Is this a genuine Ref 166.0257 ?

Posts
2
Likes
0
Hi all, hope you are well. I was considering buying this Vintage seamaster ref 166.0257,but I wanted to double check if its genuine?
Thanks!
 
Posts
13,483
Likes
31,778
It's genuine but the case is very, very worn. PASS.
 
Posts
3,072
Likes
6,555
Follow recommended ebay listings thread here they are vetted and many new members buy their first watch from those listings.
Also Private Sales thread here. Better than fishing on your own on eBay.
 
Posts
10,454
Likes
16,354
I hope that is seriously cheap. Like 2 figures.
 
Posts
2
Likes
0
Any pictures of the movement inside??
Sadly, no. Well the fact the seller wont send a picture of the movement and the condition of the case, I'll have to pass. Thanks everyone!
 
Posts
10,454
Likes
16,354
Sadly, no. Well the fact the seller wont send a picture of the movement and the condition of the case, I'll have to pass. Thanks everyone!
You are right to move on. Those use the 1010 movement, which is so plain that many would think it were fake. Maybe that is why he wont show it. Or maybe it is full of rust. There are exceptions but as a rule of thumb, any Omega introduced* from around 1972 to 1985 is visually disappointing and feels decontented in many ways, this is one such model. You also need to avoid gold plated cases with damage like here as it will look tatty by eye can can't easily be improved.

*Before anyone spits out their cornflakes I don't include the Speedmaster Pro which continued as it was with minor changes in this period, not all the changes were improvements though it must be said.
Edited: