. The BW factory plates are a snapshot in time. Dealers were allowed to swap dials etc so overall nice watch.
 
Posts
1,923
Likes
3,530
The original moon face discs did not age well. It was common to replace them with gold on blue starred background starting in the 50’s.

what did the original discs look like? Thanks
 
Posts
13,019
Likes
51,952
what did the original discs look like? Thanks
See color pic
 
Posts
7,413
Likes
34,212

Where can I find this book and how much should I expect to pay? I don't collect UG but I'd like to educate myself and this book seems like a must.
 
Posts
13,019
Likes
51,952
@banders …Really need movement, moon, inside case back pics.
 
Posts
5,521
Likes
8,608
You may borrow mine 😉
 
Posts
1,161
Likes
6,803
If it’s a redial, it’s a good one. The Moonphase should look like the one in my avatar. The only things that worry me is the lack of a ring around the date register, and I would have thought it likely that the ‘31’ would be in red…
 
Posts
1,167
Likes
4,181
That dial is in the right S/N range. Does it match the factory pic? No but it’s very close.
what did the original discs look like? Thanks
Reference numbers only refer to the cases, not the dial. There are usually innumerable dial variants in one case.

The only things that worry me is the lack of a ring around the date register, and I would have thought it likely that the ‘31’ would be in red…
The one that @Mark020 postet first (Antiquorum) also does not have that ring. However, I agree that it looks suspicious and I always avoided them. I believe that these are service dials. Both watches have a dial without ring, with black 31 and a faceless moon but the serial is from 1943 to 1945. So at least, the moon disc was changed.
 
Posts
1,167
Likes
4,181
By the way, has anybody noticed the double reference and serial number at the top and bottom of the case back?