Is this 135.011 dial configuration original?

[timjohn]

This watch is long sold, but came across it when I was doing some research. It's a great looking watch, but is it a redial?
https://www.craftandtailored.com/products/1966-omega-seamaster-600-ref-135-011-black-dial

 

[dmtowl]

Absolutely beautiful and original. I own one of these. There are countless variations of 135.011 and 165.002

 

[Davidt]

I’d say that’s original.

Looks like a sterile ‘technical dial’.

https://omegaforums.net/threads/let...ster-companion-technic-technical-dials.85684/

 

[timjohn]

dmtowl

Absolutely beautiful and original. I own one of these. There are countless variations of 135.011 and 165.002

Dibs -- it's a great looking watch

 

[OneTwo]

Davidt

I’d say that’s original.

Looks like a sterile ‘technical dial’.

https://omegaforums.net/threads/let...ster-companion-technic-technical-dials.85684/

Couldn’t the OP watch just be considered a Speedmaster companion dial example like the one in the first image posted here? I thought the rule of thumb regarding the technical dials was that it had to have the crosshair.

 

[Davidt]

OneTwo

Couldn’t the OP watch just be considered a Speedmaster companion dial example like the one in the first image posted here? I thought the rule of thumb regarding the technical dials was that it had to have the crosshair.

I actually thought the Speedmaster companion was included in that thread but you’re right, it isn’t and that would be the best likeness

 

[DON]

That is the Speedmaster companion model. Simple dial with no added wording except the Omega name and logo