Is this Pie Pan 168.006 worth it ?

Posts
33
Likes
7
Hello,

I am currently in Japan and looking for a Constellation pie pan.

I came across this one on Sweetroad’s website (I haven’t seen it in person yet).
What do you think about its authenticity and overall appearance?

They list it as reference 168.006 : does this reference actually exist? I thought pie pan Constellations were usually 168.005.

I’m also a bit surprised by the crown, which looks fluted rather than decagonal. Is this normal? Do you see any other potential red flags?

Finally, the seller is Sweetroad : does anyone have experience with them? I’ve seen mixed reviews online.

That said, I could get the watch for around €1300–1400, which seems like a very good price for this model, especially from a professional dealer compared to current market prices.

Thanks in advance for your feedback!

Here is the listing : https://www.sweetroad.com/view/item...pHlC81hheBDj4sryvfQEEyYsqJAwlNdgaAmEXEALw_wcB

And some pictures from the website :

 
Posts
6,304
Likes
9,741
The watch is a 168.065.
Early / mid 70s dogleg produced for the far east market.
Mainly found in Japan.
 
Posts
6,304
Likes
9,741
not pristine but not too bad either.
These watches often attract a premium for (some unknown reason)
If you really can get it for $1300 I think you’d be getting a pretty good deal.
 
Posts
33
Likes
7
Thank you for your reply.

How big of a red flag is it if the seller doesn’t list the correct reference for the watch...?

Also it would be 1300 € but rather around 1600 $>

The watch does have some scratches, but I don’t mind some wear, and at least it doesn’t seem overpolished

Do the dial, movement, and crown look correct to you?

Thanks!
 
Posts
33
Likes
7
EDIT : MY BAD ! it was listed as 168.0065. A line break made me misread.
 
Posts
6,304
Likes
9,741
Not a red flag as the correct reference is shown on the case back.
The image of the movt is good enough to assess the movt.
Crown is correct for this model.

Some signs of rotor rub - so will require a service.

You should read Desmond’s essay on ‘the last pie pan’

BTW a 168.006 is a deluxe version of the 168.005 (gold case and gold dial)
 
Posts
33
Likes
7
Not a red flag as the correct reference is shown on the case back.
The image of the movt is good enough to assess the movt.
Crown is correct for this model.

Some signs of rotor rub - so will require a service.

You should read Desmond’s essay on ‘the last pie pan’

BTW a 168.006 is a deluxe version of the 168.005 (gold case and gold dial)
You mention rotor rub when they say the watch has been overhauled. Is that a red flag? Is it okay to use the watch like this a few years ? (without other problems occuring). I'm taking into account in my budget a watch that does not need to be serviced quickly.

For the reference yes I made researches in between and that's what I found, actually I stumbled on some of your messages by doing so 😀
 
Posts
6,304
Likes
9,741
If the watch has been properly serviced and the rotor issue resolved ( specifically ask them) then it should be okay but you should require proof of service as dealers can be economical with the truth.
 
Posts
33
Likes
7
I will ask them about this. Please can you tell me how you identified the rotor rub ?

Is this something in the movement that has been "rubbed" , meaning that the rotor was in friction ?

Or you can see on the picture that the rotor is still misaligned ?

Sorry I don't know if I'm being clear.

If the seller cannot give me solid proof, I don't know if I could pass on it, cause it is still a very good price
 
Posts
6,304
Likes
9,741
these are signs of rotor rub - the black curved marks


and you can possibly see corresponding rubbing on the rotor - at 3 o'clock in the picture



I certainly wouldn't let rotor rub stop me buying a watch that I wanted
 
Posts
1,978
Likes
2,137
these are signs of rotor rub - the black curved marks


and you can possibly see corresponding rubbing on the rotor - at 3 o'clock in the picture



I certainly wouldn't let rotor rub stop me buying a watch that I wanted
I WOULD however let rotor rub stop me from WEARING a watch without servicing it. IMO, even if they TELL you they fixed it, I wouldn't wear it until getting it into a watchmaker to at least evaluate whether it is rubbing (though you can often 'hear' it 'clicking' against the case back if you shake the watch).
 
Posts
33
Likes
7
Hello,

I have few more questions. Still on the hunt!

I realized that the ref. 168.0065 doesn’t have the star on the dial, and the text layout is a bit different. I think I actually prefer having the star… I have to consider that. By the way, that one would have been around €1500 (≈ $1700). Also on the pictures the case seems thicker than what I'm used to see, is it just an impression? Plus I read on the article posted above that the case should actually be slightly thiner.

I’ve now found another seller offering two pie-pan models. Both watches are said to be overhauled and original, except for the crown. When I asked about the dial the seller also mentioned that the dial is “most likely original, but there’s no way to be 100% sure.”

I’m not sure how to interpret that. Does it sound like genuine transparency to you, or could it indicate a potential issue with the dial?

Would you mind taking a look at the watches and sharing your thoughts?

Also, do you think an incorrect crown is a deal breaker?

One of them is priced around €1600 (≈ $1850). With bracelet

Thanks a lot!

There the pictures :

 
Posts
33
Likes
7
So basically, here are my main doubts:

If I go for the ref. 168.0065, I’m a bit concerned about the missing star. Even though I didn’t notice it at first, now I feel like I might miss it? (Or not at all)
I’m also wondering whether the case shape could be slightly different (thicker) and wear differently on the wrist, even though from what I’ve read it shouldn’t.

If I go for the ref. 168.005, my concerns are more about the crown (although I guess that could be replaced later) and especially the dial. The watchmaker says he can’t fully guarantee that it hasn’t been refinished, and I’m not sure how big of a risk that is?

On one hand, I think having the JDM version is pretty cool, but on the other hand I’m slightly worried it might be a “cheaper” version (with big quotation marks!) compared to the more classic pie-pan models, maybe a bit less collectible?

Even though I love watches, I’m definitely not an expert, so your help is really valuable to me.

Thanks again!
 
Posts
6,304
Likes
9,741
First of all, if you buy an .0065 you are buying an .0065.
It is not a classic dogleg.
The dial is different.
The movt is not the classic 500-series.
They were once thought to be somewhat uncommon but this is now not the case.
I don’t see anything wrong with the .0065 case.

The other two watches look good and look original.
However, these are late 60s doglegs and have painted indices not onyx inserts.
They are nice watches but not as collectible as earlier watches with onyx inserts.

Crowns can be replaced ( with some effort as they are no longer produced)
 
Posts
123
Likes
183
I also think that the other two watches look realy good. The original crown would be good but you can maybe find amother one. I would Go for the cal 500 ones because of the Movement. But on the other hand i also like the dial layout from the japan model. I also heard that the japan one also wears a little bit thicker.
 
Posts
6,304
Likes
9,741
Not sure where you both heard the ‘thicker’ story but I always understood that the cases were thinner than the classic dogleg with the 5-series movt.

Except from @dsio ’s essay on this reference.

 
Posts
33
Likes
7
Thank you so much for taking the time to answer! It really helps.

I’m giving up on the Japan version, I’d rather go for a classic dog leg pie pan 😀

About the painted indexes… right, there’s always something that could be better. I think even with that it’s still a very beautiful and collectible watch right ? so I’ll probably go for it. You're like the most extremist vintage omega people on the planet so it shouldn't stop me ahah (not saying that in a bad way)

Also, this is very similar to a pie-pan I had a few months ago (I returned it because the seller sent me a non-functioning watch twice), and it was apparently painted indexes as well, do you confirm ?it wasn't a problem for me back then..

It should actually be exactly the same, except for the crown?

The good news is I paid €2600 back then (got reimbursed). This time I’d be paying €1600 or €1800 depending on which one I choose so big savings!

About that, seller says the higher price on one watch is due to the sharper edges - which one do you think offers the best value? I guess I’ll really feel it in person, but I’d like your opinion.

One last question: what do you think about the seller saying “the dial is most likely original”? Is he just being cautious, or could it be a red flag? I tend to think it’s the first option, but since most sellers simply say everything is original, I’m wondering what you think about the dials and his overall approach.

 
Posts
33
Likes
7
Not sure where you both heard the ‘thicker’ story but I always understood that the cases were thinner than the classic dogleg with the 5-series movt.

Except from @dsio ’s essay on this reference.

I actually read the same thing as you, that the case should be thinner. But found it thicker on the pictures.