- Posts
- 1,567
- Likes
- 859
PatrickJ
路We all have a view on this, just like you all I speak what is on on my mind. I do like quartz myself, my Casio and Seiko are quartz. 馃槈
Edited:
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Why go for a seiko or casio and forego the quality and design of Omega? Quartz has many benefits. Accuracy, maintenance, price. And if you're not into movements etc you get to look at the same gorgeous dial.
The argument of getting a vintage instead is really not that viable. For one thing not everyone likes vintage, for another you can get quartz vintage watches, and lastly there are no vintage AT which is thw actual watch the OP likes.
Not sure why Rolex quartz is any more legit than Omega quartz. Many great brands have quartz models, even Gerald Genta produced quartz.
Also before casio or seiko I would recommend Swatch. More design choices, good quality and like it or not a very relevant historic brand value.
Enjoy it.
In my opinion, not saying this goes for every body. Let the Swiss make fine chocolate and mechanical movements and let Japan make reliable everyday electronic products. I enjoy both and respect them for what they are. The Casio, Seiko stands for something thing and the Omega stands for something else , no crossovers in my opinion.
Ever heard of Grand Seiko or Marinemaster?